Toward aerosol/cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) closure during CRYSTAL-FACE

被引:81
|
作者
VanReken, TM
Rissman, TA
Roberts, GC
Varutbangkul, V
Jonsson, HH
Flagan, RC
Seinfeld, JH
机构
[1] CALTECH, Dept Chem Engn, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Ctr Atmospher Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] USN, Postgrad Sch, Ctr Interdisciplinary Remotely Piloted Aircraft S, Marina, CA 93633 USA
关键词
CCN closure; CCN instrumentation; CRYSTAL-FACE; aircraft measurements; cloud;
D O I
10.1029/2003JD003582
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] During July 2002, measurements of cloud condensation nuclei were made in the vicinity of southwest Florida as part of the Cirrus Regional Study of Tropical Anvils and Cirrus Layers-Florida Area Cirrus Experiment (CRYSTAL-FACE) field campaign. These observations, at supersaturations of 0.2 and 0.85%, are presented here. The performance of each of the two CCN counters was validated through laboratory calibration and an in situ intercomparison. The measurements indicate that the aerosol sampled during the campaign was predominantly marine in character: the median concentrations were 233 cm(-3) (at S = 0.2%) and 371 cm(-3) (at S = 0.85%). Three flights during the experiment differed from this general trend; the aerosol sampled during the two flights on 18 July was more continental in character, and the observations on 28 July indicate high spatial variability and periods of very high aerosol concentrations. This study also includes a simplified aerosol/CCN closure analysis. Aerosol size distributions were measured simultaneously with the CCN observations, and these data are used to predict a CCN concentration using Kohler theory. For the purpose of this analysis, an idealized composition of pure ammonium sulfate was assumed. The analysis indicates that in this case, there was good general agreement between the predicted and observed CCN concentrations: at S = 0.2%, N-predicted/N-observed = 1.047 (R-2 = 0.911); at S = 0.85%, N-predicted/N-observed = 1.201 (R-2 = 0.835). The impacts of the compositional assumption and of including in-cloud data in the analysis are addressed. The effect of removing the data from the 28 July flight is also examined; doing so improves the result of the closure analysis at S = 0.85%. When omitting that atypical flight, N-predicted/N-observed = 1.085 (R-2 = 0.770) at S = 0.85%.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary organic aerosol (OPOA)
    Lambe, A. T.
    Onasch, T. B.
    Massoli, P.
    Croasdale, D. R.
    Wright, J. P.
    Ahern, A. T.
    Williams, L. R.
    Worsnop, D. R.
    Brune, W. H.
    Davidovits, P.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (17) : 8913 - 8928
  • [42] Effects of aerosol organics on cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) concentration and first indirect aerosol effect
    Wang, J.
    Lee, Y. -N.
    Daum, P. H.
    Jayne, J.
    Alexander, M. L.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (21) : 6325 - 6339
  • [43] Saharan dust storms and indirect aerosol effects on clouds: CRYSTAL-FACE results
    Sassen, K
    DeMott, PJ
    Prospero, JM
    Poellot, MR
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (12)
  • [44] Measured and modelled cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration in Sao Paulo, Brazil: the importance of aerosol size-resolved chemical composition on CCN concentration prediction
    Almeida, G. P.
    Brito, J.
    Morales, C. A.
    Andrade, M. F.
    Artaxo, P.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (14) : 7559 - 7572
  • [45] Atmospheric organic and bio-aerosols as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN): A review
    Sun, JM
    Ariya, PA
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (05) : 795 - 820
  • [46] Satellite retrieval of cloud condensation nuclei concentrations by using clouds as CCN chambers
    Rosenfeld, Daniel
    Zheng, Youtong
    Hashimshoni, Eyal
    Poehlker, Mira L.
    Jefferson, Anne
    Poehlker, Christopher
    Yu, Xing
    Zhu, Yannian
    Liu, Guihua
    Yue, Zhiguo
    Fischman, Baruch
    Li, Zhanqing
    Giguzin, David
    Goren, Tom
    Artaxo, Paulo
    Barbosa, Henrique M. J.
    Poeschl, Ulrich
    Andreae, Meinrat O.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2016, 113 (21) : 5828 - 5834
  • [47] Semi-automated calibration procedure for cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) measurement
    Rubens Marreira
    Francisco Pinheiro
    Bulletin of Atmospheric Science and Technology, 2025, 6 (1)
  • [48] Ground radar-based ice cloud microphysical retrievals during the crystal-face field campaign
    Matrosov, S
    Shupe, M
    Schneider, T
    Hazen, D
    31ST CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 67 - 69
  • [49] When do insoluble particles act as good cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)?
    Nenes, Athanasios
    Kumar, Prashant
    Sokolik, Irina
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 242
  • [50] Bursts of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) by dissipating clouds at Palmer Station, Antarctica
    Saxena, VK
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1996, 23 (01) : 69 - 72