The Valuation of Ecosystem Services in the Venice Lagoon: A Multicriteria Approach

被引:20
|
作者
D'Alpaos, Chiara [1 ]
D'Alpaos, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Geosci, I-35131 Padua, Italy
关键词
Venice Lagoon; ecosystem services; salt marsh; cultural landscape; world heritage site; analytic hierarchy process; ranking; pairwise comparisons; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SALT MARSHES; OF-VENICE; DECISION-MAKING; CONSISTENCY; SALINITY; ECOLOGY; SCALE;
D O I
10.3390/su13179485
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coastal ecosystems are among the most economically valuable and highly threatened on Earth; they provide valuable ecosystem services (ESs) but are severely exposed to climate changes and human pressure. Although the preservation of coastal ecosystems is of the utmost importance, it is often sub-optimally pursued by Governments and Societies because of the high costs involved. We consider salt-marsh ecosystems in the Venice Lagoon as an example of a threatened landscape, calling for innovative, integrated management strategies, and propose an application-driven methodological framework to support policymakers in the identification of cost-effective incentive policies to ecosystem preservation. By combining group decision-making and Value-Focused-Thinking approaches, we provide a multiple-criteria decision model, based on pairwise comparisons, to identify which ESs are top-priority policy targets according to a cost-effective perspective. We implemented an online Delphi survey process and interviewed a pool of experts who identified "recreation and tourism", "coastal protection from flooding", "carbon storage", "biodiversity and landscape", and "nursery habitats for fisheries" as the five most relevant ESs for the Venice Lagoon taking into consideration the Environmental, Economic, and Social perspectives. Our results suggest that the Environmental perspective is the most important criteria, whereas "biodiversity and landscape" is acknowledged as the most important ES.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Framework for Ecosystem Services Valuation
    Martin, Laura J.
    Blossey, Bernd
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (02) : 494 - 496
  • [22] Study of the ecosystem of the lagoon of Venice, with emphasis on anthropogenic impact
    Sorokin, YI
    Sorokin, PY
    Giovanardi, O
    DallaVenezia, L
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1996, 141 (1-3) : 247 - 261
  • [23] Ecosystem services valuation in developing countries: a review of methods and applicability approach
    Zayreth Morando-Figueroa, Coral
    Salazar-Briones, Carlos
    Mizael Ruiz-Gibert, Jose
    Antonio Lomeli-Banda, Marcelo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-URBAN DESIGN AND PLANNING, 2023, 176 (01) : 6 - 22
  • [24] Valuation of ecosystem goods and services Part 1: An integrated dynamic approach
    Winkler, Ralph
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 59 (01) : 82 - 93
  • [25] Ecosystem functioning and ecological status in the Venice lagoon, which relationships?
    Monti, M. Anelli
    Brigolin, D.
    Franzoi, P.
    Libralato, S.
    Pastres, R.
    Solidoro, C.
    Zucchetta, M.
    Pranovi, F.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 133
  • [26] Lagoon of Venice - Circulation, water exchange and ecosystem functioning - Introduction
    Gacic, M
    Solidoro, C
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2004, 51 (1-4) : 1 - 3
  • [27] Modelling the responses of the Lagoon of Venice ecosystem to variations in physical forcings
    Canu, DM
    Solidoro, C
    Umgiesser, G
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2003, 170 (2-3) : 265 - 289
  • [28] The Energetic Basis for Valuation of Ecosystem Services
    Howard T. Odum
    Eugene P. Odum
    Ecosystems, 2000, 3 : 21 - 23
  • [29] Mangroves in the Galapagos: Ecosystem services and their valuation
    Tanner, Michael K.
    Moity, Nicolas
    Costa, Matthew T.
    Marin Jarrin, Jose R.
    Aburto-Oropeza, Octavio
    Salinas-de-Leon, Pelayo
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 160 : 12 - 24
  • [30] An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services
    Chee, YE
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 120 (04) : 549 - 565