HOW AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION UNDERMINES SUPPORT FOR DEMOCRATIC NORMS

被引:136
|
作者
Kingzette, Jon [1 ]
Druckman, James N. [2 ,3 ]
Klar, Samara [4 ]
Krupnikov, Yanna [5 ]
Levendusky, Matthew [6 ,7 ]
Ryan, John Barry [5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Polit Sci, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Inst Policy Res, Evanston, IL USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ USA
[5] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Polit Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Annenberg Publ Policy Ctr, Polit Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Univ Penn, Annenberg Publ Policy Ctr, Inst Democracy, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
LIMITS;
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfab029
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Does affective polarization-the tendency to view opposing partisans negatively and co-partisans positively-undermine support for democratic norms? We argue that it does, through two mechanisms First, in an age of elite polarization, norms have been politicized. This leads affectively polarized partisans to oppose particular constitutional protections when their party is in power but support them when their party is out of power, via a cue-taking mechanism Second, affective polarization may generate biases that motivate voters to restrict the other party's rights. Using nationally representative surveys, we find strong support for the cue-taking argument. In 2019, with a Republican administration in power, affectively polarized Republicans opposed constitutional protections while affectively polarized Democrats supported them. The reverse was true in 2012 during a Democratic administration. The findings have important, albeit troubling, implications for American democracy, as affective polarization undermines support for basic democratic principles.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 677
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do Affective Polarization and Populism Affect the Support for Holding Referendums?
    Foelsch, Marco
    POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2024, 12
  • [32] Identifying the Place of Democratic Norms in Democratic Peace
    Friedman, Gil
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2008, 10 (03) : 548 - 570
  • [33] After Repression: How Polarization Derails Democratic Transition.
    Brown, Nathan J.
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2022, 20 (02) : 762 - 763
  • [34] How Financialization Undermines Democracy
    Karwowski, Ewa
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2019, 50 (05) : 1466 - 1481
  • [35] Leveraging Corruption: How World Bank Support to Private Sector Undermines Emerging Democracies
    Bissio R.
    Development, 2021, 64 (1-2) : 93 - 96
  • [36] Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
    Voelkel, Jan G.
    Chu, James
    Stagnaro, Michael N.
    Mernyk, Joseph S.
    Redekopp, Chrystal
    Pink, Sophia L.
    Druckman, James N.
    Rand, David G.
    Willer, Robb
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 7 (01) : 55 - +
  • [37] Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes
    Jan G. Voelkel
    James Chu
    Michael N. Stagnaro
    Joseph S. Mernyk
    Chrystal Redekopp
    Sophia L. Pink
    James N. Druckman
    David G. Rand
    Robb Willer
    Nature Human Behaviour, 2023, 7 : 55 - 64
  • [38] Not all ballots should be considered equal: How education-based dehumanization undermines the democratic social contract
    Sainz, Mario
    Vazquez, Alexandra
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 63 (02) : 658 - 680
  • [39] The consistency principle: Crisis perceptions, partisanship and public support for democratic norms in comparative perspective
    Driscoll, Amanda
    Krehbiel, Jay
    Nelson, Michael J.
    Kim, Sangyeon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 64 (01) : 406 - 416
  • [40] NORMS, PROCEDURES, AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY
    BARNARD, FM
    POLITICAL STUDIES, 1992, 40 (04) : 659 - 678