共 50 条
Systematic Review of Levodopa Dose Equivalency Reporting in Parkinson's Disease
被引:3596
|作者:
Tomlinson, Claire L.
[1
]
Stowe, Rebecca
Patel, Smitaa
Rick, Caroline
Gray, Richard
Clarke, Carl E.
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Robert Aitken Inst Clin Res, Birmingham Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] City Hosp, Sandwell & W Birmingham Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Neurol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Clin & Expt Med, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Parkinson's disease;
treatment;
levodopa;
levodopa equivalent dose;
DEEP-BRAIN-STIMULATION;
SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS STIMULATION;
EXCESSIVE DAYTIME SLEEPINESS;
POSTERIOR GPI PALLIDOTOMY;
UNILATERAL PALLIDOTOMY;
PALLIDAL STIMULATION;
RANDOMIZED-TRIAL;
MEDICAL THERAPY;
DOUBLE-BLIND;
FOLLOW-UP;
D O I:
10.1002/mds.23429
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Interpretation of clinical trials comparing different drug regimens for Parkinson's disease (PD) is complicated by the different dose intensities used: higher doses of levodopa and, possibly, other drugs produce better symptomatic control but more late complications. To address this problem, conversion factors have been calculated for anti-parkinsonian drugs that yield a total daily levodopa equivalent dose (LED). LED estimates vary, so we undertook a systematic review of studies reporting LEDs to provide standardized formulae. Electronic database and hand searching of references identified 56 primary reports of LED estimates. Data were extracted and the mean and modal LEDs calculated. This yielded a standardized LED for each drug, providing a useful tool to express dose intensity of different antiparkinsonian drug regimens on a single scale. Using these conversion formulae to report LEDs would improve the consistency of reporting and assist the interpretation of clinical trials comparing different PD medications. (C) 2010 Movement Disorder Society
引用
收藏
页码:2649 / 2653
页数:5
相关论文