Social-ecological system approaches for water resources management

被引:41
|
作者
Gain, Animesh K. [1 ,2 ]
Hossain, Md. Sarwar [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Benson, David [4 ,5 ]
Di Baldassarre, Giuliano [6 ,7 ]
Giupponi, Carlo [2 ]
Huq, Nazmul [8 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Environm Policy & Planning EPP Grp, Dept Urban Studies & Planning DUSP, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Ca Foscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Venice, Italy
[3] Univ Glasgow, Sch Interdisciplinary Studies, Dumfries, Scotland
[4] Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst ESI, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, England
[5] Univ Exeter, Dept Polit, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, England
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] CNDS, Ctr Nat Hazards & Disaster Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Koln Univ Appl Sci, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Social-ecological systems (SES); attributes; methods; water management paradigms; feedback; non-linearity; ENERGY-FOOD NEXUS; ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION; RIVER-BASIN; INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT; HYDROLOGY; FRAMEWORK; DECISION; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPLEMENTATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1080/13504509.2020.1780647
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the era of the Anthropocene, understanding the dynamic interactions between humans and water is crucial for supporting both human well-being and the sustainable management of resources. The current water management challenges are inherently unpredictable and difficult to control. Social-ecological systems (SESs) approaches explicitly recognize the connections and feedbacks between human and natural systems. For addressing the complex challenges of the Anthropocene, consideration of SES attributes such as causality (or interdependence), feedback, non-linearity, heterogeneity, and cross-scale dynamics is important. In addition, innovative qualitative and quantitative methods such as Bayesian networks, agent-based modelling, system dynamics, network analysis, multicriteria analysis, integrated assessment and role-play games have recently been used in SES research. The overall goal of this review is to gauge the extent to which SES attributes and methods are considered within the current interdisciplinary water paradigm. The paper therefore develops the normative theoretical characteristics of SES in terms of its key attributes (i.e. causality, feedback, heterogeneity, nonlinearity, and cross-scale dynamics) incorporated in the water paradigm approaches. The paper then compares the methods applied in the interdisciplinary water paradigm and examines how they can complement each other. Finally, the paper reflects back on the usefulness of SES attributes and methods for assessing the interdisciplinary water paradigm and makes recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 124
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems
    Pretty, Jules
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (02) : 127 - 139
  • [42] Complex Rangeland Systems: Integrated Social-Ecological Approaches to Silvopastoralism
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Huntsinger, Lynn
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 (05) : 519 - 525
  • [43] The Moku System: Managing Biocultural Resources for Abundance within Social-Ecological Regions in Hawai'i
    Winter, Kawika B.
    Beamer, Kamanamaikalani
    Vaughan, Mehana Blaich
    Friedlander, Alan M.
    Kido, Mike H.
    Whitehead, A. Namaka
    Akutagawa, Malia K. H.
    Kurashima, Natalie
    Lucas, Matthew Paul
    Nyberg, Ben
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (10)
  • [44] Application of the Ostrom framework in the analysis of a social-ecological system with multiple resources in a marine protected area
    Palomo, Leopoldo E.
    Hernandez-Flores, Alvaro
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [45] Social-ecological connections across land, water, and sea demand a reprioritization of environmental management
    Gladstone-Gallagher, Rebecca, V
    Tylianakis, Jason M.
    Yletyinen, Johanna
    Dakos, Vasilis
    Douglas, Emily J.
    Greenhalgh, Suzie
    Hewitt, Judi E.
    Hikuroa, Daniel
    Lade, Steven J.
    Le Heron, Richard
    Norkko, Alf
    Perry, George L. W.
    Pilditch, Conrad A.
    Schiel, David
    Siwicka, Ewa
    Warburton, Helen
    Thrush, Simon F.
    ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [46] Holistic management approach for social-ecological systems in Iran
    Kolahi, Mahdi
    Abdollahzadeh, Amir Hossein
    Noori, Roohollah
    ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 2025, 33
  • [47] HIV Management Within Changing Social-Ecological Systems
    King, Brian
    Rishworth, Andrea
    Winchester, Margaret S.
    Ngubane, Wendy
    Nobela, Golden
    Nsimbini, Tsakani
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2023, 51 (01) : 137 - 149
  • [48] Social networks and transformative behaviours in a grassland social-ecological system
    Nesbitt, Holly K.
    Metcalf, Alexander L.
    Floyd, Theresa M.
    Uden, Daniel R.
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Gulab, Sabrina
    Banerjee, Simanti
    Vallury, Sechindra
    Hamlin, Samantha L.
    Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
    Fogarty, Dillon T.
    Twidwell, Dirac
    Allen, Craig R.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (05) : 1877 - 1892
  • [49] Forest landscapes as social-ecological systems and implications for management
    Fischer, Alexandra Paige
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 177 : 138 - 147
  • [50] Woody encroachment: social-ecological impacts and sustainable management
    Ding, Jingyi
    Eldridge, David J.
    BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2024, 99 (06) : 1909 - 1926