The contribution of group prenatal care to maternal psychological health outcomes: A systematic review

被引:14
|
作者
Buultjens, Melissa [1 ]
Farouque, Ambereen [1 ]
Karimi, Leila [1 ]
Whitby, Linda [4 ]
Milgrom, Jeannette [2 ,3 ]
Erbas, Bircan [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Parent Infant Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Univ Lib Res, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
Group pregnancy care; Perinatal; Depression; Anxiety; Stress; Group prenatal care; Randomized controlled trial; Observational study; ANTENATAL CARE; CENTERING PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BIRTH-WEIGHT; DEPRESSION; WOMEN; RISK; PREVALENCE; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Problem: Poor mental health remains a significant cause of morbidity for childbearing women globally. Background: Group care has been shown to be effective in reducing select clinical outcomes, e.g., the rate of preterm birth, but less is known about the effect of Group Prenatal Care (GPC) on mental health outcomes of stress, depression and anxiety in pregnant women. Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the current evidence of the effect of group pregnancy care on mental health and wellbeing outcomes (i.e., stress, depression and/or anxiety) in childbearing women. Methods: A comprehensive search of published studies in Medline, PsychInfo, CINAHL, ProQuest databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Databases were systematically searched without publication period restriction until Feb 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (including quasi-experimental) and observational studies comparing group care with standard pregnancy care. Included were studies published in English, whose primary outcome measures were stress, depression and/or anxiety. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials and four observational studies, involving 1585 women (39%) in GPC and 2456 women (61%) in standard (individual) pregnancy care. Although evidence is limited, where targeted education was integrated into the group pregnancy care model, significant reductions in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, secondary analysis across several studies identified a subset of GPC women, i.e., higher risk for psychological symptoms, who reported a decrease in their depression, stress and anxiety symptoms, postpartum. Due to the diversity of group care structure and content and the lack of outcomes measures universally reported, a comprehensive meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusion: The evidence suggests improvements in some markers of psychological health outcomes with group pregnancy care. Future research should involve larger well-designed studies encompassing cross-population data using a validated scale that is comparable across diverse childbearing populations and clinical settings to better understand the impact of group pregnancy care. (c) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E631 / E642
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural racism and adverse maternal health outcomes: A systematic review
    Hailu, Elleni M.
    Maddali, Sai Ramya
    Snowden, Jonathan M.
    Carmichael, Suzan L.
    Mujahid, Mahasin S.
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2022, 78
  • [22] Psychosocial outcomes of group prenatal care
    Boothe, Emily
    Olenderek, Marta
    Noyola, M. Cristina
    Rushing, Julia
    Allred, Erinn
    Kaplan, Sebastian
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2022, 30 (06): : 1373 - 1380
  • [23] A Systematic Review of Bereaved Parents' Physical and Psychological Health Outcomes
    Dias, Nancy
    Grossoehme, Daniel
    Friebert, Sarah
    Guard, Kaitlin
    Hendricks-Ferguson, Verna
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (06) : 1152 - 1153
  • [24] PRENATAL-CARE AND MATERNAL HEALTH DURING ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY - A REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS
    SCHOLL, TO
    HEDIGER, ML
    BELSKY, DH
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1994, 15 (06) : 444 - 456
  • [25] Effect of Health Insurance on the Use and Provision of Maternal Health Services and Maternal and Neonatal Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Comfort, Alison B.
    Peterson, Lauren A.
    Hatt, Laurel E.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2013, 31 (04) : 81 - 105
  • [26] A Systematic Review of Maternal Confidence for Physiologic Birth: Characteristics of Prenatal Care and Confidence Measurement
    Avery, Melissa D.
    Saftner, Melissa A.
    Larson, Bridget
    Weinfurter, Elizabeth V.
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (06) : 586 - 595
  • [27] Retrospective Review of Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes in a Group of Uninsured Pregnant Women
    Jarvis, Catherine
    Munoz, Marie
    Graves, Lisa
    Stephenson, Randolph
    D'Souza, Vinita
    Jimenez, Vania
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2011, 33 (03) : 235 - 243
  • [28] Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chowdhury, Ranadip
    Sinha, Bireshwar
    Sankar, Mari Jeeva
    Taneja, Sunita
    Bhandari, Nita
    Rollins, Nigel
    Bahl, Rajiv
    Martines, Jose
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2015, 104 : 96 - 113
  • [29] Maternal psychological distress during pregnancy and childhood health outcomes: a narrative review
    Vehmeijer, F. O. L.
    Guxens, M.
    Duijts, L.
    El Marroun, H.
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL ORIGINS OF HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2019, 10 (03) : 274 - 285
  • [30] Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Group Versus Individual Prenatal Care: A New Experience in Iran
    Jafari, Fatemeh
    Eftekhar, Hasan
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    Mohammad, Kazem
    Hantoushzadeh, Sedigheh
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 31 (07) : 571 - 584