Toxicity Profiles of Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Griffiths, Christopher D. [1 ]
Zhang, Betty [2 ]
Tywonek, Kasia [1 ]
Meyers, Brandon M. [3 ,4 ]
Serrano, Pablo E. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Anesthesia, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Oncol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Juravinski Hosp, Div Gen Surg, 711 Concess St,B3 Off 161, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
关键词
RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; DOUBLE-BLIND; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; SORAFENIB TREATMENT; PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; OPEN-LABEL; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22721
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The recent development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has made neoadjuvant therapy an attractive option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, surgeons are concerned that adverse effects of neoadjuvant therapy with these agents could lead to delayed or even cancelled surgeries. OBJECTIVE To summarize the current evidence regarding toxicity profiles for tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) among patients with HCC. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from January 1990 and December 2021. STUDY SELECTION Single-group, placebo-controlled, and dual-agent clinical trials comparing TKIs and ICIs in patients with HCC were eligible for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Following the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guideline, 2 reviewers independently extracted data. A random-effects model was used. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinically significant liver-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who experienced clinically relevant (grade 3 or higher) adverse events and significant adverse events (ie, those that were life threatening, required hospitalization, or prolonged disability) as well as the risk ratio (RR) of these complications. RESULTS Overall, 30 studies with 12 921 patients were included. Patients had a mean (range) age of 62 (18-89) years; a mean (SD) 84%(3) were male; a mean (SD) 82%(16) had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC; and a mean (SD) 97%(6) had Childs A cirrhosis. Overall, 21% (95% CI, 16%-26%) of patients receiving TKIs had liver toxic effects compared with 28%(95% CI, 21%-35%) of patients receiving ICIs. Severe adverse events occurred in 46%(95% CI, 40%-51%) of patients receiving TKIs compared with 24%(95% CI, 13%-35%) of patients receiving ICIs. Compared with patients receiving sorafenib, other TKIs were associated with similar rates of liver toxic effects (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.24) but higher rates of severe adverse events (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.44). Comparing ICIs with sorafenib, there were similar rates of liver toxic effects (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.40) and severe adverse events (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.95-1.50). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this systematic review and meta-analysis, serious adverse events were lower with ICIs than with TKIs, while liver toxic effects were similar. Combination therapy with novel ICIs is an appealing option in trials of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HCC, requiring evaluation in preoperative trials.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of first-line systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Han, Yue
    Zhi, Wei-Hua
    Xu, Fei
    Zhang, Chen-Bo
    Huang, Xiao-Qian
    Luo, Jian-Feng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (19) : 2415 - 2433
  • [42] Comparison of systemic therapy efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Park, Robin
    da Silva, Laercio Lopes
    Nissaisorakarn, Voravech
    Riano, Ivy
    Saeed, Anwaar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (03)
  • [43] Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jie
    Qiu, Kaijie
    Zhou, Songsheng
    Gan, Yichao
    Jiang, Keting
    Wang, Donghuan
    Wang, Haibiao
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2025, 57 (01)
  • [44] Somatostatin analogues in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ji, Xi-Qing
    Ruan, Xin-Jian
    Chen, Hong
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Shi-Yong
    Yu, Bo
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2011, 17 (08): : RA169 - RA176
  • [45] Sorafenib Plus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ouyang, Guoqing
    Pan, Guangdong
    Xu, Honglai
    Wu, Yongrong
    Liu, Zhen
    Lu, Wuhang
    Yi, Bin
    Chen, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 54 (08) : 675 - 681
  • [46] Second-line treatments for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
    Solimando, Antonio Giovanni
    Susca, Nicola
    Argentiero, Antonella
    Brunetti, Oronzo
    Leone, Patrizia
    De Re, Valli
    Fasano, Rossella
    Krebs, Markus
    Petracci, Elisabetta
    Azzali, Irene
    Nanni, Oriana
    Silvestris, Nicola
    Vacca, Angelo
    Racanelli, Vito
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [47] Comparison of efficacy and safety of adjuvant therapies versus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Quan, Wenjun
    Zulkifli, Hanifah Fazlin
    Saari, Norhafizah
    Shueb, Rafidah Hanim
    Mustaffa, Nazri
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [48] Supplementary Sorafenib Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Supplementary Sorafenib for Liver Cancer
    Huang, Yuanjian
    Cheng, Xiang
    Sun, Ping
    Li, Tong
    Song, Zifang
    Zheng, Qichang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 53 (07) : 486 - 494
  • [49] Systematic review with network meta-analysis: statins and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zhou, Yao-Yao
    Zhu, Gui-Qi
    Wang, Yue
    Zheng, Ji-Na
    Ruan, Lu-Yi
    Cheng, Zhang
    Hu, Bin
    Fu, Shen-Wen
    Zheng, Ming-Hua
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (16) : 21753 - 21762
  • [50] Prognostic value of SPARC in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Xiaoyu
    Xia, Yunhong
    Wang, Shuomin
    Sun, Chen
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (08):