Communicating cardiovascular risk to high-risk cancer survivors: a mixed-methods pilot study of a statin risk communication tool

被引:1
|
作者
Raghunathan, Nirupa J. [1 ]
Zabor, Emily C. [2 ]
Anderson, Nassim [1 ]
Oeffinger, Kevin [3 ]
Tonorezos, Emily S. [1 ,4 ]
Korenstein, Deborah [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, 485 Lexington Ave,2nd Floor, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Taussig Canc Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cardiovascular risk; Risk communication tools; Shared decision-making; Mixed-methods study; Decisional conflict; Statins; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; US ADULTS; PREVALENCE; FEATURES; STROKE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11764-020-00860-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors treated with radiation therapy (RT) may be unaware of their high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk or how to mitigate it. Tools are needed to improve understanding. We developed and pilot-tested a risk communication tool for shared decision-making with survivors regarding CVD risk reduction with statin therapy. We included quantitative and qualitative arms to further tool development and testing. Methods The statin risk communication tool was adapted from a previously validated tool. Patients were at increased risk for CVD due to history of chest RT and recruited to usual care and intervention arms. The post-visit survey included Likert-like scales to explore acceptability of the tool, knowledge questions, and a decisional conflict scale. This pilot study used descriptive statistics and was not powered for significance. Semi-structured interviews with intervention arm participants explored shared decision-making processes. Results Median participant (n = 46) age was 45. Most intervention patients (22/24, 92%) and 50% (11/22) of controls found statin information acceptable while 31% (7/22) of the control arm selected "not applicable" regarding information acceptability. Most participants were unaware of their personal CVD risk or potential statin side effects. In semi-structured interviews, participants found the tool is helpful to visualize risk and aid conversations. Conclusions The risk communication tool was acceptable. Qualitative data suggested the tool improved decisional clarity and comfort.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 423
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Communicating cardiovascular risk to high-risk cancer survivors: a mixed-methods pilot study of a statin risk communication tool
    Nirupa J. Raghunathan
    Emily C. Zabor
    Nassim Anderson
    Kevin Oeffinger
    Emily S. Tonorezos
    Deborah Korenstein
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2020, 14 : 417 - 423
  • [2] Development of a statin risk communication tool for use in cancer survivors: A pilot.
    Raghunathan, Nirupa Jaya
    Korenstein, Deborah
    Anderson, Nassim
    Adsuar, Roberto
    Tonorezos, Emily S.
    Oeffinger, Kevin C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (05)
  • [3] Identifying and characterizing high-risk populations in pilot malaria elimination districts in Madagascar: a mixed-methods study
    Gebreegziabher, Elisabeth
    Raoliarison, Andry
    Ramananjato, Andrinirina
    Fanomezana, Andriamamonjy
    Rafaliarisoa, Martin
    Ralisata, Sandy
    Razafindrakoto, Jocelyn
    Smith, Jennifer
    Ahmed, Jehan
    Smith Gueye, Cara
    MALARIA JOURNAL, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [4] Value conflicts and information security - a mixed-methods study in high-risk industry
    Gyllensten, Kristina
    Pousette, Anders
    Torner, Marianne
    INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SECURITY, 2022, 30 (03) : 346 - 363
  • [5] Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Pilot Study
    Schlam, Ilana
    Debnath, Dipanjan
    Gallagher, Christopher
    Dilawari, Asma A.
    Tiwari, Shruti R.
    Aschalew, Malate
    Guebre-Xabiher, Hiwot
    Malloy, Stacy
    Graves, Kristi
    Barac, Ana
    Chitalia, Ami
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [6] Mixed-methods evaluation of the Perioperative Medicine Service for High-Risk Patients Implementation Pilot (POMSHIP): a study protocol
    Walker, David
    Wagstaff, Duncan
    McGuckin, Dermot
    Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia
    Swart, Nicholas
    Morris, Stephen
    Crowe, Sonya
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [7] Communicating about cancer risk in high-risk families: A comparison between breast and ovarian cancer survivors and their female relatives.
    Mellon, Suzanne
    Berry-Bobovski, Lisa
    Gold, Robin
    Janisse, James
    Tainsky, Michael
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2007, 34 (01) : 227 - 227
  • [8] Evaluation of a successful fluoroquinolone restriction intervention among high-risk patients: A mixed-methods study
    Tischendorf, Jessica
    Brunner, Matthew
    Knobloch, Mary Jo
    Schulz, Lucas
    Barker, Anna
    Wright, Marc-Oliver
    Lepak, Alexander
    Safdar, Nasia
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):
  • [9] AN INTEGRATED MIXED-METHODS STUDY EXPLORING COVID-19 RISK PERCEPTIONS AMONG HIGH-RISK RURAL ADULTS WITH MULTIMORBIDITY
    Kirk, Brenna O.
    Misra, Ranjita
    Lipinski, Sarah
    Chatterji, Mohini
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 57 : S416 - S416
  • [10] Risk for myopathy with statin therapy in high-risk patients
    Ballantyne, CM
    Corsini, A
    Davidson, MH
    Holdaas, H
    Jacobson, TA
    Leitersdorf, E
    März, W
    Reckless, JPD
    Stein, EA
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (05) : 553 - 564