Organization and Outcomes of Integrated Inpatient Medical and Psychiatric Care Units: A Systematic Review

被引:5
|
作者
van Schijndel, Maarten A. [1 ,2 ]
van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H. [3 ]
van de Klundert, Joris J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rijnstate Hosp, Arnhem, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Coll Business & Entrep, King Abdullah Econ City, Saudi Arabia
关键词
MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM; MODELS; EVOLUTION; LEVEL; AGE;
D O I
10.1176/appi.ps.202000416
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The goal of this review was to assess the relationships among aims, designs, and outcomes of inte-grated inpatient medical and psychiatric care units (IMPUs) and gather the evidence base on the effectiveness of these units. Methods: Using online searches of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, the authors identified and reviewed liter-ature describing the aims and outcomes of specific IMPU designs. Results: The search yielded 55 studies, in which the authors identified 39 IMPUs that focused on patients with mood, psychotic, somatic symptom, substance use, organic, and personality disorders and a broad array of medical diagno-ses. Most units were psychiatric-medical units and had medium medical and psychiatric acuity capabilities. The studies reviewed provided little information on the cost-effectiveness of various IMPU designs. Although some comparative studies indicated reductions in hospital length of stay (LOS), these studies were generally of low quality and rarely reported other intended outcomes. Conclusions: IMPUs may help shorten LOS. IMPUs should focus care on patients with complex conditions and high acuity to maximize health system value. Implementing compulsory admission facilities; qualified psychiatric, med-ical, and nursing staff involvement; and cross-disciplinary training may improve IMPUs' capacity to treat high-acuity patients. Future research should relate IMPU designs to intended outcomes. Psychiatric Services 2022; 73:64-76; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000416
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 76
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE CHANGING ORGANIZATION OF INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC-CARE IN GENERAL HOSPITALS
    OLFSON, M
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1990, 41 (04): : 443 - 445
  • [22] How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review
    Reid, L. E. M.
    Crookshanks, A. J. F.
    Jones, M. C.
    Morrison, Z. J.
    Lone, N. I.
    Weir, C. J.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 111 (08) : 515 - 523
  • [23] Combined medical-psychiatric inpatient units -: Evaluation of the centre for the elderly
    Maier, A. B.
    Waechtler, C.
    Hofmann, W.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2007, 40 (04): : 268 - 274
  • [24] PEDIATRIC CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT IN MEDICAL-PSYCHIATRIC INPATIENT UNITS
    Mattar, Mirabelle
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (10): : S82 - S82
  • [25] State of the science: Outcomes of acute inpatient psychiatric care
    Gerolamo, AM
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2004, 18 (06) : 203 - 214
  • [26] MEDICAL NECESSITY SCALES FOR INPATIENT PSYCHIATRIC CONCURRENT REVIEW
    GLAZER, WM
    KRAMER, R
    MONTGOMERY, JS
    MYERS, L
    HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 43 (09): : 935 - 937
  • [27] Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review
    Kaiser, Laura
    Conrad, Susann
    Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
    Pietsch, Barbara
    Pieper, Dawid
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [28] Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes in inpatient care: a systematic review
    Laura Kaiser
    Susann Conrad
    Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
    Barbara Pietsch
    Dawid Pieper
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [29] Psychiatric inpatient care for adults with intellectual disabilities: generic or specialist units?
    Xenitidis, K
    Gratsa, A
    Bouras, N
    Hammond, R
    Ditchfield, H
    Holt, G
    Martin, J
    Brooks, D
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2004, 48 : 11 - 18