On the Relation between the Development of Working Memory Updating and Working Memory Capacity in Preschoolers

被引:9
|
作者
Panesi, Sabrina [1 ,2 ]
Bandettini, Alessia [2 ]
Traverso, Laura [2 ]
Morra, Sergio [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Educ Technol, I-16149 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Educ, I-16128 Genoa, Italy
关键词
updating; working memory; M capacity; executive function; preschoolers; IMPROVING FLUID INTELLIGENCE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; COMPLEX SPAN; CHILDREN; TASKS; DISTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/jintelligence10010005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study aims at investigating the relationship between working memory updating and working memory capacity in preschool children. A sample of 176 preschoolers (36-74 months) was administered a working memory updating task (Magic House) along with three working memory capacity tests that specifically measure their core attentional component (M capacity, as defined in the theory of constructive operators): Backward Word Span, Mr. Cucumber, and Direction Following Task. Correlational analyses and cross-classification prediction analyses were performed. Updating and capacity were significantly correlated, although the correlations were not high when age was partialled out. Capacity increased with age, and mediated the relation between age and updating. More importantly, cross-classification prediction analysis revealed that high updating scores with low M capacity, and low updating scores with relatively high M capacity, are possible events; the only combination ruled out was a low updating score with precocious development of M capacity. These facts demonstrate that updating skills in preschoolers depends on M capacity but does not coincide with it. Therefore, in cognitive developmental theories, the constructs of working memory updating and capacity should be distinguished, and on practical grounds, different tests should be used to measure them.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Working memory at work: How the updating process alters the nature of working memory transfer
    Zhang, Yanmin
    Verhaeghen, Paul
    Cerella, John
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2012, 139 (01) : 77 - 83
  • [32] Atypical development of social and nonsocial working memory capacity among preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders
    Gong, Linlin
    Guo, Dong
    Gao, Zaifeng
    Wei, Kunlin
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (02) : 327 - 339
  • [33] A TEST OF THE RELATION BETWEEN WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AND SYNTACTIC ISLAND EFFECTS
    Sprouse, Jon
    Wagers, Matt
    Phillips, Colin
    LANGUAGE, 2012, 88 (01) : 82 - 123
  • [34] Individual Differences in Updating Are Not Related to Reasoning Ability and Working Memory Capacity
    Frischkorn, Gidon T.
    von Bastian, Claudia C.
    Souza, Alessandra S.
    Oberauer, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2022, 151 (06) : 1341 - 1357
  • [35] Math and Memory in Bilingual Preschoolers: The Relations Between Bilingualism, Working Memory, and Numerical Knowledge
    Daubert, Emily N.
    Ramani, Geetha B.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 20 (03) : 314 - 333
  • [36] Working memory updating and the development of rule-guided behavior
    Amso, Dima
    Haas, Sara
    McShane, Lauren
    Badre, David
    COGNITION, 2014, 133 (01) : 201 - 210
  • [37] The relationship between working memory updating components and reading comprehension
    Linares, Rocio
    Pelegrina, Santiago
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2023, 24 (02) : 253 - 265
  • [38] The relationship between working memory updating components and reading comprehension
    Rocío Linares
    Santiago Pelegrina
    Cognitive Processing, 2023, 24 : 253 - 265
  • [39] The Development of Time-Based Prospective Memory in Childhood: The Role of Working Memory Updating
    Voigt, Babett
    Mahy, Caitlin E. V.
    Ellis, Judi
    Schnitzspahn, Katharina
    Krause, Ivonne
    Altgassen, Mareike
    Kliegel, Matthias
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 50 (10) : 2393 - 2404
  • [40] Is working memory capacity fixed?
    Klingberg, Torkel
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 1 (03) : 194 - 196