The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD

被引:304
|
作者
Puhan, M. A. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Chandra, D. [3 ]
Mosenifar, Z. [4 ]
Ries, A. [5 ]
Make, B. [6 ]
Hansel, N. N. [2 ]
Wise, R. A. [2 ]
Sciurba, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Div Pulm Sci & Crit Care Med, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[7] Univ Zurich, Horten Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treatment; clinical trials; exercise tests; rehabilitation; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GEORGES-RESPIRATORY-QUESTIONNAIRE; CHRONIC LUNG-DISEASE; WALK DISTANCE; DYSPNEA;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.00063810
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Our aim was to determine the minimal important difference (MID) for 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and maximal cycle exercise capacity (MCEC) in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 1,218 patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial completed exercise tests before and after 4-6 weeks of pre-trial rehabilitation, and 6 months after randomisation to surgery or medical care. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (domain and total scores) and University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (total score) served as anchors for anchor-based MID estimates. In order to calculate distribution-based estimates, we used the standard error of measurement, Cohen's effect size and the empirical rule effect size. Anchor-based estimates for the 6MWD were 18.9 m (95% CI 18.1-20.1 m), 24.2 m (95% CI 23.4-25.4 m), 24.6 m (95% CI 23.4-25.7 m) and 26.4 m (95% CI 25.4-27.4 m), which were similar to distribution-based MID estimates of 25.7, 26.8 and 30.6 m. For MCEC, anchor-based estimates for the MID were 2.2 W (95% CI 2.0-2.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W) and 3.3 W (95% CI 3.0-3.5 W), while distribution-based estimates were 5.3 and 5.5 W. We suggest a MID of 26 +/- 2 m for 6MWD and 4 +/- 1 W for MCEC for patients with severe COPD.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Responsiveness of the COPD Assessment Test The Minimal Clinically Important Difference Does Matter Response
    Jones, Paul W.
    CHEST, 2012, 142 (01) : 268 - 269
  • [32] Minimal important difference of quadriceps femoris muscle strength after high-intensity exercise training in patients with COPD: Preliminary results
    Quessada, Alana
    Nellessen, Aline G.
    Bisca, Gianna W.
    Silva, Jhaton V.
    Longo, Taina
    Rodrigues, Antenor
    Donaria, Leila
    Furlanetto, Karina C.
    Sant'Anna, Thais
    Hernandes, Nidia A.
    Pitta, Fabio
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [33] How important is a minimal difference?
    Troosters, T.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 37 (04) : 755 - 756
  • [34] Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Lurie, Jon D.
    Mayer, Tom G.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : 1739 - 1743
  • [35] The Severe Asthma Questionnaire (SAQ) - minimal clinically important difference and sensitivity to change
    Masoli, Matthew
    Lanario, Joseph
    Hyland, Michael
    Menzies-Gow, Andrew
    Mansur, Adel
    Allen, David
    James, Dodd
    Hayes, Gemma
    Valderas, Jose
    Lamb, Sallie
    Jones, Rupert
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [36] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the COPD Assessment Test in fibrotic interstitial lung disease
    Matsuda, Toshiaki
    Kondoh, Yasuhiro
    Takei, Reoto
    Sasano, Hajime
    Fukihara, Jun
    Yamano, Yasuhiko
    Yokoyama, Toshiki
    Kataoka, Kensuke
    Watanabe, Fumiko
    Kimura, Tomoki
    RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 62 (06) : 1088 - 1093
  • [37] The Responsiveness of Exercise Tests in COPD
    Harvey-Dunstan, Theresa C.
    Baldwin, Molly M.
    Tal-Singer, Ruth
    Allinder, Matthew
    Polkey, Michael I.
    Hamilton, Alan
    Richardson, Matthew
    Edwards, Sarah A.
    Steiner, Michael C.
    Morgan, Mike D.
    Singh, Sally J.
    CHEST, 2025, 167 (01) : 98 - 111
  • [38] Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference
    Alma, Harma
    de Jong, Corina
    Jelusic, Danijel
    Wittmann, Michael
    Schuler, Michael
    Flokstra-de Blok, Bertine
    Kocks, Janwillem
    Schultz, Konrad
    van der Molen, Thys
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 26
  • [39] Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Quadriceps Muscle Strength in People with COPD following Pulmonary Rehabilitation
    Oliveira, Ana
    Rebelo, Patricia
    Paixao, Catia
    Jacome, Cristina
    Cruz, Joana
    Martins, Vitoria
    Simao, Paula
    Brooks, Dina
    Marques, Alda
    COPD-JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2021, 18 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [40] Estimation of the minimal important difference (MID) for the 1 repetition max (1RM) in COPD
    Edwards, George D.
    Patel, Suhani
    Jenkins, Timothy
    Ingram, Karen A.
    Man, William D-C
    Nolan, Claire M.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62