Indication Creep of Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids

被引:4
|
作者
McElwee, Eliza R. [1 ]
Wilkinson, Kyla [1 ]
Crowe, Rebecca [1 ]
Newman, Jill C. [2 ]
Alkis, Mallory [1 ]
Wineland, Rebecca [1 ]
Finneran, Matthew M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
late preterm steroids; indication creep; preterm labor; BETAMETHASONE; HYPOGLYCEMIA;
D O I
10.1055/a-1785-9290
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective While antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administered in the late preterm period have been shown to reduce respiratory morbidity, this finding was demonstrated in a well-designed randomized controlled trial (the Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery [ALPS]) with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that may differ from clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there has been indication creep since use of late preterm ACS became standard of care. Study Design Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who received late preterm ACS between 2016 and 2019 were identified and separated into epochs of 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019 based on year of exposure. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate ACS exposure, defined as nonadherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the ALPS trial. Secondary outcomes were rates of nonoptimal ACS exposure (delivery >7 days from ACS or term delivery). Logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) between epochs for the primary outcome adjusting for confounders. Results There were 660 women who received late preterm ACS during the study period with 229 (34.6 %) deemed inappropriate exposures. The most common reason for inappropriate treatment was preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM; 29.0%) with exclusionary cervical examination or contraction frequency. No difference was observed in inappropriate ACS exposure between epochs (aOR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.2). However, there was a reduction in nonoptimal exposure over time (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.97) . Women receiving inappropriate ACS were more likely to deliver at term if indicated for maternal/fetal status (50.0 vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001) and preterm labor (66.0 vs. 41.9%; p = 0.015). Further, inappropriate exposure in preterm labor had higher rates of exposure latency >7 days (62.3 vs. 39.1%, p = 0.006) with a longer latency to delivery (3 vs .16 days; p < 0.001). Conclusion Over one-third of women received late preterm ACS for an indication that could be classified as indication creep. Depending on indication, inappropriate administration is associated with higher rates of nonoptimal exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1165
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Collider bias in a secondary analysis of the antenatal late preterm steroids trial
    Dehaene, Isabelle
    Roelens, Kristien
    Smets, Koenraad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 231 (05) : e192 - e192
  • [22] Antenatal steroids and neonatal outcomes in late preterm births with pregestational diabetes
    Khanuja, Kavisha
    Jayakumaran, Jenani
    Al-Kouatly, Huda B.
    Mclaren, Rodney A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (02) : 767 - 774
  • [23] Antenatal late preterm steroids: Patterns of use at a tertiary care center
    Psoinos, Rachel
    Phillips, Julie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S331 - S332
  • [24] Neonatal hypoglycemia after antenatal late preterm steroids in individuals with diabetes
    Annie M. Dude
    Lynn M. Yee
    Andrea Henricks
    Patrick Eucalitto
    Nevert Badreldin
    Journal of Perinatology, 2021, 41 : 2749 - 2753
  • [25] Evaluation of Hypoglycemia in Neonates of Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery: An Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids Trial Cohort Study
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    Jablonski, Kathleen A.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Jain, Lucky
    Saade, George R.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Clark, Erin A. S.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Chien, Edward K.
    Peaceman, Alan M.
    Gibbs, Ronald S.
    Swamy, Geeta K.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    VanDorsten, J. Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (05) : 532 - 538
  • [26] Frequency of Neonatal Hypoglycemia After Implementation of Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids Use
    Alrais, Mesk A.
    Chen, Han-Yang
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 125S - 125S
  • [27] Euglycemia after antenatal late preterm steroids: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Ye, Yuanfan
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Casey, Brian M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Boggess, Kim A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (04)
  • [28] Antenatal Steroids in Late Preterm Gestation: Efficacy of One vs Two Doses
    Wajid, Naji A.
    Shanahan, Lisa K. T.
    Staudenmaier, Emily K.
    Vullo, John
    Gurram, Padmalatha
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 114S - 115S
  • [29] Past and Present: A Review of Antenatal Corticosteroids and Recommendations for Late Preterm Birth Steroids
    Dixon, C. Luke
    Too, Gloria
    Saade, George R.
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (13) : 1241 - 1250
  • [30] Antenatal late preterm steroids for twin pregnancies: a cost-effective analysis
    Zhou, Clarice G.
    Lee, Vanessa R.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S511 - S512