Splenic artery aneurysm: value of color Doppler and the limitation of gray-scale ultrasonography

被引:7
|
作者
Ishida, H
Konno, K
Hamashima, Y
Naganuma, H
Komatsuda, T
Ohyama, Y
Ishida, J
Masamune, O
机构
[1] Akita Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med 1, Akita 010, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 160, Japan
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 1998年 / 23卷 / 06期
关键词
color Doppler; splenic artery; aneurysm; ultrasound; collaterals (splenorenal shunt);
D O I
10.1007/s002619900418
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To reevaluate the advantages and limitations of gray-scale and color Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of splenic artery (Sp-A) aneurysm. Methods: We reviewed the gray-scale and color Doppler sonogram's of five cases with Sp-A aneurysm (four patients with portal hypertension and one patient without portal hypertension). Color Doppler sonography was performed in all five:patients, and power Doppler sonography was performed in three. Results: Gray-scale. sonography failed to detect the aneurysm in four of five cases because of a surrounding splenorenal (Sp-R) shunt in three patients and marked calcification of the aneurysmal wall in one-patient. Pulsed Doppler sonography showed a slightly turbulent pulsatile-flow :along the aneurysmal wall, which immediately led to the diagnosis:in four cases, including the three cases with Sp-R shunt, In one case, color Doppler sonography failed to detect the aneurysm because of a markedly calcified aneurysmal wall, although power Doppler sonography could visualize the aneurysm. Conclusions: Gray-scale sonography is not a useful diagnostic tool for Sp-A aneurysm. Clinicians should use color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of the splenic hilus in patients with Sp-R shunt to find a small Sp-A aneurysm. The addition of power Doppler sonography is helpful in visualizing calcified Sp-A aneurysms
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 632
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An effective color scale for simultaneous color and gray-scale publications
    McNames, J
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2006, 23 (01) : 82 - 87
  • [42] GRAY-SCALE AND ACHROMATIC COLOR DIFFERENCE
    CARTER, R
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1993, 10 (06): : 1380 - 1391
  • [43] GRAY-SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY OF NORMAL FEMALE PELVIS
    SAMPLE, WF
    LIPPE, BM
    GYEPES, MT
    RADIOLOGY, 1977, 125 (02) : 477 - 483
  • [44] GRAY-SCALE ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF CARCINOMA OF THE GALLBLADDER
    DALLAPALMA, L
    RIZZATTO, G
    POZZIMUCELLI, RS
    BAZZOCCHI, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1980, 53 (631): : 662 - 667
  • [45] Diagnostic Performances of Various Gray-Scale, Color Doppler, and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Findings in Predicting Malignant Thyroid Nodules
    Ma, Jiao-jiao
    Ding, Hong
    Xu, Ben-hua
    Xu, Chen
    Song, Lu-jun
    Huang, Bei-jian
    Wang, Wen-ping
    THYROID, 2014, 24 (02) : 355 - 363
  • [46] Diagnosis of thyroid cancer in children: Value of gray-scale and power Doppler US
    Lyshchik, A
    Drozd, V
    Demidchik, Y
    Reiners, C
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) : 604 - 613
  • [47] Accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers as predictors of prostate carcinoma
    Frauscher, F
    Halpern, EJ
    Klauser, A
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (01) : 282 - 283
  • [48] LAPAROSCOPIC GRAY-SCALE AND COLOR DOPPLER US - PRELIMINARY ANIMAL AND CLINICAL-STUDIES
    LIU, JB
    FELD, RI
    GOLDBERG, BB
    BARBOT, DJ
    NAZARIAN, LN
    MERTON, DA
    RAWOOL, NM
    ROSATO, FE
    WINKEL, CA
    GILLUM, DR
    VERNICK, JJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) : 851 - 857
  • [49] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography compared to gray-scale and power doppler in the diagnosis of peripheral lymphadenopathy
    Slaisova, Radka
    Benda, Karel
    Jarkovsky, Jiri
    Petrasova, Hana
    Szturz, Petr
    Valek, Vlastimil
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (04) : 693 - 698
  • [50] Predictors of prostate carcinoma: Accuracy of gray-scale and color Doppler US and serum markers
    Kuligowska, E
    Barish, MA
    Fenlon, HM
    Blake, M
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) : 757 - 764