Prophylactic administration of tirofiban for preventing thromboembolic events in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms

被引:18
|
作者
Wu, Qiaowei
Shao, Qiuji
Li, Li
Liang, Xiaodong
Chang, Kaitao
Li, Tianxiao [1 ,2 ]
He, Yingkun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Peoples Hosp, Dept Cerebrovasc Dis, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ, Peoples Hosp, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
关键词
flow diverter; aneurysm; platelets; complication; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; RESCUE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; COMPLICATIONS; RISK; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016878
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Background Flow diverter (FD) is widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, thromboembolic events (TEs) continue to be the major complications during the periprocedural phase. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the prophylactic use of tirofiban, combined with the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT), as a new antiplatelet protocol in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs. Methods At least 3-5 days before the procedure, daily DAT were administrated to the patients. Tirofiban was administered as an intravenous bolus (5 mu g/kg) over a 3 min period during or immediately after FD deployment, followed by a 0.05 mu g/kg/min maintenance infusion for 24-48 hours. Periprocedural TEs and hemorrhagic events (HEs) were recorded. Results A total of 331 patients were included, including 229 (69.2%) who received tirofiban administration (tirofiban group) and 102 (30.8%) who received only DAT (non-tirofiban group). Periprocedural TEs occurred in 12 (3.6%) patients, including eight (7.8%) in the non-tirofiban group and four (1.7%) in the tirofiban group. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving tirofiban administration had significantly lower TEs as compared with those who received only DAT (P=0.004). Balloon angioplasty and longer procedure time (>137 min) were also risk factors for TEs. Also, no increase was observed in the rate of HEs related to tirofiban administration. Conclusions The current study suggested that prophylactic administration of tirofiban combined with conventional oral DAT seems safe and efficient for preventing TEs during FD treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Balloon angioplasty and prolonged procedure are associated with a high risk of TEs.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 840
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Flow Diversion for Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: Problem or Panacea?
    Ambekar, Sudheer
    Pandey, Paritosh
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2020, 68 (01) : 116 - 117
  • [32] Intravenous administration of tirofiban versus loading dose of oral clopidogrel for preventing thromboembolism in stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms
    Wang Zi-Liang
    Liang Xiao-Dong
    Li Tian-Xiao
    Zhu Liang-Fu
    Xue Jiang-Yu
    Bai Wei-Xing
    He Ying-Kun
    Xu Gang-Qin
    Shao Qiu-Ji
    Li Li
    Feng Guang
    Li Zhao-Shuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2017, 12 (05) : 553 - 559
  • [33] Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kashkoush, Ahmed
    El-Abtah, Mohamed Ehab
    Petitt, Jordan C.
    Glauser, Gregory
    Winkelman, Robert
    Achey, Rebecca L.
    Davison, Mark
    Abdulrazzak, Mohammad A.
    Hussain, Shazam M.
    Toth, Gabor
    Bain, Mark
    Moore, Nina
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [34] Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Campos, Jessica K.
    Lin, Li-Mei
    Beaty, Narlin B.
    Bender, Matthew T.
    Jiang, Bowen
    Zarrin, David A.
    Coon, Alexander L.
    STROKE AND VASCULAR NEUROLOGY, 2019, 4 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [36] Treatment of In-Stent Stenosis Following Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms with Cilostazol and Clopidogrel
    Dowlati, Ehsan
    Pasko, Kory B. Dylan
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Miller, Charles A.
    Felbaum, Daniel R.
    Sur, Samir
    Chang, Jason J.
    Liu, Ai-Hsi
    Armonda, Rocco A.
    Mai, Jeffrey C.
    NEUROINTERVENTION, 2021, 16 (03) : 285 - 292
  • [37] Pipeline-assisted coiling versus pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms
    Sweid, A.
    Atallah, E.
    Herial, N.
    Saad, H.
    Mouchtouris, N.
    Barros, G.
    Gooch, M. R.
    Tjoumakaris, S.
    Zarzour, H.
    Hasan, D.
    Chalouhi, N.
    Rosenwasser, R. H.
    Jabbour, P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 58 : 20 - 24
  • [38] Flow Diversion for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treatment: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review
    Giorgianni, Andrea
    Agosti, Edoardo
    Molinaro, Stefano
    Terrana, Alberto Vito
    Vizzari, Francesco Alberto
    Nativo, Luca
    Garg, Kanwaljeet
    Craparo, Giuseppe
    Conti, Vinicio
    Locatelli, Davide
    Baruzzi, Fabio
    Valvassori, Luca
    Lanzino, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2022, 31 (03):
  • [39] Timing of Thrombosis in Embolization of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Tirofiban as Rescue Treatment
    Lee, Dongwhane
    Lee, Deok Hee
    Park, Jung Cheol
    Shin, Jae Ho
    Song, Yunsun
    Chung, Jaewoo
    Sheen, Jae Jon
    Suh, Dae Chul
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (01) : 125 - 133
  • [40] Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment
    Thomas, Ajith J.
    Ogilvy, Christopher S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 : S1 - S2