Thrust Restraint of Buried Continuous Pressure Pipe Considering Pipe-Soil Interaction

被引:5
|
作者
Liu, Meng [1 ]
Ortega, Rafael [1 ]
机构
[1] Aurora Tech Serv LLC, 2121 Sage Rd, Aurora, CO 77056 USA
关键词
Pressure pipe; Pipe-soil interaction (PSI); Thrust restraint; Thrust block; Restrained joint; UNIFIED APPROACH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000577
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Design and analysis of thrust restraint for a buried continuous pressure pipe is essentially a pipe-soil interaction (PSI) problem regardless of pipe materials and restraint methods. In practice, thrust block and restrained joints are the most commonly used restraint methods, and dual restraint systems using both methods can be found in many pipeline projects even though they are treated independently. However, no analytical procedure is available to analyze the performance of such dual restraint systems. Therefore, a closed-form linear-elastic solution considering PSI is proposed to analyze pipes restrained with both thrust blocks and restrained joints or continuous pipes restrained with thrust blocks. The solution also considers the contribution of friction resistance due to increased normal pressure at the pipe-soil interface, as the pipe moves laterally into and longitudinally through soils simultaneously. The solution can be easily implemented by hand-calculation or a spreadsheet for various pipe material, geometry, and soil stiffness. The example provided demonstrates that the current guideline procedure overestimates the restraint length and underestimates the axial force slightly because the frictional resistance from lateral pipe movement is neglected. A comprehensive parametric study has been conducted to illustrate the effects of different design parameters on the internal forces, displacements, and restraint length of pipes. It is found that soil stiffness is the most critical parameter in resisting thrust force.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physical model tests of lateral pipe-soil interaction including the pipe trajectory in sand
    Wang, Le
    Wang, Yufei
    Peng, Biyao
    Ding, Hongyan
    Zhang, Puyang
    Liu, Run
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (05) : 1962 - 1976
  • [32] Axial pipe-soil interaction behaviour of offshore pipelines
    Senthilkumar, M.
    Kodikara, J.
    Rajeev, P.
    Robert, D.J.
    Australian Geomechanics Journal, 2013, 48 (04): : 123 - 136
  • [33] Deflection and buckling of buried flexible pipe-soil system in a spatially variable soil profile
    Srivastava, Amit
    Babu, G. L. Sivakumar
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2011, 3 (03) : 169 - 188
  • [34] NUMERICAL MODELING OF PIPE-SOIL INTERACTION UNDER TRANSVERSE DIRECTION
    Farhadi, Bahar
    Wong, Ron C. K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 1, 2014,
  • [35] PIPE SOIL INTERACTION FOR A BURIED OFFSHORE PIPELINE
    REESE, LC
    CASBARIA.AO
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1968, 20 (09): : 1002 - &
  • [36] Lateral pipe-soil interaction in sand with reference to scale effect
    Guo, PJ
    Stolle, DFE
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (03) : 338 - 349
  • [37] Apparatus for Measuring Pipe-Soil Interaction Behavior Using Shallow 'Pipe-like' Penetrometers
    Schneider, M. A.
    Stanier, S. A.
    White, D. J.
    Randolph, M. F.
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2020, 43 (03): : 622 - 640
  • [38] Soil Pressure and Pipe Deformation Measurements for Characterizing Flexible Pipe-Soil Systems under Shallow Cover
    Talesnick, Mark. L.
    Frydman, Sam
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [39] A REVIEW OF PIPE-SOIL INTERACTION MODELS FOR STRAIN DEMAND ESTIMATION
    Yu, Dunji
    Wang, Yong-Yi
    Liu, Banglin
    Chen, Xiaotong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE (IPC2020), VOL 2, 2020,
  • [40] Centrifuge modelling of pipe-soil interaction in clay with crust layer
    Hou, Zhechen
    Sahdi, Fauzan
    Gaudin, Christophe
    Randolph, Mark
    Marine Structures, 2021, 75