Communicating cardiovascular risk to high-risk cancer survivors: a mixed-methods pilot study of a statin risk communication tool

被引:1
|
作者
Raghunathan, Nirupa J. [1 ]
Zabor, Emily C. [2 ]
Anderson, Nassim [1 ]
Oeffinger, Kevin [3 ]
Tonorezos, Emily S. [1 ,4 ]
Korenstein, Deborah [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, 485 Lexington Ave,2nd Floor, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cardiovascular risk; Risk communication tools; Shared decision-making; Mixed-methods study; Decisional conflict; Statins; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; US ADULTS; PREVALENCE; FEATURES; STROKE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-020-00860-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors treated with radiation therapy (RT) may be unaware of their high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk or how to mitigate it. Tools are needed to improve understanding. We developed and pilot-tested a risk communication tool for shared decision-making with survivors regarding CVD risk reduction with statin therapy. We included quantitative and qualitative arms to further tool development and testing. Methods The statin risk communication tool was adapted from a previously validated tool. Patients were at increased risk for CVD due to history of chest RT and recruited to usual care and intervention arms. The post-visit survey included Likert-like scales to explore acceptability of the tool, knowledge questions, and a decisional conflict scale. This pilot study used descriptive statistics and was not powered for significance. Semi-structured interviews with intervention arm participants explored shared decision-making processes. Results Median participant (n = 46) age was 45. Most intervention patients (22/24, 92%) and 50% (11/22) of controls found statin information acceptable while 31% (7/22) of the control arm selected "not applicable" regarding information acceptability. Most participants were unaware of their personal CVD risk or potential statin side effects. In semi-structured interviews, participants found the tool is helpful to visualize risk and aid conversations. Conclusions The risk communication tool was acceptable. Qualitative data suggested the tool improved decisional clarity and comfort.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 423
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The plasma proteome as a cardiovascular disease risk assessment tool in cancer survivors
    Troth, Emma V.
    Ayala, Matthew
    Chadwick, Jessica
    Hales, Erin
    Hinterberg, Michael
    Kuzma, Jessica N.
    Paterson, Clare
    Ostroff, Rachel
    Walter, Joan E.
    Mueller, Christian
    Coresh, Josef
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [32] Cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric populations
    不详
    PEDIATRICS, 2007, 119 (03) : 618 - 621
  • [33] A communication aid to facilitate risk communication with women from high-risk breast cancer families
    Lobb, E
    Butow, P
    Tucker, K
    Barratt, A
    Kirk, J
    Dudding, T
    Gaff, C
    Butt, D
    Moore, A
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2003, 12 (04) : S258 - S258
  • [34] Cardiovascular risk and communication among early stage breast cancer survivors
    Christian, Allison H.
    O'Malley, Denalee
    Barac, Ana
    Miller, Suzanne M.
    Hudson, Shawna V.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (07) : 1360 - 1366
  • [35] Long-term cardiovascular risk prediction in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Reynard, Charles
    McMillan, Brian
    Jafar, Anisa
    Heagerty, Anthony
    Martin, Glen Philip
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    Body, Richard
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [36] Gamblers’ Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study
    David Forsström
    Alexander Rozental
    Emma Wiklund
    Per Carlbring
    Philip Lindner
    Journal of Gambling Studies, 2022, 38 : 591 - 606
  • [37] Gamblers' Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Forsstrom, David
    Rozental, Alexander
    Wiklund, Emma
    Carlbring, Per
    Lindner, Philip
    JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2022, 38 (02) : 591 - 606
  • [38] Melanoma risk stratification of individuals with a high-risk naevus phenotype - A pilot study
    Rishpon, Ayelet
    Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian
    Marghoob, Ashfaq A.
    Dusza, Stephen W.
    Isman, Gila
    Kose, Kivanc
    Halpern, Allan C.
    Marchetti, Michael A.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 60 (04) : E292 - E297
  • [39] Risk communication strategies (on listeriosis) for high-risk groups
    Maia, Rui Leandro
    Teixeira, Paula
    Mateus, Teresa Letra
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 84 : 68 - 70
  • [40] INFORMATICS TOOLS TO IMPLEMENT LATE CARDIOVASCULAR RISK PREDICTION MODELING FOR POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT OF HIGH-RISK CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVORS
    Noyd, David
    Janitz, Amanda
    Baker, Ashley
    Beasley, William
    Etzold, Nancy
    Kendrick, David
    Oeffinger, Kevin
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2022, 69