Minimally Invasive Port Access Approach for Reoperations on the Mitral Valve

被引:19
|
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
Wallen, Tyler
Pulsipher, Aaron
Pitkin, Emil
Solometo, Lauren P.
Musthaq, Shenara
Fox, Jeanne
Acker, Michael
Hargrove, W. Clark, III
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Cardiac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2015年 / 100卷 / 01期
关键词
RIGHT THORACOTOMY; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; REPLACEMENT; HYPOTHERMIA; EXPERIENCE; OPERATION; RISK; CABG;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In patients requiring a second-time or more operation on the mitral valve (MV), we assessed whether the outcomes of the minimally invasive port access approach (port access group) were equivalent to those of the traditional redo sternotomy approach (redo sternotomy group). Methods. In a retrospective review (1998-2011), 409 patients had previous MV operations requiring a second-time or more MV reintervention. Of those, 67 patients had the port access approach, and 342 had the redo sternotomy approach. Of the latter, 220 met the inclusion criteria because emergencies, patients with endocarditis, and those requiring concomitant procedures involving aortic valve and aorta were excluded. Results. New York Heart Association class 2 or above, age, atrial fibrillation, and surgical indications were similar in both groups. The port access group had more patients with previous MV repair (78% [n = 52] vs 41% [n = 90], p < 0.01) than with MV replacement (19% [n =13) vs 53% [n = 116], p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures were similar (20% [n = 14] vs 27% [n = 59], p = 0.4). The MV re-repair rates were similar (19% [n = 10] vs 22% [n [20], p = 1). The cardiopulmonary bypass times (153 +/- 42 minutes vs 172 +/- 83 minutes, p = 0.07) and aortic cross-clamping times (104 +/- 38 minutes versus 130 +/- 71 minutes, p < 0.01) were lower in the port access group. Mortality was lower in the port access group, although not significantly (3.0% [n = 2] vs 6.0% [n = 13], p = 0.5). The rates of postoperative stroke were similar (3.0% [n [ 2] vs 3.2% [n = 7], p = 1). On postoperative echocardiography, freedom from mitral regurgitation >2+ was 100% in the port access group and 99% in the redo sternotomy group. The mean hospital length of stay was 11 +/- 15 days versus 14 +/- 12 days (p = 0.07). Conclusions. The port access approach can be safely adopted for reoperations on the MV without compromising postoperative mortality or MV function. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aortic and mitral valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach
    Klokocovnik, T
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 1998, 25 (03) : 166 - 169
  • [22] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: The subxiphoid approach - Commentary
    Chitwood, WR
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (05): : 1333 - 1333
  • [23] Results of minimally invasive approach for rheumatic mitral valve disease
    Vivek Kanhere
    Nikhil Pendse
    Vinod Narkhede
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10 (Suppl 1)
  • [24] Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery - Comparison of Port-Access and Conventional Standard Approach
    Hiraoka, Arudo
    Kuinose, Masahiko
    Chikazawa, Genta
    Totsugawa, Toshinori
    Katayama, Keijiro
    Yoshitaka, Hidenori
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (07) : 1656 - 1660
  • [25] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery
    Walther, T
    Falk, V
    Mohr, FW
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 45 (05): : 487 - 495
  • [26] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery
    Tam, RKW
    Ho, C
    Almeida, AA
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (01): : 246 - 247
  • [27] Minimally invasive mitral valve repair
    Mateo Marin Cuartas
    Piroze Minoo Davierwala
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020, 36 : 44 - 52
  • [28] Minimally invasive mitral valve operations
    Navia, JL
    Cosgrove, DM
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (05): : 1542 - 1544
  • [29] Minimally invasive mitral valve repair
    Welp, Henryk
    Martens, Sven
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 27 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [30] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery
    Moritz, A
    Dogan, S
    Aybek, T
    Kessler, P
    Matheis, G
    Wimmer-Greinecker, G
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1999, 88 : 24 - 28