Minimally Invasive Port Access Approach for Reoperations on the Mitral Valve

被引:19
|
作者
Vallabhajosyula, Prashanth
Wallen, Tyler
Pulsipher, Aaron
Pitkin, Emil
Solometo, Lauren P.
Musthaq, Shenara
Fox, Jeanne
Acker, Michael
Hargrove, W. Clark, III
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Div Cardiac Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2015年 / 100卷 / 01期
关键词
RIGHT THORACOTOMY; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; REPLACEMENT; HYPOTHERMIA; EXPERIENCE; OPERATION; RISK; CABG;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.039
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. In patients requiring a second-time or more operation on the mitral valve (MV), we assessed whether the outcomes of the minimally invasive port access approach (port access group) were equivalent to those of the traditional redo sternotomy approach (redo sternotomy group). Methods. In a retrospective review (1998-2011), 409 patients had previous MV operations requiring a second-time or more MV reintervention. Of those, 67 patients had the port access approach, and 342 had the redo sternotomy approach. Of the latter, 220 met the inclusion criteria because emergencies, patients with endocarditis, and those requiring concomitant procedures involving aortic valve and aorta were excluded. Results. New York Heart Association class 2 or above, age, atrial fibrillation, and surgical indications were similar in both groups. The port access group had more patients with previous MV repair (78% [n = 52] vs 41% [n = 90], p < 0.01) than with MV replacement (19% [n =13) vs 53% [n = 116], p < 0.01). Concomitant procedures were similar (20% [n = 14] vs 27% [n = 59], p = 0.4). The MV re-repair rates were similar (19% [n = 10] vs 22% [n [20], p = 1). The cardiopulmonary bypass times (153 +/- 42 minutes vs 172 +/- 83 minutes, p = 0.07) and aortic cross-clamping times (104 +/- 38 minutes versus 130 +/- 71 minutes, p < 0.01) were lower in the port access group. Mortality was lower in the port access group, although not significantly (3.0% [n = 2] vs 6.0% [n = 13], p = 0.5). The rates of postoperative stroke were similar (3.0% [n [ 2] vs 3.2% [n = 7], p = 1). On postoperative echocardiography, freedom from mitral regurgitation >2+ was 100% in the port access group and 99% in the redo sternotomy group. The mean hospital length of stay was 11 +/- 15 days versus 14 +/- 12 days (p = 0.07). Conclusions. The port access approach can be safely adopted for reoperations on the MV without compromising postoperative mortality or MV function. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 73
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive port access approach for reoperations on the mitral valve
    Pereda, Daniel
    CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR, 2016, 23 (03): : 146 - +
  • [2] Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery
    Mohr, FW
    Falk, V
    Diegeler, A
    Walther, T
    van Son, JAM
    Autschbach, R
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03): : 567 - 574
  • [3] Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery - Discussion
    Chitwood, WR
    Grossi, E
    Carpentier, AF
    Mohr
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03): : 574 - 576
  • [4] Fifteen-year experience with minimally invasive approach for reoperations involving the mitral valve
    Arcidi, Joseph M., Jr.
    Rodriguez, Evelio
    Elbeery, Joseph R.
    Nifong, L. Wiley
    Efird, Jimmy T.
    Chitwood, W. Randolph, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (05): : 1062 - 1068
  • [5] (con) re minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery
    Baldwin, JC
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03): : 563 - 564
  • [6] (pro) re minimally invasive port-access mitral valve surgery
    Verrier, ED
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 115 (03): : 565 - 566
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: Technique of Choice for Cardiac Reoperations
    Ricci, Davide
    Barbero, Cristina
    Marchetto, Giovanni
    ElQarra, Suad
    Boffini, Massimo
    Rinaldi, Mauro
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 162 - 163
  • [8] Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: Prospective randomized study
    Dogan, S
    Aybek, T
    Risteski, PS
    Detho, F
    Rapp, A
    Wimmer-Greinecker, G
    Moritz, A
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (02): : 492 - 498
  • [9] Clinical experiences with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port access™ technique
    Gulielmos, V
    Dangel, M
    Solowjowa, N
    Wagner, FM
    Karbalai, P
    Schmidt, V
    Schueler, S
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 14 (02) : 141 - 146
  • [10] Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: From port access to fully robotic-assisted surgery
    Donias, HW
    Karamanoukian, HL
    D'Ancona, G
    Hoover, EL
    ANGIOLOGY, 2003, 54 (01) : 93 - 101