The contribution of group prenatal care to maternal psychological health outcomes: A systematic review

被引:14
|
作者
Buultjens, Melissa [1 ]
Farouque, Ambereen [1 ]
Karimi, Leila [1 ]
Whitby, Linda [4 ]
Milgrom, Jeannette [2 ,3 ]
Erbas, Bircan [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] Parent Infant Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Univ Lib Res, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
关键词
Group pregnancy care; Perinatal; Depression; Anxiety; Stress; Group prenatal care; Randomized controlled trial; Observational study; ANTENATAL CARE; CENTERING PREGNANCY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BIRTH-WEIGHT; DEPRESSION; WOMEN; RISK; PREVALENCE; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2020.12.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Problem: Poor mental health remains a significant cause of morbidity for childbearing women globally. Background: Group care has been shown to be effective in reducing select clinical outcomes, e.g., the rate of preterm birth, but less is known about the effect of Group Prenatal Care (GPC) on mental health outcomes of stress, depression and anxiety in pregnant women. Aim: To conduct a systematic review of the current evidence of the effect of group pregnancy care on mental health and wellbeing outcomes (i.e., stress, depression and/or anxiety) in childbearing women. Methods: A comprehensive search of published studies in Medline, PsychInfo, CINAHL, ProQuest databases, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Databases were systematically searched without publication period restriction until Feb 2020. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (including quasi-experimental) and observational studies comparing group care with standard pregnancy care. Included were studies published in English, whose primary outcome measures were stress, depression and/or anxiety. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials and four observational studies, involving 1585 women (39%) in GPC and 2456 women (61%) in standard (individual) pregnancy care. Although evidence is limited, where targeted education was integrated into the group pregnancy care model, significant reductions in depressive symptoms were observed. In addition, secondary analysis across several studies identified a subset of GPC women, i.e., higher risk for psychological symptoms, who reported a decrease in their depression, stress and anxiety symptoms, postpartum. Due to the diversity of group care structure and content and the lack of outcomes measures universally reported, a comprehensive meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusion: The evidence suggests improvements in some markers of psychological health outcomes with group pregnancy care. Future research should involve larger well-designed studies encompassing cross-population data using a validated scale that is comparable across diverse childbearing populations and clinical settings to better understand the impact of group pregnancy care. (c) 2020 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E631 / E642
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Group Prenatal Care and Maternal Outcomes A Scoping Review
    Tucker, Curisa M.
    Felder, Tisha M.
    Dail, Robin B.
    Lyndon, Audrey
    Allen, Kari-Claudia
    MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2021, 46 (06) : 314 - 322
  • [2] Group Prenatal Visits: Maternal and Neonatal Health Outcomes
    Groskaufmanis, Lauren
    Huber, Larissa R. Brunner
    Vick, Tara
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 63 (05) : 584 - 592
  • [3] Prenatal and Postpartum Maternal Psychological Distress and Infant Development: A Systematic Review
    Kingston, Dawn
    Tough, Suzanne
    Whitfield, Heather
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 43 (05) : 683 - 714
  • [4] Prenatal and Postpartum Maternal Psychological Distress and Infant Development: A Systematic Review
    Dawn Kingston
    Suzanne Tough
    Heather Whitfield
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2012, 43 : 683 - 714
  • [5] Prenatal exposure to cannabis and maternal and child health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gunn, J. K. L.
    Rosales, C. B.
    Center, K. E.
    Nunez, A.
    Gibson, S. J.
    Christ, C.
    Ehiri, J. E.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (04):
  • [6] Associations between prenatal sleep and psychological health: a systematic review
    Pauley, Abigail M.
    Moore, Ginger A.
    Mama, Scherezade K.
    Molenaar, Peter
    Downs, Danielle Symons
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2020, 16 (04): : 619 - 630
  • [7] Group Prenatal Care Versus Individual Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Ruiz-Mirazo, Eider
    Lopez-Yarto, Maite
    McDonald, Sarah D.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2012, 34 (03) : 223 - 229
  • [8] Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ickovics, Jeannette
    Lewis, Jessica
    Kershaw, Trace
    Magriples, Urania
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (01): : 203 - 204
  • [9] Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Yorga, Kim Weber
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (02): : 383 - 384
  • [10] Group Prenatal Care Compared With Traditional Prenatal Care A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Carter, Ebony B.
    Temming, Lorene A.
    Akin, Jennifer
    Fowler, Susan
    Macones, George A.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 128 (03): : 551 - 561