Association of Immunosuppressive Maintenance Regimens With Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Kidney Transplant Recipients

被引:63
|
作者
Sampaio, Marcelo Santos [1 ]
Cho, Yong W. [1 ]
Shah, Tariq [1 ,2 ]
Bunnapradist, Suphamai [3 ]
Hutchinson, Ian V. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mendez Natl Inst Transplantat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] St Vincents Med Ctr, Kidney Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Kidney Transplant Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ So Calif, Sch Pharm, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Kidney transplant; Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder; Epstein-Barr virus; UNOS; Immunosuppressive drugs; EPSTEIN-BARR-VIRUS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; UNITED-STATES; RAPAMYCIN IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; RISK-FACTORS; SIROLIMUS; MALIGNANCY; GROWTH; TACROLIMUS;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e31823ae7db
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The association of immunosuppressive regimens (ISRs) with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) may be related with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) recipient serostatus. Methods. We selected primary kidney transplant recipients from Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database (2000-2009) who were discharged with a functioning graft and were receiving an ISR including an antiproliferative drug and a calcineurin inhibitor as follows: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolate sodium+tacrolimus (TAC), MMF+cyclosporine A (CsA); mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi)+TAC; and mTORi+CsA. Adjusted risks of PTLD, rejection, death, and graft failure were examined in all recipients and compared between EBV+ nd EBV-recipients. Results. Of 114,025 recipients, 754 developed PTLD (5-year incidence of 0.84%). Adjusted hazard ratio for PTLD was 4.39 (95% CI: 3.60 -5.37) for EBV-versus EBV+recipients; and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.03-1.90) for mTORi+TAC, 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65-0.99) for MMF+CsA, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.57-1.42) for mTORi+CsA, versus MMF+TAC users. In EBV-recipients, hazard ratio for PTLD was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.28 - 3.07) for mTORi+TAC, 0.45 (95% CI: 0.28-0.72) for MMF+CsA, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.39-1.80) for mTORi+CsA users versus MMF+TAC. No difference was seen in EBV+recipient groups. Rejection rates were higher among MMF+CsA recipients in both EBV groups. Death and graft failure risk were increased in all EBV+ISR groups, while in EBV-these risks were only increased in mTORi+TAC group versus MMF+TAC. Conclusions. In EBV-recipients, immunosuppression with mTORi+TAC was associated with increased risk of PTLD, death, and graft failure, while MMF+CsA use was associated with a trend to increased risk of rejection, lower PTLD risk, and similar risk for graft failure when compared with MMF+TAC.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS IN PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Sergi, C.
    Yu, D.
    Girgis, S.
    Chiu, B.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2014, 61 : S118 - S119
  • [22] Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in liver transplant recipients: A report of seventeen cases.
    Patel, H
    Vogl, D
    Aqui, N
    Stadtmauer, EA
    Olthoff, K
    Tsai, DE
    BLOOD, 2005, 106 (11) : 434A - 434A
  • [23] The differential effects of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens on cardiovascular disease risk profile in kidney transplant recipients.
    Luan, Fu L.
    Miles, Clifford D.
    Norman, Silas
    Chopra, Pavan
    Cibrik, Diane M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 534 - 534
  • [24] Gastrointestinal involvement of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in lung transplant recipients: Report of a case
    Shitrit, D
    Shitrit, ABG
    Dickman, R
    Sahar, G
    Saute, M
    Kramer, MR
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (11) : 2144 - 2147
  • [25] Diagnosis and management of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid-organ transplant recipients
    Preiksaitis, JK
    Keay, S
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 : S38 - S46
  • [26] Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in adult liver transplant recipients: A report of seventeen cases
    Patel, Himisha
    Vogl, Dan T.
    Aqui, Nicole
    Shaked, Abraham
    Olthoff, Kim
    Markmann, James
    Reddy, Rajender
    Stadtmauer, Edward A.
    Schuster, Stephen
    Tsai, Donald E.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2007, 48 (05) : 885 - 891
  • [27] Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder - Incidence, presentation, and response to treatment in lung transplant recipients
    Reams, D
    McAdams, HP
    Howell, DN
    Steele, MP
    Davis, RD
    Palmer, SM
    CHEST, 2003, 124 (04) : 1242 - 1249
  • [28] Effects of Three Immunosuppressive Regimens On Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Ferreira, A.
    Felipe, C.
    Ueno, P.
    Hannun, P.
    Gusukuma, L.
    Cristelli, M.
    Sandes-Freitas, T.
    Tedesco, H.
    Franco, M.
    Medina-Pestana, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 540 - 540
  • [29] Association of different immunosuppressive regimens with posttransplant de novo malignancies in liver recipients.
    Cherikh, WS
    Kauffman, HM
    Shames, BD
    Cheng, Y
    Hanto, DW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 392 - 392
  • [30] Immunosuppressive regimens in lung transplant recipients
    Bhorade, SM
    Villanueva, J
    Jordan, A
    Garrity, ER
    DRUGS OF TODAY, 2004, 40 (12) : 1003 - 1012