Comparison of Coracoid Graft Position and Fixation in the Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: A Cadaveric Study

被引:7
|
作者
Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro [2 ]
Garcia-Esteo, Francisco [3 ,4 ]
Merida-Velasco, Jose Ramon [1 ]
Barrio-Asensio, Carmen [1 ]
Lopez-Fernandez, Pedro [5 ,6 ]
Aramberri-Gutierrez, Mikel [1 ,7 ]
Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Anat & Embryol, Avda Complutense S-N, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Hosp Fraternidad Muprespa, Madrid, Spain
[3] Jimenez Diaz Fdn, Serv Traumatol, Madrid, Spain
[4] Francisco de Vitoria Univ, Fac Med, Dept Basic Med Sci, Madrid, Spain
[5] Rey Juan Carlos Univ, Dept Basic Hlth Sci, Div Human Anat & Embryol, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Hosp Rey Juan Carlos, Dept Surg, Madrid, Spain
[7] Alai Sports Med Clin, Madrid, Spain
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2020年 / 48卷 / 09期
关键词
shoulder instability; open Latarjet technique; arthroscopic Latarjet technique; graft positioning; graft fixation; cadaveric study; 2-DIMENSIONAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RECURRENT ANTERIOR DISLOCATION; SHOULDER DISLOCATION; BONE-BLOCK; BRISTOW; INSTABILITY; REPAIRS;
D O I
10.1177/0363546520930419
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since the description of the arthroscopic Latarjet technique, discussion about the superiority of the open or arthroscopic procedure has arisen. The appropriate placement of the coracoid graft (CG) on the anterior glenoid neck is reported to be the most important step of the Latarjet procedure. Purpose: To verify if there are differences in the parameters that may affect the final position and fixation of CG obtained from the open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human paired cadaveric shoulder specimens were randomly distributed in 2 surgery groups (open group [OG] and arthroscopic group [AG]) with 10 specimens in each. Two surgeons, each with experience performing open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques, executed these procedures: one surgeon performed all open techniques, and the other performed all arthroscopic techniques, respectively. After surgery, a computerized tomography scan was performed. The surgical time, the position of each CG, a series of variables that might affect the CG fixation, and the level of the subscapularis muscle split were evaluated. Results: The mean surgical time was significantly longer in the AG (mean, 26 minutes for OG and 57 minutes for AG). Three intraoperative complications (30%) were identified in the AG, consisting of graft fractures. The CG was determined to be in an optimal cranial-caudal position in 90% of specimens of the OG and 44% of the AG (Fisher,P= .057). In both groups, the CG was placed in an optimal medial-lateral position in all specimens. In the OG, the degree of parallelism between the major axes of the glenoid surface and CG was significantly greater than in the AG (mean, 3.8o for OG and 15.1o for AG). No significant differences were observed in superior and inferior screw orientation between the groups. In the longitudinal and transverse directions, significant differences were found in the centering of the superior screw, being closer to the ideal point in the OG than in the AG. The location where the longitudinal subscapularis muscle split was performed was significantly higher in the AG. Conclusion: The open Latarjet technique required less surgical time; presented a lower number of intraoperative complications; and allowed more adequate placement of the CG, better centering of the screws, and a subscapularis muscle split closer to the ideal position.
引用
收藏
页码:2105 / 2114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-clinical results at short term follow-up
    Kordasiewicz, Bartlomiej
    Malachowski, Konrad
    Kicinski, Maciej
    Chaberek, Slawomir
    Pomianowski, Stanislaw
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (05) : 1023 - 1033
  • [42] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up
    Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz
    Konrad Małachowski
    Maciej Kicinski
    Sławomir Chaberek
    Stanisław Pomianowski
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 1023 - 1033
  • [43] A Multicenter Comparison of Open Versus Arthroscopic Fixation for Pediatric Tibial Spine Fractures
    Shimberg, Jilan L.
    Leska, Tomasina M.
    Cruz, Aristides I., Jr.
    Patel, Neeraj M.
    Ellis, Henry B., Jr.
    Ganley, Theodore J.
    Johnson, Ben
    Milbrandt, Todd A.
    Yen, Yi-Meng
    Mistovich, R. Justin
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (04) : 195 - 200
  • [44] Comparative study of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder dislocation
    Rai, Saroj
    Tamang, Nira
    Sharma, Laxmi Kanta
    Marasini, Rudra Prasad
    Singh, Janith Lal
    Khanal, Kiran
    Ghimire KC, Milan
    Sherchan, Binod
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (04)
  • [45] Classic Versus Congruent Coracoid Positioning During the Latarjet Procedure: An In Vitro Biomechanical Comparison
    Boons, Harm W.
    Giles, Joshua W.
    Elkinson, Ilia
    Johnson, James A.
    Athwal, George S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (02): : 309 - 316
  • [46] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Davey, Martin S.
    Montgomery, Connor
    O'Doherty, Ross
    Gaafar, Mohamed
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Mullett, Hannan
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [47] Arthroscopic versus open Latarjet: a step-by-step comprehensive and systematic review
    Michael-Alexander Malahias
    Emmanouil Fandridis
    Dimitrios Chytas
    Efstathios Chronopulos
    Emmanouil Brilakis
    Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2019, 29 : 957 - 966
  • [48] Arthroscopic versus open Latarjet: a step-by-step comprehensive and systematic review
    Malahias, Michael-Alexander
    Fandridis, Emmanouil
    Chytas, Dimitrios
    Chronopulos, Efstathios
    Brilakis, Emmanouil
    Antonogiannakis, Emmanouil
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (05): : 957 - 966
  • [49] Does previous arthroscopic Bankart repair influence coracoid graft osteolysis in Latarjet procedure? A case-control study with computed tomography scan data
    Sahin, Koray
    Sarikas, Murat
    Cesme, Dilek Hacer
    Topal, Murat
    Kapiciog, Mehmet
    Bilsel, Kerem
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (04) : e223 - e230
  • [50] Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic and open lunate excisions in the cadaveric wrist
    Onishi, Tadanobu
    Kira, Tsutomu
    Omokawa, Shohei
    Iida, Akio
    Shimizu, Takamasa
    Kawamura, Kenji
    Nagashima, Mitsuyuki
    Mahakkanukrauh, Pasuk
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 84