Evaluation of a commercial electron treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo techniques (eMC)

被引:74
|
作者
Pemler, Peter [1 ]
Besserer, Juergen [1 ]
Schneider, Uwe [1 ]
Neuenschwander, Hans [2 ]
机构
[1] Stadtspital Triemli, Klin Radioonkol & Nukl Med, CH-8063 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Lindenhofspital, Klin Radioonkol, Bern, Switzerland
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK | 2006年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Monte Carlo; treatment planning; electrons; commissioning;
D O I
10.1078/0939-3889-00330
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A commercial electron beam treatment planning system on the basis of a Monte Carlo algorithm (Varian Eclipse, eMC V7.2.35) was evaluated. Measured dose distributions were used for comparison with dose distributions predicted by eMC calculations. Tests were carried out for various applicators and field sizes, irregular shaped cut outs and an inhomogeneity phantom for energies between 6 MeV and 22 MeV. Monitor units were calculated for all applicator/energy combinations and field sizes down to 3 cm diameter and source-to-surface distances of 100 cm and 110 cm. A mass-density-to-Hounsfield-Units calibration was performed to compare dose distributions calculated with a default and an individual calibration. The relationship between calculation parameters of the eMC and the resulting dose distribution was studied in detail. Finally, the algorithm was also applied to a clinical case (boost treatment of the breast) to reveal possible problems in the implementation. For standard geometries there was a good agreement between measurements and calculations, except for profiles for low energies (6 MeV) and high energies (18 MeV, 22 MeV), in which cases the algorithm overestimated the dose off-axis in the high-dose region. For energies of 12 MeV and higher, there were oscillations in the plateau region of the corresponding depth dose curves calculated with a grid size of 1 mm. With irregular cut outs, an overestimation of the dose was observed for small slits and low energies (4% for 6 MeV), as well as for asymmetric cases and extended source-to-surface distances (12% for SSD = 120 cm). While all monitor unit calculations for SSD = 100 cm were within 3% compared to measure-ments, there were large deviations for small cut outs and source-to-surface distances larger than 100 cm (7% for a 3 cm diameter cutout and a source-to-surface distance of 110 cm).
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 329
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monte Carlo based treatment planning for electron beams in breast radiotherapy.
    Esche, B
    Caudrelier, J
    Lochrin, C
    Cygler, JE
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 72 : S57 - S57
  • [42] Acceptance and Commissioning of a Treatment Planning System Based on Monte Carlo Calculations
    Lopez-Tarjuelo, J.
    Garcia-Molla, R.
    Juan-Senabre, X. J.
    Quiros-Higueras, J. D.
    Santos-Serra, A.
    de Marco-Blancas, N.
    Calzada-Feliu, S.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [43] Introduction of scoregrids into a Monte-Carlo based treatment planning system
    Reynaert, N
    De Smedt, B
    Thierens, H
    Coghe, M
    De Wagter, C
    De Neve, W
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S91 - S91
  • [44] Monte Carlo based treatment planning for modulated electron beam radiation therapy
    Lee, MC
    Deng, J
    Li, JS
    Jiang, SB
    Ma, CM
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (08): : 2177 - 2199
  • [45] Commissioning and Acceptance Testing of a Commercial Monte Carlo Electron Dose Calculation Model (eMC) for TrueBeam
    Sheu, R.
    Tseng, T.
    Powers, A.
    Lo, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 238 - 238
  • [46] Evaluation of the treatment planning system of the Cyberknife by means of a comparison to Monte Carlo calculation
    Cora, S
    Francescon, P
    Cavedon, C
    Avanzo, M
    Stancanello, J
    Scalchi, P
    Spezi, E
    Ferri, A
    Bergamini, C
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S96 - S96
  • [47] A radiosurgery Monte Carlo based treatment planning
    Chave, A
    Lopes, MC
    Oliveira, C
    Peralta, L
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S374 - S374
  • [48] Dosimetric evaluation of a Monte Carlo IMRT treatment planning system incorporating the MIMiC
    Rassiah-Szegedi, P.
    Fuss, M.
    Sheikh-Bagheri, D.
    Szegedi, M.
    Stathakis, S.
    Lancaster, J.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Salter, B.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (23): : 6931 - 6941
  • [49] Evaluation of the material assignment method used by a Monte Carlo treatment planning system
    Isambert, A.
    Brualla, L.
    Lefkopoulos, D.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2009, 13 (08): : 744 - 746
  • [50] Comparisons of clinical electron dose distributions between a commercial radiation treatment planning system and EGS4 Monte Carlo
    Holmes, M
    Mackie, TR
    Rogers, DWO
    Ding, G
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 1997, : 54 - 56