The ACCESS study a Zelen randomised controlled trial of a treatment package including problem solving therapy compared to treatment as usual in people who present to hospital after self-harm: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

被引:3
|
作者
Hatcher, Simon [1 ]
Sharon, Cynthia [1 ]
House, Allan [2 ]
Collings, Sunny [3 ]
Parag, Varsha [4 ]
Collins, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Psychol Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland 1, New Zealand
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Otago, Social Psychiat & Populat Mental Hlth Res Unit, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Univ Auckland, Clin Trials Res Unit, Sch Populat Hlth, Auckland 1, New Zealand
来源
TRIALS | 2011年 / 12卷
关键词
ATTEMPTED-SUICIDE; INTERVENTION; HOPELESSNESS; DEPRESSION; ATTEMPTERS; SERVICES; SCALE;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-12-135
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: People who present to hospital after intentionally harming themselves pose a common and important problem. Previous reviews of interventions have been inconclusive as existing trials have been under powered and done on unrepresentative populations. These reviews have however indicated that problem solving therapy and regular written communications after the self-harm attempt may be an effective treatment. This protocol describes a large pragmatic trial of a package of measures which include problem solving therapy, regular written communication, patient support, cultural assessment, improved access to primary care and a risk management strategy in people who present to hospital after self-harm using a novel design. Methods: We propose to use a double consent Zelen design where participants are randomised prior to giving consent to enrol a large representative cohort of patients. The main outcome will be hospital attendance following repetition of self-harm, in the 12 months after recruitment with secondary outcomes of self reported self-harm, hopelessness, anxiety, depression, quality of life, social function and hospital use at three months and one year. Discussion: A strength of the study is that it is a pragmatic trial which aims to recruit large numbers and does not exclude people if English is not their first language. A potential limitation is the analysis of the results which is complex and may underestimate any effect if a large number of people refuse their consent in the group randomised to problem solving therapy as they will effectively cross over to the treatment as usual group. However the primary analysis is a true intention to treat analysis of everyone randomised which includes both those who consent and do not consent to participate in the study. This provides information about how the intervention will work in practice in a representative population which is a major advance in this study compared to what has been done before.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomised controlled trial of a psychotherapeutic intervention to improve quality of life and other outcomes in people who repeatedly self-harm: FReSH START study protocol
    Farley, K.
    Copsey, B.
    Wright-Hughes, A.
    Farrin, A.
    Bojke, C.
    McMillan, D.
    Graham, C. D.
    Mattock, R.
    Brennan, C. A.
    Gates, C.
    Martin, A.
    Dowse, A.
    Horrocks, J.
    House, A. O.
    Guthrie, E. A.
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [22] Beating Adolescent Self-Harm (BASH): a randomised controlled trial comparing usual care versus usual care plus a smartphone self-harm prevention app (BlueIce) in young adolescents aged 12-17 who self-harm: study protocol
    Greenhalgh, Isobel
    Tingley, Jessica
    Taylor, Gordon
    Medina-Lara, Antonieta
    Rhodes, Shelley
    Stallard, P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [23] A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Sonia Johnson
    Luke Sheridan Rains
    Steven Marwaha
    John Strang
    Thomas Craig
    Tim Weaver
    Paul McCrone
    Michael King
    David Fowler
    Stephen Pilling
    Louise Marston
    Rumana Z. Omar
    Meghan Craig
    Mark Hinton
    Trials, 17
  • [24] Body therapy versus treatment as usual among Danish veterans with PTSD: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial combined with a qualitative study
    Ahlmark, Nanna Gram
    Dahl, Anders
    Andersen, Henrik Steen
    Tjornhoj-Thomsen, Tine
    Andersen, Susan
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 19
  • [25] A randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a contingency management intervention compared to treatment as usual for reduction of cannabis use and of relapse in early psychosis (CIRCLE): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Johnson, Sonia
    Rains, Luke Sheridan
    Marwaha, Steven
    Strang, John
    Craig, Thomas
    Weaver, Tim
    McCrone, Paul
    King, Michael
    Fowler, David
    Pilling, Stephen
    Marston, Louise
    Omar, Rumana Z.
    Craig, Meghan
    Hinton, Mark
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [26] MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
    Collinson, Michelle
    Owens, David
    Blenkiron, Paul
    Burton, Kayleigh
    Graham, Liz
    Hatcher, Simon
    House, Allan
    Martin, Katie
    Pembroke, Louise
    Protheroe, David
    Tubeuf, Sandy
    Farrin, Amanda
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [27] Palin Stuttering Therapy for School aged Children and usual treatment: A randomised controlled trial feasibility study
    Millard, S. K.
    Murphy, S.
    Barton, G.
    Rixon, L.
    Shepstone, L.
    Sims, E.
    Joffe, V.
    JOURNAL OF FLUENCY DISORDERS, 2025, 84
  • [28] MIDSHIPS: Multicentre Intervention Designed for Self-Harm using Interpersonal Problem-Solving: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study
    Michelle Collinson
    David Owens
    Paul Blenkiron
    Kayleigh Burton
    Liz Graham
    Simon Hatcher
    Allan House
    Katie Martin
    Louise Pembroke
    David Protheroe
    Sandy Tubeuf
    Amanda Farrin
    Trials, 15
  • [29] Randomized controlled trial of brief cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual in recurrent deliberate self-harm:: the POPMACT study
    Tyrer, P
    Thompson, S
    Schmidt, U
    Jones, V
    Knapp, M
    Davidson, K
    Catalan, J
    Airlie, J
    Baxter, S
    Byford, S
    Byrne, G
    Cameron, S
    Caplan, R
    Cooper, S
    Ferguson, B
    Freeman, C
    Frost, S
    Godley, J
    Greenshields, J
    Henderson, J
    Holden, N
    Keech, P
    Kim, L
    Logan, K
    Manley, C
    MacLeod, A
    Murphy, R
    Patience, L
    Ramsay, L
    De Munroz, S
    Scott, J
    Seivewright, H
    Sivakumar, K
    Tata, P
    Thornton, S
    Ukoumunne, OC
    Wessely, S
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (06) : 969 - 976
  • [30] ASSERTIVE OUTREACH TREATMENT FOR PEOPLE WITH FREQUENT HOSPITAL ATTENDANCES FOR ALCOHOL RELATED HARM: RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Kimergard, A.
    Wolstenholme, A.
    Coulton, S.
    Deluca, P.
    Drummond, C.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 44 : 160 - 160