STRATEGIC CONSOLIDATION UNDER FORMULA APPORTIONMENT

被引:12
|
作者
Buettner, Thiess [1 ]
Riedel, Nadine [2 ,3 ]
Runkel, Marco [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Econ, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Business Taxat, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Stuttgart Hohenheim, Dept Econ, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Econ & Management, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
corporate taxation; formula apportionment; individual taxpayer data; CORPORATE-TAX BASE; EUROPEAN-UNION; PROFIT TAX; TAXATION; COMPETITION; MULTINATIONALS; REFORM;
D O I
10.17310/ntj.2011.2.01
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper argues that profit-shifting activities exist for multi-jurisdictional enterprises (MJEs) under a tax system of consolidation and formula apportionment (FA). A theoretical model discusses how a MJE can exploit strategically its impact on the definition of the consolidated group. The analysis shows that the MJE will not consolidate if intra-group tax-rate differences - and thereby potential gains from profit shifting - are large. We test this prediction using confidential firm-level tax-return data for the local business tax in Germany. The identification strategy exploits a quasi-experiment derived from a major company tax reform in 2001 that significantly reduced the costs associated with separating out individual affiliates. Our results show that, evaluated at the sample mean, an increase in the tax-rate variance among a MJE's affiliates by one standard deviation reduces the number of consolidated affiliates by 20 percent.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 254
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE EU APPORTIONMENT FORMULA: INSIGHTS FROM A BUSINESS CASE
    Roggeman, Annelies
    Verleyen, Isabelle
    Van Cauwenberge, Philippe
    Coppens, Carine
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 14 (02) : 235 - 251
  • [22] Corporate profit tax, capital mobility, and formula apportionment
    Pinto, Santiago M.
    JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (01) : 76 - 102
  • [23] The downside of formula apportionment: evidence on factor demand distortions
    Nadine Riedel
    International Tax and Public Finance, 2010, 17 : 236 - 258
  • [24] BEFIT and Formulary Apportionment: Should Intangibles Be Included in the Formula?
    Martins, Antonio
    Taborda, Daniel
    EC TAX REVIEW, 2022, 31 (03): : 131 - 139
  • [25] The effects of EU formula apportionment on corporate tax revenues
    Devereux, Michael P.
    Loretz, Simon
    FISCAL STUDIES, 2008, 29 (01) : 1 - 33
  • [26] CCCTB formula apportionment: The evidence from different economic sectors
    Krchniva, Katerina
    Nerudova, Danuse
    THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF PUBLIC FINANCE 2016, 2016, : 34 - 41
  • [27] Comparison of European, Canadian and US formula apportionment on real data
    Krchniva, Katerina
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENTERPRISE AND COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT 2014, 2014, 12 : 309 - 318
  • [28] FORMULA APPORTIONMENT: IS IT BETTER THAN THE CURRENT SYSTEM AND ARE THERE BETTER ALTERNATIVES?
    Altshuler, Rosanne
    Grubert, Harry
    NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2010, 63 (04) : 1145 - 1184
  • [29] State corporate income taxation: An evaluation of the formula apportionment system
    Lopez, S
    Martinez-Vazquez, J
    90TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON TAXATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 155 - 162
  • [30] Distortional effects of separate accounting and formula apportionment on factor allocation
    Ortmann R.
    Pummerer E.
    Journal of Business Economics, 2023, 93 (8) : 1277 - 1307