A neural network predicts progression for men with Gleason score 3+4 versus 4+3 tumors after radical prostatectomy

被引:52
|
作者
Han, M
Snow, PB
Epstein, JI
Chan, TY
Jones, KA
Walsh, PC
Partin, AW
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Xaim Inc, Colorado Springs, CO USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00815-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine the significance of Gleason scores 3+4 (GS3+4) versus 4+3 (GS4+3) with respect to biochemical recurrence in a retrospective review of a series of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and to develop and test an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the biochemical recurrence after surgery for this group of men using the pathologic and clinical data. Methods. From 1982 to 1998, 600 men had pathologic Gleason score 7 disease without lymph node or seminal vesicle involvement. We analyzed the freedom from biochemical (prostate-specific antigen) progression after RRP on 564 of these men on the basis of their GS3+4 versus GS4+3 (Gleason 7) status. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the importance of Gleason 7 status as an independent predictor of progression. In addition, an ANN was developed using randomly selected training and validation sets for predicting biochemical recurrence at 3 or 5 years. Different input variable subsets, with or without Gleason 7 status, were compared for the ability of the ANN to maximize the prediction of progression. Standard logistic regression was used concurrently on the same random patient population sets to calculate progression risk. Results. A significant recurrence-free survival advantage was found in men who underwent RRP for GS3+4 compared with those with GS4+3 disease (P < 0.0001). The ANN, logistic regression, and proportion hazard models demonstrated the importance of Gleason 7 status in predicting patient outcome. The ANN was better than logistic regression in predicting patient outcome, in terms of prostate-specific antigen progression, at 3 and 5 years. Conclusions, A simple modification of the Gleason scoring system for men with Gleason 7 disease revealed a difference in the patient outcome after RRP. ANN models can be developed and used to better predict patient outcome when pathologic and clinical features are known. UROLOGY 56: 994-999, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:994 / 999
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy
    Chan, TY
    Partin, AW
    Walsh, PC
    Epstein, JI
    UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) : 823 - 827
  • [2] Pathological gleason 7 in 1323 men receiving radical prostatectomy: The necessity to separate the gleason patters 3+4 and 4+3?
    Turley, Ryan S.
    Sun, Leon
    Rampersaud, Edward N., Jr.
    Albala, David M.
    Moul, Judd W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 206 - 206
  • [3] Tertiary Gleason Pattern on Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 (Gleason Score 3+4) and Grade Group 3 (Gleason Score 4+3): Correlation with Adverse Prostatectomy Findings
    Gao, Yuan
    Shea-Budgell, Melissa
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Trpkov, Kiril
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [4] Tertiary Gleason Pattern on Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 (Gleason Score 3+4) and Grade Group 3 (Gleason Score 4+3): Correlation with Adverse Prostatectomy Findings
    Gao, Yuan
    Shea-Budgell, Melissa
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Trpkov, Kiril
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [5] Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3+4=4+3?
    Stark, Jennifer R.
    Perner, Sven
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Sinnott, Jennifer A.
    Finn, Stephen
    Eisenstein, Anna S.
    Ma, Jing
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Kurth, Tobias
    Loda, Massimo
    Giovannucci, Edward L.
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Mucci, Lorelei A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (21) : 3459 - 3464
  • [6] COMPARISON UPGRADING OF GLEASON SCORE 3+4 CANCERS AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN TARGET BIOPSY VERSUS STANDARD BIOPSY
    De Luca, Stefano
    Fiori, Cristian
    Morra, Ivano
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Garrou, Diletta
    Peretti, Dario
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Aimar, Roberta
    Cossu, Marco
    Ragni, Francesca
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Niculescu, Razvan Gabriel
    Massa, Federica
    Bollito, Enrico
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 39 (03) : 1567 - 1568
  • [7] SIGNIFICANCE OF TERTIARY PATTERN 5 IN PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES WITH GLEASON SCORE OF 3+4 OR 4+3 PROSTATE CANCER: PATHOLOGIC CORRELATION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Shah, Rajal B.
    Daignault, Stephanie
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, David P., Jr.
    Wei, John T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 754 - 754
  • [8] Significance of Tertiary Pattern 5 in Prostate Needle Biopsies with Gleason Score of 3+4 or 4+3 Prostate Cancer: Pathologic Correlation Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Shah, R. B.
    Daignault, S.
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, D. P., Jr.
    Wei, J. T.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 193A - 193A
  • [9] Significance of Tertiary Pattern 5 in Prostate Needle Biopsies with Gleason Score of 3+4 or 4+3 Prostate Cancer: Pathologic Correlation Following Radical Prostatectomy
    Shah, R. B.
    Daignault, S.
    Kunju, L. P.
    Wood, D. P., Jr.
    Wei, J. T.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 193A - 193A
  • [10] IN 538 GLEASON 7 DERIVED FROM RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY, GRADE 4+3 IS MORE FREQUENT THAN 3+4 IN HYPOGONADIC PATIENTS
    Neuzillet, Yann
    Raynaud, Jean-Pierre
    Molinie, Vincent
    Radulescu, Camelia
    Lebret, Thierry
    Botto, Henry
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E409 - E410