Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework

被引:85
|
作者
Annand, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Athabasca Univ, Athabasca, AB, Canada
关键词
Online learning; online pedagogy; communities of inquiry; distance education; constructivism; cohort-based learning; individualized learning; COGNITIVE PRESENCE; ONLINE;
D O I
10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The role of social presence as defined by the community of inquiry (CoI) framework is critiqued through a review of recent literature. Evidence is presented that questions the actual extent of knowledge co-construction that occurs in most higher education settings and therefore challenges the framework's underlying assumption of the need for sustained, contiguous, two-way communication in higher-level online learning environments. The CoI framework has evolved from the description of a learning process within a social constructivist paradigm to an empirically testable construct in an objectivist paradigm. Related research results indicate that social presence does not impact cognitive presence in a meaningful way and that best teaching practices suggested by CoI-based studies are informed by objectivist, cognitively oriented learning theories. These suggest that higher-order cognition may be achieved through wide and varied combinations of learner-teacher, learner-content, and learner-learner interaction. Controlled studies can and should be undertaken to compare learning outcomes using sustained, contiguous, two-way communication to other learning models. To facilitate this, subcategories of social and teaching presences need to be revamped and analysis adjusted to separate processes that support explicitly group-based learning activities from those used by individual students.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 56
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CRAFT AND COMMUNITY AS METAPHORS FOR SOCIAL INQUIRY CURRICULUM
    POPKEWITZ, TS
    EDUCATIONAL THEORY, 1977, 27 (04) : 310 - 321
  • [42] Improving Retention Factors and Student Success Online Utilizing the Community of Inquiry Framework's Instructor Presence Model
    Rosser-Majors, Michelle L.
    Rebeor, Sandra
    McMahon, Christine
    Wilson, Andrea
    Stubbs, Stephanie L.
    Harper, Yolanda
    Sliwinski, Laura
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2022, 26 (02): : 21 - 33
  • [43] THE COMMUNITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY AS A SOCIAL AND COGNITIVE MATRIX
    Striano, Maura
    CHILDHOOD AND PHILOSOPHY, 2011, 7 (13): : 91 - 102
  • [44] Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to Scaffold Online Tutoring
    Feng, Xiaoying
    Xie, Jingjing
    Liu, Yue
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2017, 18 (02): : 162 - 188
  • [45] Considering the Community of Inquiry Framework in Online Engineering Education
    Zhang, Yihua
    Stohr, Christian
    Jamsvi, Susanne Stromberg
    Kabo, Jens
    2022 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, FIE, 2022,
  • [46] Community of Inquiry Framework for Advanced Practice Nursing Students
    Padilla, Blanca Iris
    Kreider, Kathryn Evans
    JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2018, 14 (05): : E87 - E92
  • [47] Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample
    Arbaugh, J. B.
    Cleveland-Innes, Martha
    Diaz, Sebastian R.
    Garrison, D. Randy
    Ice, Philip
    Richardson, Jennifer C.
    Swan, Karen P.
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 11 (3-4): : 133 - 136
  • [48] Radical Constructivist Cooperative Inquiry Framework: Learning within Design
    Shokeen, Ekta
    Williams-Pierce, Caro
    PROCEEDINGS OF ACM INTERACTION DESIGN AND CHILDREN CONFERENCE, IDC 2024, 2024, : 70 - 82
  • [49] An Online English Learning Community for College Students Based on Community of Inquiry Framework
    Liao, Cuiying
    Tian, Lu
    LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS, ICWL 2020, SETE 2020, 2021, 12511 : 370 - 379
  • [50] Using the Community of Inquiry Survey to Assess Teaching, Social, and Cognitive Presence and Make Subsequent Improvements to Online Courses
    Sommers, Denise K.
    E-MENTOR, 2013, (05): : 83 - 86