The distance to the LMC cluster NGC 1866; clues from the cluster Cepheid population

被引:16
|
作者
Groenewegen, MAT
Salaris, M
机构
[1] PACS ICC, Inst Sterrenkunde, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Astrophys Res Inst, Birkenhead CH41 1LD, Merseyside, England
关键词
stars : distances; Cepheids; Magellanic Clouds; distance scale;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20031332
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Recent investigations aimed at estimating the distance to the young LMC cluster NGC 1866 have made use of Red Clump stars in the surrounding LMC field, together with empirical and theoretical Main-Sequence fitting methods, and have found significantly different distances for the field and the cluster, the latter being closer by in distance modulus by Delta(DM) similar to 0.20 mag. In this paper we (re-) consider the Cepheid star population of NGC 1866, to try to shed some light on this discrepancy. By combining various extensive photometric datasets in B, V; I and single-epoch 2 mass JHK photometry, PL relationships for the cluster Cepheids are obtained. A comparison between the field LMC and cluster PL relationships for the reddening free Wesenheit index gives a firm determination of the distance between the cluster and the LMC main body (0.04 mag in distance modulus, the cluster being more distant) which, coupled to a model for the geometry of the LMC disk, provides Delta(DM) ranging between 0.0 and - 0.11 mag. The simultaneous comparison of the PL relationships in B, V and I for the cluster and LMC field gives an estimate of the cluster reddening, which results to be E( B - V) = 0.12 +/- 0.02. This determination is higher than the canonical value of 0.06 mag used in all previous studies, but we show that it is not in contradiction with a re- analysis of independent estimates. The adoption of the LMC extinction law recently presented by Gordon et al. (2003) does not change these results. The cluster Main Sequence fitting distance obtained with this new reddening is DM = 18.58 +/- 0.08, fully compatible with the Red Clump value of DM = 18.53 +/- 0.07(random)(-0.05)(+0.02) (systematic) and the Cepheid constraint on Delta( DM). Finally, we determined the distance to the cluster by using a Cepheid Wesenheit PL relationship with slope coming from LMC observations, and absolute magnitude zero point calibrated on Hipparcos parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids, in the assumption that the relationship is independent of metallicity; the resulting DM = 18.65 +/- 0.10 is not an accurate estimate of the LMC distance because of possible metallicity effects but, when compared to the revised Main Sequence fitting value, it points out to a possibly weak dependence of the Wesenheit PL relationship on the Cepheid chemical composition, at least in the period range between 2.5 and 3.5 days.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 896
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AGE AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF LMC CLUSTER NGC 2209
    GASCOIGNE, SCB
    NORRIS, J
    BESSELL, MS
    HYLAND, AR
    VISVANATHAN, N
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 209 (01): : L25 - L28
  • [32] Determination of the IMF in the LMC stellar cluster NGC 2156
    Silva-Villa, E.
    Sirianni, M.
    Zuluaga, J.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE ASTRONOMIA Y ASTROFISICA, 2008, 44 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [33] Variable Stars in the LMC Globular Cluster NGC 2210
    Jeon, Young-Beom
    Nemec, James M.
    Walker, Alistair R.
    STELLAR PULSATION: CHALLENGES FOR THEORY AND OBSERVATION, 2009, 1170 : 211 - +
  • [34] Bright populations of the LMC cluster NGC 1978 from multicolor CCD photometry
    Alcaíno, G
    Liller, W
    Alvarado, F
    Kravtsov, V
    Ipatov, A
    Samus, N
    Smirnov, O
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1999, 135 (01): : 103 - 109
  • [35] A COMPARISON BETWEEN OBSERVED AND THEORETICAL H-R DIAGRAMS FOR THE YOUNG LMC STAR CLUSTER NGC-1866
    BECKER, SA
    MATHEWS, GJ
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 270 (01): : 155 - 168
  • [36] Cepheid variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC 1866.: I.: New BVRI CCD photometry
    Gieren, WP
    Gómez, M
    Storm, J
    Moffett, TJ
    Infante, L
    Barnes, TG
    Geisler, D
    Fouqué, P
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2000, 129 (01): : 111 - 121
  • [37] THE HUBBLE CONSTANT AND VIRGO CLUSTER DISTANCE FROM OBSERVATIONS OF CEPHEID VARIABLES
    PIERCE, MJ
    WELCH, DL
    MCCLURE, RD
    VANDENBERGH, S
    RACINE, R
    STETSON, PB
    NATURE, 1994, 371 (6496) : 385 - 389
  • [38] STUDY OF THE OPEN CLUSTER NGC 6546 AND CEPHEID AV SAGITTARII
    GRAYZECK, EJ
    FITZGERALD, MP
    LUIKEN, M
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 1979, 90 (538) : 742 - 750
  • [39] The cluster population of NGC 5253
    Vanzi, L
    Sauvage, M
    Cresci, G
    FORMATION AND EVOLUTION OF MASSIVE YOUNG STAR CLUSTERS, 2004, 322 : 223 - 224
  • [40] DYNAMICS OF THE YOUNG BINARY LMC CLUSTER NGC-1850
    FISCHER, P
    WELCH, DL
    MATEO, M
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 105 (03): : 938 - 955