Optimization of nonlinear inelastic steel frames considering panel zones

被引:18
|
作者
Manh-Hung Ha [1 ]
Quang-Viet Vu [2 ]
Viet-Hung Truong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Civil Engn, Dept Struct Mech, 55 GiaiPhong Rd, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Danang 550000, Vietnam
[3] Thuyloi Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 175 TaySon, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Optimization; Steel frame; Differential evolution; Panel-zone; Advanced analysis; PRACTICAL ADVANCED ANALYSIS; CHARGED SYSTEM SEARCH; OPTIMUM DESIGN; SEISMIC DESIGN; TRUSS STRUCTURES; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; SEMIRIGID CONNECTIONS; GENETIC ALGORITHM; DISCRETE; GEOMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102771
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this article, an efficient methodology is developed to optimize nonlinear steel frames under several load combinations. For that purpose, inelastic advanced analyses of steel frames are performed using plastic hinge beam-column elements to reduce computational efforts. An improved differential evolution (DE) algorithm is utilized as a global optimizer to refine the solution accuracy and enhance the convergence speed. Compared to the conventional DE algorithm, this newly developed method provides four major improvements such as: (1) a new mutation strategy based on the p-best method; (2) the multi-comparison technique (MCT) to decrease the number of unnecessary objective function evaluations; (3) a promising individual method (PIM) to choose trial individuals; and (4) a trial matrix containing all evaluated individuals to avoid objective function evaluations of duplicate individuals. Furthermore, panel zones are taken account of optimum design for the first time. Doubler plates are designed to prevent panel-zone shear deformations. Three mid- to large-size steel frames considering several load combinations required by AISC-LRFD are considered. Five new and efficient meta-heuristic algorithms are employed for comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INELASTIC BEHAVIOR OF MULTISTORY STEEL FRAMES.
    El-Zanaty, Mohamed H.
    Murray, David W.
    Bjorhovde, Reidar
    Structural Engineering Report, 1980, (83):
  • [32] Inelastic behaviour of moment resistant steel frames
    Chui, PPT
    Chan, SL
    ADVANCES IN STEEL STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 195 - 200
  • [33] Geometric tolerances of welded connections with inelastic panel zones
    Wen, Ce
    Skiadopoulos, Andronikos
    Lignos, Dimitrios G.
    ce/papers, 2023, 6 (3-4) : 1550 - 1555
  • [34] Multidisciplinary Optimization for Steel-Aluminum Composite Frames Considering Vibration Characteristics
    Song Y.
    Xu Q.
    Xu F.
    Ruan S.
    Su J.
    Wang L.
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 30 (07): : 846 - 851and876
  • [35] Progressive Collapse-Resisting Capacity of Steel Moment Frames Considering Panel Zone Deformation
    Kim, Taewan
    Kim, Jinkoo
    ADVANCES IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 12 (02) : 231 - 240
  • [36] Inelastic Ultimate Load Analysis of Steel Frames Considering Lateral Torsional Buckling under Distributed Loads
    Secer, Mutlu
    Uzun, Ertugrul Turker
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 63 (03): : 872 - 881
  • [37] A structural model for panel zones in non linear seismic analysis of steel moment-resisting frames
    Mulas, MG
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2004, 26 (03) : 363 - 380
  • [38] Nonlinear Inelastic Analysis of 2D Steel Frames An Improvement of the Plastic Hinge Method
    Phu-Cuong Nguyen
    Binh Le-Van
    Son Dong Tam Vo Thanh
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (04) : 5974 - 5978
  • [39] Investigating effects of various base restraints on the nonlinear inelastic static and seismic responses of steel frames
    Phu-Cuong Nguyen
    Kim, Seung-Eock
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NON-LINEAR MECHANICS, 2017, 89 : 151 - 167
  • [40] Seismic optimization and performance assessment of special steel moment-resisting frames considering nonlinear soil-structure interaction
    Gholizadeh, Saeed
    Milany, Arman
    Hasancebi, Oguzhan
    STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2023, 47 (03): : 339 - 353