fMRI analysis software tools: an evaluation framework

被引:0
|
作者
Pedoia, Valentina [1 ]
Colli, Vittoria [2 ]
Strocchi, Sabina [2 ]
Vite, Cristina [2 ]
Binaghi, Elisabetta [1 ]
Conte, Leopoldo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dipartimento Informat & Comunicaz, Varese, Italy
[2] Ospedale Circolo Varese & Fdn Macchi, Serv Fis Sanitaria, Varese, Italy
[3] Univ Insubria, Dipartimento Sci Cliniche & Biol, Varese, Italy
关键词
fMRI; statistical parametrical map; software packages evaluation; information overlap;
D O I
10.1117/12.877067
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Performance comparison of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) software tools is a very difficult task. In this paper, a framework for comparison of fMRI analysis results obtained with different software packages is proposed. An objective evaluation is possible only after pre-processing steps that normalize input data in a standard domain. Segmentation and registration algorithms are implemented in order to classify voxels belonging to brain or not, and to find the non rigid transformation that best aligns the volume under inspection with a standard one. Through the definitions of intersection and union of fuzzy logic an index was defined which quantify information overlap between Statistical Parametrical Maps (SPMs). Direct comparison between fMRI results can only highlight differences. In order to assess the best result, an index that represents the goodness of the activation detection is required. The transformation of the activation map in a standard domain allows the use of a functional Atlas for labeling the active voxels. For each functional area the Activation Weighted Index (AWI) that identifies the mean activation level of whole area was defined. By means of this brief, but comprehensive description, it is easy to find a metric for the objective evaluation of a fMRI analysis tools. Trough the first evaluation method the situations where the SPMs are inconsistent were identified. The result of AWI analysis suggest which tool has higher sensitivity and specificity. The proposed method seems a valid evaluation tool when applied to an adequate number of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of nonlinear static analysis methods and software tools for seismic analysis of highway bridges
    Shattarat, Nasim K.
    Symans, Michael D.
    McLean, David I.
    Cofer, William F.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2008, 30 (05) : 1335 - 1345
  • [32] A Methodological Framework for Evaluating Software Testing Techniques and Tools
    Vos, Tanja E. J.
    Marin, Beatriz
    Jose Escalona, Maria
    Marchetto, Alessandro
    2012 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY SOFTWARE (QSIC), 2012, : 230 - 239
  • [34] A Framework for the Development of Biomedical Text Mining Software Tools
    Lourenco, Analia
    Carreira, Rafael
    Carneiro, Sonia
    Maia, Paulo
    Glez-Pena, Daniel
    Fdez-Riverola, Florentino
    Ferreira, Eugenio C.
    Rocha, Isabel
    Rocha, Miguel
    8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 352 - +
  • [35] DNA for manufacturing Microsoft creates framework for software tools
    Hoske, MT
    CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (02) : 71 - +
  • [36] Lipsia -: A software package for the analysis of fMRI data
    Lohmann, G
    Müller, K
    Bosch, V
    Mentzel, H
    Busch, N
    von Cramon, DY
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S190 - S190
  • [37] Make Your Tools Sparkle with Trust: The PICSE Framework for Trust in Software Tools
    Johnson, Brittany
    Bird, Christian
    Ford, Denae
    Forsgren, Nicole
    Zimmermann, Thomas
    2023 IEEE/ACM 45TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IN PRACTICE, ICSE-SEIP, 2023, : 409 - 419
  • [38] Performance evaluation of the software visualization tools and a new framework to manage cognitive load in computer program learning
    Mathematics and IT Unit, Dhofar University, Salalah, Oman
    不详
    不详
    WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl., 2008, 5 (655-663):
  • [39] Adversarial Analysis of Software Composition Analysis Tools
    Ivanova, Ekaterina
    Stakhanova, Natalia
    Sistany, Bahman
    INFORMATION SECURITY, PT II, ISC 2024, 2025, 15258 : 161 - 182
  • [40] SETE: software tools for the evaluation of team work
    Amengual, E.
    Mas, A.
    Mesquida, A.
    SISTEMAS Y TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACION, 2010, : 314 - 318