Artificial Intelligence and the Purpose of Social Systems

被引:6
|
作者
Benthall, Sebastian [1 ]
Goldenfein, Jake [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Law, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
artificial intelligence; cybernetics; economics; intermediaries; liberalism; platforms; privacy; MARKETS; PRIVACY; RIGHTS; COSTS; LAW;
D O I
10.1145/3461702.3462526
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The law and ethics of Western democratic states have their basis in liberalism. This extends to regulation and ethical discussion of technology and businesses doing data processing. Liberalism relies on the privacy and autonomy of individuals, their ordering through a public market, and, more recently, a measure of equality guaranteed by the state. We argue that these forms of regulation and ethical analysis are largely incompatible with the techno-political and techno-economic dimensions of artificial intelligence. By analyzing liberal regulatory solutions in the form of privacy and data protection, regulation of public markets, and fairness in AI, we expose how the data economy and artificial intelligence have transcended liberal legal imagination. Organizations use artificial intelligence to exceed the bounded rationality of individuals and each other. This has led to the private consolidation of markets and an unequal hierarchy of control operating mainly for the purpose of shareholder value. An artificial intelligence will be only as ethical as the purpose of the social system that operates it. Inspired by the science of artificial life as an alternative to artificial intelligence, we consider data intermediaries: sociotechnical systems composed of individuals associated around collectively pursued purposes. An attention cooperative, that prioritizes its incoming and outgoing data flows, is one model of a social system that could form and maintain its own autonomous purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SYSTEMS OF ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE
    KUZIN, LT
    VOPROSY FILOSOFII, 1979, (02) : 59 - 61
  • [32] Integrated Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Brachman, Ron
    Gunning, Dave
    Burke, Murray
    AI MAGAZINE, 2020, 41 (02) : 66 - 82
  • [33] Artificial intelligence for IoT systems
    Muñoz, Andrés
    Augusto, Juan Carlos
    Tam, Vincent
    Aghajan, Hamid
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 2020, 12 (01):
  • [34] Neuromorphic artificial intelligence systems
    Ivanov, Dmitry
    Chezhegov, Aleksandr
    Kiselev, Mikhail
    Grunin, Andrey
    Larionov, Denis
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [35] Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Corchado, Emilio
    Grana, Manuel
    Snasel, Vaclav
    Wozniak, Michal
    NEURAL NETWORK WORLD, 2010, 20 (07) : 807 - 809
  • [36] Gender and Social Perspective in STEM Training: Artificial Intelligence Systems for Emotion Detection
    Sainz-de-Baranda Andujar, Clara
    Blanco-Ruiz, Marian
    Miranda Calero, Jose Angel
    Gutierrez Martin, Laura
    Canabal Benito, Manuel Felipe
    San-Segundo, Rosa
    Lopez Ongil, Celia
    SOCIOLOGIA Y TECNOCIENCIA, 2021, 11 : 83 - 115
  • [37] Social, Legal, and Technical Considerations for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Systems in Government
    Dreyling, Richard
    Jackson, Eric
    Tammet, Tanel
    Labanava, Alena
    Pappel, Ingrid
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICEIS 2021), VOL 1, 2021, : 701 - 708
  • [38] WILL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EAT THE LAW? THE RISE OF HYBRID SOCIAL-ORDERING SYSTEMS
    Wu, Tim
    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 2019, 119 (07) : 2001 - 2028
  • [39] Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence
    Matjaž Perc
    Mahmut Ozer
    Janja Hojnik
    Palgrave Communications, 5 (1)
  • [40] Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence
    Seth D. Baum
    AI & SOCIETY, 2020, 35 : 165 - 176