Bowel Peristalsis Artifact on Dual-Energy CT: In Vitro Study on the Influence of Different Dual-Energy CT Platforms and Enteric Contrast Agents

BACKGROUND. The value of dual-energy CT (DECT) for bowel wall assessment is increasingly recognized. Although technical improvements reduce peristalsis artifact in conventional CT, the effects of peristalsis on DECT image reconstructions remain poorly studied. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different DECT scanners and enteric contrast agents on the severity of bowel peristalsis artifact in vitro. METHODS. To simulate bowel peristalsis, a 3-cm-diameter corrugated hollow tube representing the bowel was oscillated constantly in the z-axis within a larger water-filled cylinder. The bowel was serially filled with air, water, and iodinated or experimental dark contrast material and scanned on four different DECT platforms (spectral detector, rapid peak kilovoltage switching, split filter, and dual source) to reconstruct 120-kVp-like and iodine images. Two readers rated each image reconstruction for artifact severity from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) and recorded the degree to which iodine images depicted bowel wall hyperattenuation on 120-kVp-like images as artifactual. Artifact severity scores were compared by ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS. Interrater agreement on artifact scores was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.79-0.84]). For 120-kVp-like images, mean peristalsis artifact scores were lower (all p < .001) for split-filter (1.47) and dual-source (1.86) scanners than for spectral-detector (2.58) and rapid-kilovoltage-switching (2.74) scanners. Compared with those on 120-kVp images, peristalsis artifacts on iodine images were less severe for spectral-detector (score, 1.03; p < .001) and rapid-kilovoltage-switching (2.09; p < .001) systems but more severe for dual-source (2.77; p < .001) and split-filter (2.62; p < .001) systems. Peristalsis artifact was rated less severe with experimental dark bowel contrast medium (score, 1.79) than with other bowel contrast agents (all p <.001). Iodine images helped identify bowel wall hyperattenuation as artifactual in 94.7% of reviewed cases for spectral-detector and 40.7% of cases for rapid-kilovoltage-switching scanners. CONCLUSION. For spectral-detector and rapid-kilovoltage-switching DECT, iodine images minimize peristalsis artifact, but for dual-source and split-filter DECT, mixed 120kVp-like images are preferred. Compared with iodinated contrast material and water, experimental dark bowel contrast material reduces peristalsis artifact. CLINICAL IMPACT. Knowledge of the preferred images for reducing peristalsis artifact can lessen the effect of peristalsis on clinical DECT interpretation. Dark enteric contrast agents, when they become clinically available, may further reduce the effects of peristalsis.