Gas production from layered methane hydrate reservoirs

被引:80
|
作者
Bhade, Piyush [1 ]
Phirani, Jyoti [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Chem Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Gas hydrates; Reservoir simulation; Heterogeneity; Layering; PRODUCTION BEHAVIOR; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; QILIAN MOUNTAIN; POROUS SEDIMENT; DEPRESSURIZATION; PERMAFROST; PRESSURE; DEPOSITS; WELL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.077
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Reservoir simulations are used to find the production strategies for methane gas hydrate reservoirs. Most of these simulation models assume homogeneous reservoirs in absence of substantial well data. Many natural gas hydrate reservoirs are heterogeneous. Majority of the heterogeneity comes from the depositional layering at different geological time scales. Examples are Mount Elbert, block 818 in Gulf of Mexico, Walker Ridge 313 Site. The effect of cross-flow or no cross-flow between the layers is still unknown. In the present work, layered gas hydrate reservoir, underlain by a confined aquifer, with cross-flow between the layers is studied. A 3-dimensional, multi-component, multiphase, thermal, compositional simulator developed by Sun and Mohanty (2005) is used. Earlier work showed that for a confined, homogeneous reservoir underlain by an aquifer layer, depressurization method gives the highest recovery. So, in the present work, only depressurization of the reservoir is considered. In layered reservoirs recovery is found to be dependent on the total volume of the hydrate present in the reservoir, depressurization potential of the reservoir and the enthalpy available for dissociation irrespective of the layering. The layering suggests the positions and progress of the dissociation fronts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 696
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Analytical solution for gas production from hydrate reservoirs underlain with free gas
    Tabatabaie, S. Hamed
    Pooladi-Darvish, Mehran
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2009, 1 (1-2) : 46 - 57
  • [22] The second offshore production of methane hydrate in the Nankai Trough and gas production behavior from a heterogeneous methane hydrate reservoir
    Yamamoto, K.
    Wang, X-X
    Tamaki, M.
    Suzuki, K.
    RSC ADVANCES, 2019, 9 (45) : 25987 - 26013
  • [23] Thermodynamic insights into the production of methane hydrate reservoirs from depressurization of pressure cores
    Phillips, Stephen C.
    Flemings, Peter B.
    You, Kehua
    Waite, William F.
    AAPG BULLETIN, 2022, 106 (05) : 1025 - 1049
  • [24] Simulation of natural gas production in hydrate reservoirs
    Hou, Liqun
    Wu, Yingxiang
    Cui, Bin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH (2006) ISOPE PACIFIC/ASIA OFFSHORE MECHANICS SYMPOSIUM (ISOPE PACOMES-2006), 2006, : 4 - +
  • [25] Research status and prospects of increasing production from gas hydrate reservoirs
    Sun J.
    Zhang L.
    Ning F.
    Liu T.
    Fang B.
    Li Y.
    Liu C.
    Jiang G.
    Shiyou Xuebao/Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42 (04): : 523 - 540
  • [26] Enhanced Gas Production from Hydrate Reservoirs with Underlying Water Layer
    Xu, Lei
    Shi, Kangji
    Lv, Xin
    Wei, Rupeng
    Fan, Qi
    Li, Qingping
    Dong, Hongsheng
    Zhao, Jiafei
    Yang, Lei
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 35 (02) : 1347 - 1357
  • [27] Gas Production from Fractured Hydrate Reservoirs: Numerical Modeling and Evaluation
    Han, Dongyan
    Wang, Ziming
    Xu, Aiguo
    ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [28] Assessment of methane gas production from Indian gas hydrate petroleum systems
    Vedachalam, N.
    Ramesh, S.
    Srinivasalu, S.
    Rajendran, G.
    Ramadass, G. A.
    Atmanand, M. A.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 168 : 649 - 660
  • [29] A numerical method for the gas production process in gas hydrate reservoirs
    Durgut, I
    Parlaktuna, M
    NGH '96 - 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL GAS HYDRATES, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 549 - 556
  • [30] Sensitivity Analysis of Parameters Governing the Recovery of Methane from Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoirs
    Giraldo, Carlos
    Klump, Jens
    Clarke, Matthew
    Schicks, Judith M.
    ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (04): : 2148 - 2176