Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:50
|
作者
Boeck, Stefan [1 ]
Wilkowski, Ralf [3 ]
Bruns, Christiane J. [2 ]
Issels, Rolf D. [1 ,4 ]
Schulz, Christoph [1 ]
Moosmann, Nicolas [1 ]
Laessig, Dorit [1 ]
Haas, Michael [1 ]
Golf, Alexander [5 ]
Heinemann, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 3, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Surg, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Klin Bad Trissl, Oberaudorf, Germany
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Neuherberg, Germany
[5] Klinikum Stuttgart, Dept Med 1, Buergerhosp, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
capecitabine; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000127413
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To date, no standard regimen for salvage chemotherapy after gemcitabine (Gem) failure has been defined for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Oral capecitabine (Cap) has shown promising activity in first-line chemotherapy trials in PC patients. Methods: Within a prospective single-center study, Cap was offered to patients who had already received at least 1 previous treatment regimen containing full-dose Gem (as a single agent, as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen or sequentially within a chemoradiotherapy protocol). Cap was administered orally at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Study endpoints were objective tumor response rate by imaging criteria (according to RECIST), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) tumor marker response, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity. Results: A median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-36) was given to 39 patients. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months, 27 patients were evaluable for response: no complete or partial responses were observed, but 15 patients (39%) had stable disease. A CA19-9 reduction of >20% after 2 cycles of Cap was documented in 6 patients (15%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 0.5-45.1) and median overall survival (since start of Cap treatment) was 7.6 months (range 0.7-45.1). Predominant grade 2 and 3 toxicities (per patient analysis) were hand-foot syndrome 28% (13% grade 3); anemia 23%; leg edema 15%; diarrhea 13%; nausea/vomiting 10%, and leukocytopenia 10%. Conclusion: Single-agent Cap is a safe treatment option for Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC. Further evaluation of Cap in controlled clinical trials of Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC is recommended. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized phase II study of nalicap (nalIRI/capecitabine) compared to NAPOLI ( nal-IRI/5F-U/LV) in gemcitabine-pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer: Trial-in-progress
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Kim, Jin Won
    Lee, Myung Ah
    Kim, Ilhwan
    Lee, Choong-kun
    Seol, Young Mi
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Oh, Sang Cheul
    Bae, Woo Kyun
    Chon, Hongjae
    Choi, In Sil
    Yoon, Jeesun
    Park, Joon Oh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04)
  • [32] Second line with oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy for gemcitabine-pretreated pancreatic cancer: A systematic review
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Inno, Alessandro
    Ghidini, Antonio
    Rimassa, Lorenza
    Tomasello, Gianluca
    Labianca, Roberto
    Barni, Sandro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 81 : 174 - 182
  • [33] Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Cartwright, TH
    Cohn, A
    Varkey, JA
    Chen, YM
    Szatrowski, TP
    Cox, JV
    Schulz, JJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) : 160 - 164
  • [34] Phase II capecitabine and gemcitabine fixed dose rate (FDR) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Tonini, G.
    Vincenzi, B.
    Vasile, E.
    Catalano, V.
    Virzi, V.
    Fontana, A.
    Intagliata, S.
    Catalano, G.
    Falcone, A.
    Santini, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15)
  • [35] Phase II capecitabine and gemcitabine fixed dose rate (FDR) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Santini, D.
    Vincenzi, B.
    Masi, G.
    Catalano, V.
    Virzi, V.
    Fontana, A.
    Vasile, E.
    Intagliata, S.
    Catalano, G.
    Falcone, A.
    Tonini, G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [36] Phase II capecitabine and gemcitabine fixed dose rate (FDR) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Santini, D.
    Vincenzi, B.
    Masi, G.
    Catalano, V
    Virzi, V.
    Vasile, E.
    Fontana, A.
    Intagliata, S.
    Catalano, G.
    Falcone, A.
    Tonini, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : 59 - 60
  • [37] A phase II study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Hong Suk Song
    Young Rok Do
    Heung Moon Chang
    Min Hee Ryu
    Kyung Hee Lee
    Yeul Hong Kim
    Dae Sik Hong
    Jae Yong Cho
    Kyoung Eun Lee
    Si Young Kim
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2008, 62 : 763 - 768
  • [38] A phase II study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Song, Hong Suk
    Do, Young Rok
    Chang, Heung Moon
    Ryu, Min Hee
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Kim, Yeul Hong
    Hong, Dae Sik
    Cho, Jae Yong
    Lee, Kyoung Eun
    Kim, Si Young
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 62 (05) : 763 - 768
  • [39] PHASE II CAPECITABINE AND GEMCITABINE FIXED DOSE RATE (FDR) IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER
    Santini, D.
    Vincenzi, B.
    Masi, G.
    Catalano, V
    Virzi, V.
    Vasile, E.
    Fontana, A.
    Intagliata, S.
    Catalano, G.
    Falcone, A.
    Tonini, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 : 104 - 104
  • [40] METRONOMIC CAPECITABINE FOR PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER
    Shaltout, Ehab
    Abd El Razek, Eman
    El-Gamal, Ahmed
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 61 - 61