Does simultaneous versus individual-arch at-home dental bleaching regimen influence patient satisfaction? A randomized clinical trial

被引:2
|
作者
Carneiro, Taynara S. [1 ]
Favoreto, Michael W. [1 ]
Centenaro, Gabrielle G. [1 ]
Carneiro, Otavio S. [2 ]
Crovador, Cleyson J. [2 ]
Stanislawczuk, Rodrigo [2 ]
Reis, Alessandra [1 ]
Loguercio, Alessandro D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Ponta Grossa, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Ave Carlos Cavalcanti 4748,Bloco M,Sala 64-A, BR-84030900 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[2] Higher Educ Ctr Campos Gerais, Sch Dent, Dept Dent, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
bleaching agents; clinical trial; hydrogen peroxide; patient comfort; tooth bleaching; HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE; IN-OFFICE; 10-PERCENT; CARBAMIDE; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12962
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective Our randomized, parallel and single-blinded clinical trial evaluated patient level of discomfort during at-home bleaching testing the equivalence between two different protocols for the use of bleaching trays (simultaneous vs. single arch), as well as tooth sensitivity (TS), gingival irritation, (GI) and bleaching efficacy (BE). Materials and Methods We randomized 100 patients into: simultaneous (n = 50) and single arch (n = 50). At-home bleaching was performed with 10% hydrogen peroxide (HP) for 2 weeks for simultaneous group and 4 weeks for single arch group. We assessed patient level of discomfort using 9-item questionnaire. The TS and GI, as well as BE using spectrophotometer and color guide were assessed using the visual analog scale (0-10). Data from level of discomfort and BE were evaluated by Student's t test. The TS and GI were compared using the relative risk and confidence interval (alpha = 0.05). Results Only tray adaptation showed a significant effect after the second week (p < 0.002). There was equivalence between groups for level of discomfort (p < 0.01). We found no significant intergroup differences for the risk of TS or GI, nor for intensity. We observed no significant differences between them regarding bleaching efficacy (p > 0.21). Conclusions A simultaneous-use protocol for customized at-home dental bleaching trays proved to be equivalent to using single arch for patient level of discomfort and bleaching efficacy, with no significant increase in adverse effects. Clinical Significance Clinicians may decide whether to use a simultaneous or single arch protocol for tray usage; however, bleaching was achieved more quickly when the trays were worn simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1271
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tooth sensitivity with a desensitizing-containing at-home bleaching gel-a randomized triple-blind clinical trial
    Maran, Bianca Medeiros
    Vochikovski, Laina
    de Andrade Hortkoff, Diego Rafael
    Stanislawczuk, Rodrigo
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    Reis, Alessandra
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2018, 72 : 64 - 70
  • [32] Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Fernandes Monteiro, Marcilio Jorge
    Correa Lindoso, Jessica Bruna
    de Oliveira Conde, Nikeila Chacon
    da Silva, Luciana Mendonca
    Loguercio, Alessandro D.
    Pereira, Juliana Vianna
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2199 - 2206
  • [33] A Randomized Clinical Trial: Patient Satisfaction of Paper Versus Electronic Provider Feedback
    Margulies, Samantha Lee
    Bernard, Adele
    Leone, Anna M.
    Geller, Elizabeth J.
    UROGYNECOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03): : 181 - 187
  • [34] Patient Satisfaction in Oral versus Intravenous Sedation for Vitrectomies: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Subramanian, Manju L.
    Fiorello, Marissa
    Kim, Jiwoo
    Vig, Viha
    Ness, Steven D.
    Siegel, Nicole
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)
  • [35] Influence of diet and red wine exposure on the velocity of at home bleaching: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    De Souza, Jamile Menezes
    Alves Da Silva Aguiar, Joao Paulo
    Batista Das Neves, Washington Jose
    Espindola-Castro, Luis Felipe
    Tenorio Salvador Da Costa, Daene Patricia
    Vicente Da Silva, Claudio Heliomar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 35 (04): : 191 - 196
  • [36] Evaluation of the Efficacy and Color Stability of Two Different At-Home Bleaching Systems on Teeth of Different Shades: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Aka, Betul
    Celik, Esra Uzer
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 29 (05) : 325 - 338
  • [37] Evaluation of At-home Bleaching Times on Effectiveness and Sensitivity with 10% Hydrogen Peroxide: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Clinical Trial
    Chemin, K.
    Rezende, M.
    Costa, M. C.
    Salgado, A. D. Y.
    de Geus, J. L.
    Loguercio, A. D.
    Reis, A.
    Kossatz, S.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 46 (04) : 385 - 394
  • [38] Patient Satisfaction with Oral versus Intravenous Sedation for Cataract Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Peeler, Crandall E.
    Villani, Catherine M.
    Fiorello, Marissa G.
    Lee, Hyunjoo J.
    Subramanian, Manju L.
    Desai, Manishi A.
    Siegel, Nicole H.
    Luther, Daniel J.
    Esparaz, Elizabeth S.
    Pira, Tony
    Eliassi, Babak
    Leidl, Matthew
    Ness, Steven
    Sekhar, Pavan
    Norris, Mark C.
    Mustafa, Wissam H.
    Zalewski, Stephen
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1212 - 1218
  • [39] A randomized patient education trial investigating treatment-related distress and satisfaction with the use of an at-home gynecologic brachytherapy educational video
    Kotha, Nikhil, V
    Guram, Kripa
    Morgan, Kylie
    Deshler, Leah
    Brown, Derek
    Rash, Dominique
    Dyer, Brandon
    McHale, Michael
    Yashar, Catheryn
    Scanderbeg, Daniel
    Einck, John
    Mayadev, Jyoti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (07) : 1125 - 1131
  • [40] Long-term efficacy of in-office and at-home bleaching: A 2-year double-blind randomized clinical trial
    Tay, Lidia Yileng
    Kose, Carlos
    Herrera, Daniel Rodrigo
    Reis, Alessandra
    Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 25 (04): : 199 - 204