A neural network predicts progression for men with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy

被引:52
|
作者
Han, M
Snow, PB
Epstein, JI
Chan, TY
Jones, KA
Walsh, PC
Partin, AW
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Xaim Inc, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00815-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine the significance of Gleason scores 3+4 (GS3+4) versus 4+3 (GS4+3) with respect to biochemical recurrence in a retrospective review of a series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and to develop and test an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the biochemical recurrence after surgery for this group of men using the pathologic and clinical data. Methods. From 1982 to 1998, 600 men had pathologic Gleason score 7 disease without lymph node or seminal vesicle involvement. We analyzed the freedom from biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) progression after RRP on 564 of these men on the basis of their GS3+4 versus GS4+3 (Gleason 7) status. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the importance of Gleason 7 status as an independent predictor of progression. In addition, an ANN was developed using randomly selected training and validation sets for predicting biochemical recurrence at 3 or 5 years. Different input variable subsets, with or without Gleason 7 status, were compared for the ability of the ANN to maximize the prediction of progression. Standard logistic regression was used concurrently on the same random patient population sets to calculate progression risk. Results. A significant recurrence-free survival advantage was found in men who underwent RRP for GS3+4 compared with those with GS4+3 disease (P < 0.0001). The ANN, logistic regression, and proportion hazard models demonstrated the importance of Gleason 7 status in predicting patient outcome. The ANN was better than logistic regression in predicting patient outcome, in terms of prostate-specific antigen progression, at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions, A simple modification of the Gleason scoring system for men with Gleason 7 disease revealed a difference in the patient outcome after RRP. ANN models can be developed and used to better predict patient outcome when pathologic and clinical features are known. UROLOGY 56: 994-999, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 999
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: Is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4+3 and 3+4 independent of the number of involved cores?
    Makarov, DV
    Sanderson, H
    Partin, AW
    Epstein, JI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (06): : 2440 - 2442
  • [22] The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
    Tohi, Yoichiro
    Matsuda, Iori
    Fujiwara, Kengo
    Harada, Satoshi
    Ito, Ayako
    Yamasaki, Mari
    Miyauchi, Yasuyuki
    Matsuoka, Yuki
    Kato, Takuma
    Taoka, Rikiya
    Tsunemori, Hiroyuki
    Ueda, Nobufumi
    Sugimoto, Mikio
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [23] Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy
    Keefe, Daniel T.
    Schieda, Nicola
    El Hallani, Soufiane
    Breau, Rodney H.
    Morash, Chris
    Robertson, Susan J.
    Mai, Kien T.
    Belanger, Eric C.
    Flood, Trevor A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 467 (04) : 437 - 442
  • [24] QUANTIFICATION OF SECONDARY GLEASON PATTERN 4 IN PATIENTS WITH GLEASON SCORE 3+4=7/GRADE GROUP 2 ON BIOPSY AND RISK OF ADVERSE PATHOLOGY AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Dean, Lucas W.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Assel, Melissa
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E199 - E199
  • [25] PTEN Loss in Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Biopsies is Associated with Nonorgan Confined Disease at Radical Prostatectomy
    Guedes, Liana B.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Hicks, Jessica
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : 1054 - 1059
  • [26] Incidence of metastasis and prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis in Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 prostate cancer
    Kamel, Mohamed H.
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Alobuia, Wilson M.
    Su, Joseph
    Davis, Rodney
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2018, 10 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [27] Are Men with Gleason Score 3+4=7 Cancer on Biopsy Candidates for Active Surveillance?
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Tosoian, Jeff
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 223A - 223A
  • [28] Nomograms Predict Survival Advantages of Gleason Score 3+4 Over 4+3 for Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Based Study
    Zhu, Xin
    Gou, Xin
    Zhou, Mi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [29] Are Men with Gleason Score 3+4=7 Cancer on Biopsy Candidates for Active Surveillance?
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Tosoian, Jeff
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 223A - 223A
  • [30] Concordance of T and Gleason staging in Prostate Biopsies (Gleason 3+4 with &lt;10% pattern 4) with Matched Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Cutforth, Iona
    Haider, Aiman
    Sah, Nilay
    Freeman, Alex
    Dickinson, Louise
    Giganti, Francesco
    Lamb, Benjamin W.
    Woernle, Alex
    Mitra, Anita
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2024, 264 : S36 - S36