Comparison of the Xpert MTB/RIF Test with an IS6110-TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Specimens

被引:140
|
作者
Armand, Sylvie [1 ]
Vanhuls, Pascale [1 ]
Delcroix, Guy [1 ]
Courcol, Rene [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lemaitre, Nadine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille Nord France, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] UDSL, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] INSERM, U1019, F-59021 Lille, France
[5] Ctr Natl Rech Sci, UMR8204, F-59021 Lille, France
关键词
ACID AMPLIFICATION TESTS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PULMONARY; PERFORMANCE; COMPLEX; DNA;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.02157-10
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and an in-house IS6110-based real-time PCR using TaqMan probes (IS6110-TaqMan assay) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA were compared by use of 117 clinical specimens (97 culture positive and 20 culture negative for MTBC) that were frozen in sediment. The 97 clinical specimens included 60 respiratory and 37 nonrespiratory specimens distributed into 36 smear-positive and 61 smear-negative specimens. Among the 97 culture-positive specimens, 4 had rifampin-resistant isolates. Both methods were highly specific and exhibited excellent sensitivity (100%) with smear-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the Xpert MTB/RIF test with the whole smear-negative specimens was more reduced than that of the IS6110-TaqMan assay (48 versus 69%, P = 0.005). Both methods exhibited similar sensitivities with smear-negative respiratory specimens, but the Xpert MTB/RIF test had lower sensitivity with smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens than the IS6110-TaqMan assay (37 versus 71%, P = 0.013). Finally, the sensitivities of the Xpert MTB/RIF test and the IS6110-TaqMan assay were 79% and 84%, respectively, with respiratory specimens and 53% and 78%, respectively (P = 0.013), with nonrespiratory specimens. The Xpert MTB/RIF test correctly detected the rifampin resistance in smear-positive specimens but not in the one smear-negative specimen. The Xpert MTB/RIF test is a simple rapid method well adapted to a routine laboratory that appeared to be as sensitive as the IS6110-TaqMan assay with respiratory specimens but less sensitive with paucibacillary specimens, such as smear-negative nonrespiratory specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:1772 / 1776
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of CapitalBio™ Mycobacterium nucleic acid detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF assay for rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis
    Yu, Guocan
    Shen, Yanqin
    Ye, Bo
    Chen, Da
    Xu, Kan
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2020, 168
  • [22] Accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF assay compared with AdvanSure™ TB/NTM real-time PCR using bronchoscopy specimens
    Ko, Y.
    Lee, H-K.
    Lee, Y. S.
    Kim, M-Y.
    Shin, J. H.
    Shim, E-J.
    Park, S. Y.
    Mo, E. K.
    Park, Y. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2016, 20 (01) : 115 - U177
  • [23] P285: Comparison of two nucleic acid amplification assays, the probetec et assay and xpert mtb/rif assay, for detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens
    S Aljohani
    M Alshomrani
    Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 2 (Suppl 1)
  • [24] Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF with Line Probe Assay for Detection of Rifampin-Monoresistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Rufai, Syed Beenish
    Kumar, Parveen
    Singh, Amit
    Prajapati, Suneel
    Balooni, Veena
    Singh, Sarman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (06) : 1846 - 1852
  • [25] Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical isolates and sputum specimens
    Zhang, Hongtai
    Dai, Xiaowei
    Hu, Peilei
    Tian, Lili
    Li, Chuanyou
    Ding, Beichuan
    Yang, Xinyu
    He, Xiaoxin
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (05):
  • [26] Evaluation of the cobas MTB and MTB-RIF/INH assay in clinical samples for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory specimens
    Eigner, Ulrich
    Koeffer, Jasmin
    Betz, Ulrike
    Koglin, Janina
    Richter, Elvira
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [27] Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis
    Hong Zheng
    Fangming Zhong
    Guocan Yu
    Yanqin Shen
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2021, 40 : 969 - 977
  • [28] Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of the CapitalBio Mycobacterium real-time polymerase chain reaction detection test and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis
    Zheng, Hong
    Zhong, Fangming
    Yu, Guocan
    Shen, Yanqin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 40 (05) : 969 - 977
  • [29] Comparison of the real-time polymerase chain reaction and xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Abd-Elaziz, Nada F.
    Salem, Heba A.
    Nagy, Hala M.
    Farhat, Amgad A.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEST DISEASES AND TUBERCULOSIS, 2024, 73 (02): : 136 - 145
  • [30] Comparison of the real-time PCR method and the gen-probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and nonpulmonary specimens
    Lemaître, N
    Armand, S
    Vachée, A
    Capilliez, O
    Dumoulin, C
    Courcol, RJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (09) : 4307 - 4309