Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning

被引:54
|
作者
Miyamoto, Yohsuke R. [1 ]
Wang, Shengxin [2 ]
Smith, Maurice A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, John A Paulson Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Dept Mechatron Engn, Harbin, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard Univ, Ctr Brain Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SIGNAL-DEPENDENT NOISE; SENSORIMOTOR SKILL; INTERNAL-MODELS; MEMORY-SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; TRAJECTORIES; ACQUISITION; PREDICTION; EXECUTION; EXPERTISE;
D O I
10.1038/s41593-020-0600-3
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Sports are replete with strategies, yet coaching lore often emphasizes 'quieting the mind', 'trusting the body' and 'avoiding overthinking' in referring to the importance of relying less on high-level explicit strategies in favor of low-level implicit motor learning. We investigated the interactions between explicit strategy and implicit motor adaptation by designing a sensorimotor learning paradigm that drives adaptive changes in some dimensions but not others. We find that strategy and implicit adaptation synergize in driven dimensions, but effectively cancel each other in undriven dimensions. Independent analyses-based on time lags, the correlational structure in the data and computational modeling-demonstrate that this cancellation occurs because implicit adaptation effectively compensates for noise in explicit strategy rather than the converse, acting to clean up the motor noise resulting from low-fidelity explicit strategy during motor learning. These results provide new insight into why implicit learning increasingly takes over from explicit strategy as skill learning proceeds. Implicit learning increases the fidelity of performance during motor learning by acting to adaptively clean up the noise resulting from a low-fidelity explicit strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review
    Kal, Elmar
    Prosee, Rens
    Winters, Marinus
    van der Kamp, John
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (09):
  • [32] Examining the strategy hypothesis: On the functional relation between explicit knowledge and implicit visuomotor adaptation
    Hegele, Mathias
    Heurer, Herbert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 258 - 258
  • [33] Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning
    Stadler, MA
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1997, 4 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [34] Implicit motor-sequence learning: The impact of task complexity and explicit instructions
    Boyd, LA
    Winstein, CJ
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 23 : S71 - S71
  • [35] Multidisciplinary Views on Applying Explicit and Implicit Motor Learning in Practice: An International Survey
    Kleynen, Melanie
    Braun, Susy M.
    Rasquin, Sascha M. C.
    Bleijlevens, Michel H. C.
    Lexis, Monique A. S.
    Halfens, Jos
    Wilson, Mark R.
    Masters, Rich S. W.
    Beurskens, Anna J.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [36] Implicit motor learning from target error during explicit reach control
    Brendan D. Cameron
    Ian M. Franks
    J. Timothy Inglis
    Romeo Chua
    Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 206 : 99 - 104
  • [37] Learning of a Sequential Motor Skill Comprises Explicit and Implicit Components That Consolidate Differently
    Ghilardi, M. Felice
    Moisello, Clara
    Silvestri, Giulia
    Ghez, Claude
    Krakauer, John W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 101 (05) : 2218 - 2229
  • [38] Implicit motor learning from target error during explicit reach control
    Cameron, Brendan D.
    Franks, Ian M.
    Inglis, J. Timothy
    Chua, Romeo
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 206 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [39] Distinguishing implicit and explicit learning
    Michael A. Stadler
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1997, 4 : 56 - 62
  • [40] STRATEGY OF FORM - IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT INTERTEXUALITY
    JENNY, L
    POETIQUE, 1976, (27): : 257 - 281