Mapping Ultra-weak Protein-Protein Interactions between Heme Transporters of Staphylococcus aureus

被引:41
|
作者
Abe, Ryota [1 ,2 ]
Caaveiro, Jose M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Kozuka-Hata, Hiroko [2 ]
Oyama, Masaaki [2 ]
Tsumoto, Kouhei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Sch Frontier Sci, Dept Med Genome Sci, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Inst Med Sci, Med Prote Lab, Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088639, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
PHOTO-CROSS-LINKING; SURFACE PROTEIN; STRUCTURAL BASIS; UPTAKE SYSTEM; NEAT DOMAIN; IRON; ISD; DETERMINANT; RESISTANCE; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M112.346700
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Iron is an essential nutrient for the proliferation of Staphylococcus aureus during bacterial infections. The iron-regulated surface determinant (Isd) system of S. aureus transports and metabolizes iron porphyrin (heme) captured from the host organism. Transportation of heme across the thick cell wall of this bacterium requires multiple relay points. The mechanism by which heme is physically transferred between Isd transporters is largely unknown because of the transient nature of the interactions involved. Herein, we show that the IsdC transporter not only passes heme ligand to another class of Isd transporter, as previously known, but can also perform self-transfer reactions. IsdA shows a similar ability. A genetically encoded photoreactive probe was used to survey the regions of IsdC involved in self-dimerization. We propose an updated model that explicitly considers self-transfer reactions to explain heme delivery across the cell wall. An analogous photo-cross-linking strategy was employed to map transient interactions between IsdC and IsdE transporters. These experiments identified a key structural element involved in the rapid and specific transfer of heme from IsdC to IsdE. The resulting structural model was validated with a chimeric version of the homologous transporter IsdA. Overall, our results show that the ultra-weak interactions between Isd transporters are governed by bona fide protein structural motifs.
引用
收藏
页码:16477 / 16487
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Functional proteomics: Mapping protein-protein interactions and pathways
    Figeys, D
    CURRENT OPINION IN MOLECULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 4 (03) : 210 - 215
  • [22] Mapping protein-protein interactions in solution by NMR Spectroscopy
    Zuiderweg, ERP
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 41 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [23] Link between protein-solvent and weak protein-protein interactions gives insight into halophilic adaptation
    Costenaro, L
    Zaccai, G
    Ebel, C
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 41 (44) : 13245 - 13252
  • [24] Protein-protein interactions of drug uptake transporters that are important for liver and kidney
    Zhang, Yuchen
    Hagenbuch, Bruno
    BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 168 : 384 - 391
  • [25] Are weak protein-protein interactions the general rule in capsid assembly?
    Zlotnick, A
    VIROLOGY, 2003, 315 (02) : 269 - 274
  • [26] Rank-based interolog mapping for predicting protein-protein interactions between genomes
    Lo, Yu-Shu
    Chen, Chun-Chen
    Hsu, Kai-Cheng
    Yang, Jinn-Moon
    2013 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS BIOLOGY (ISB), 2013, : 55 - 62
  • [27] Protein-solvent and weak protein-protein interactions in halophilic malate dehydrogenase
    Ebel, C
    Faou, P
    Zaccai, G
    JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 1999, 196 (2-4) : 395 - 402
  • [28] Protein-protein interactions between sucrose transporters of different affinities colocalized in the same enucleate sieve element
    Reinders, A
    Schulze, W
    Kühn, C
    Barker, L
    Schulz, A
    Ward, JM
    Frommer, WB
    PLANT CELL, 2002, 14 (07): : 1567 - 1577
  • [29] Pan-cancer mapping of differential protein-protein interactions
    Gizem Gulfidan
    Beste Turanli
    Hande Beklen
    Raghu Sinha
    Kazim Yalcin Arga
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [30] Mapping, modeling, and characterization of protein-protein interactions on a proteomic scale
    Cafarelli, T. M.
    Desbuleux, A.
    Wang, Y.
    Choi, S. G.
    De Ridder, D.
    Vidal, M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 44 : 201 - 210