Needs assessment instruments for family caregivers of cancer patients receiving palliative care: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Cheng, Qinqin [1 ]
Xu, Binbin [1 ]
Ng, Marques S. N. [1 ]
Zheng, Hongling [2 ]
So, Winnie K. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Nethersole Sch Nursing, Shatin, 7-F Esther Lee Bldg, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Sch Nursing, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Needs assessment; Instruments; Family caregivers; Cancer; Palliative care; Systematic review; UNMET NEEDS; INFORMAL CAREGIVERS; REPORTED OUTCOMES; INVENTORY; END; VALIDATION; SURVIVORS; LIFE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-022-07122-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Family caregivers of palliative cancer patients experience various supportive care needs. Appropriate self-reported instruments with robust psychological properties are required to identify these needs of family caregivers. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to identify self-reported supportive care needs assessment instruments for family caregivers of palliative cancer patients and assess their contents, psychometric properties, and applicability. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in six English databases and four Chinese databases from inception to October 2020 and updated in June 2021. The instruments identified were evaluated using an 18-item checklist consisting of six domains: conceptual model, content validity, reliability, construct validity, scoring and interpretation, and respondent burden and presentation. Results Six articles, describing four self-reported needs assessment instruments, were included in the review. These instruments varied significantly in terms of contents, constructs, scoring methods, and applicability. Three of these instruments were developed to assess the comprehensive supportive care needs of family caregivers, while one was specifically developed to assess the spiritual needs of family caregivers. With respect to psychometric properties, none of the instruments identified met all the criteria. Three major shortcomings were identified, namely, lack of longitudinal validity, lack of a strategy for interpreting missing data, and lack of a description of the literacy level required to understand the questions. Additionally, the instrument development processes assessed in this study lacked qualitative elements. Conclusions End-users need to consider contents, psychometric properties, and applicability when choosing an appropriate needs assessment instrument according to individual purpose and context. Further evaluation or development of needs assessment for the family caregivers of palliative cancer patients is needed, with a particular emphasis on caregivers' perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:8441 / 8453
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Evidence Supporting Educational Videos for Patients and Caregivers Receiving Hospice and Palliative Care: A Systematic Review
    Pacheco, A. L.
    Cruz, D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 : S274 - S275
  • [22] Quality of life and burden in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care
    Kocak, Nesteren
    Senel, Gulcin
    Oguz, Gonca
    Karaca, Serife
    Gokse, Fatih
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 59 (02) : 187 - 193
  • [23] INTERVENTIONS FOR FAMILY CAREGIVERS RECEIVING PALLIATIVE/HOSPICE CARE AT HOME: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Park, Taeyoung
    Alshakhs, Sulaiman
    Sweet, Elisabeth
    McDarby, Meghan
    Czaja, Sara
    Reid, Cary
    Adelman, Ronald
    Phongtankuel, Veerawat
    INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 861 - 862
  • [24] Instruments for Measuring the Burden of Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Zhou, Yue
    Zhang, Jie
    Pan, Yufan
    Dai, Yu
    Sun, Yujian
    Xiao, Yi
    Tang, Fuyou
    Yu, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [25] Assessment and management of constipation for patients receiving palliative care in specialist palliative care settings: A systematic review of the literature
    Muldrew, Deborah H. L.
    Hasson, Felicity
    Carduff, Emma
    Clarke, Mike
    Coast, Jo
    Finucane, Anne
    Graham, Lisa
    Larkin, Philip
    McCorry, Noleen K.
    Slater, Paul
    Watson, Max
    Wright, Eileen
    McIlfatrick, Sonja
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 32 (05) : 930 - 938
  • [26] A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
    Kia Toft Thomsen
    Mai-Britt Guldin
    Mette Kjærgaard Nielsen
    Chaitali Laura Ollars
    Anders Bonde Jensen
    BMC Palliative Care, 16
  • [27] A process evaluation of systematic risk and needs assessment for caregivers in specialised palliative care
    Thomsen, Kia Toft
    Guldin, Mai-Britt
    Nielsen, Mette Kjaergaard
    Ollars, Chaitali Laura
    Jensen, Anders Bonde
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2017, 16
  • [28] Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
    Tao Wang
    Alex Molassiotis
    Betty Pui Man Chung
    Jing-Yu Tan
    BMC Palliative Care, 17
  • [29] Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review
    Wang, Tao
    Molassiotis, Alex
    Chung, Betty Pui Man
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2018, 17 : 1 - 29
  • [30] Palliative care needs of the cancer patients receiving active therapy
    Gülcan Bağçivan
    Memnun Seven
    Şeyma İnciser Paşalak
    Ezgi Bilmiç
    Yasemin Aydın
    Gözde Öz
    Fatih Selçukbiricik
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 749 - 756