VERIFIC.AI APPLICATION: automated fact-checking in Brazilian 2018 general elections

被引：0

作者：

Rocha Junior, Dario Brito ^{[1
]}

Da Cunha Carneiro Lins, Anthony Jose ^{[2
]}

Ferreira De Souza, Alice Cristiny ^{[2
]}

De Oliveira Liborio, Luiz Felipe ^{[3
]}

De Brito Leitao, Andre Henrique ^{[2
]}

Souza Santos, Flavio Henrique ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Catolica Pernambuco, Undergrad Courses Journalism Digital Games & Phot, Recife, PE, Brazil

[2] Univ Catolica Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

来源：

BRAZILIAN JOURNALISM RESEARCH | 2019年 / 15卷 / 03期

关键词：

Automated; Check; Disinformation; News; Elections;

D O I：

10.25200/BJR.v15n3.2019.1178

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

The increasingly hybrid relationship between consumption and production, the post-truth context, and the disinformation ecosystem have all caused tensions in journalism. Creating false news and spreading it across social networks has become common practice. This article introduces the development, testing and data analysis from the Verific.ai application prototype, an automated tool for checking news links on the Android operating system. This application uses data mining for defining the criteria for truthful and false news in the digital environment. The data are presented in the light of the descriptive exploratory analysis, based on tests conducted during the 2018 Brazilian elections. Through this it was possible to define and apply criteria to quickly reveal any potentially false content, while also showing the type of online news content viewed unfavorably by the consuming public.

引用

页码：514 / 539

页数：26

共 50 条

[21] Perceiving AI intervention does not compromise the persuasive effect of fact-checking
Chae, Je Hoon
Tewksbury, David
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024,
[22] DISINFORMATION AND FACT-CHECKING IN THE 2019 URUGUAYAN ELECTIONS. THE CASE OF VERIFICADO URUGUAY
Pedro Molina-Canabate, Juan
Magallon-Rosa, Raul
PERSPECTIVAS DE LA COMUNICACION, 2021, 14 (01): : 89 - 112
[23] Disinformation and fact-checking in the 2019 Argentine elections. The case of Reverso initiative
Molina Canabate, Juan Pedro
Magallon Rosa, Raul
Paniagua Rojano, Francisco Javier
JOURNAL OF LEARNING STYLES, 2020, 13 (26): : 33 - 49
[24] The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who
Schlichtkrull, Michael
Ousidhoum, Nedjma
Vlachos, Andreas
FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (EMNLP 2023), 2023, : 8618 - 8642
[25] Pipeline and dataset generation for automated fact-checking in almost any language
Drchal, Jan
Ullrich, Herbert
Mlynář, Tomáš
Moravec, Václav
Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36 (30) : 19023 - 19054
[26] Credible, Unreliable or Leaked?: Evidence Verification for Enhanced Automated Fact-checking
Chrysidis, Zacharias
Papadopoulos, Stefanos-Iordanis
Papadopoulos, Symeon
Petrantonakis, Panagiotis C.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA AI AGAINST DISINFORMATION, MAD 2024, 2024, : 73 - 81
[27] Verificado Mexico 2018. Disinformation and fact-checking on electoral campaign
Magallon Rosa, R.
REVISTA DE COMUNICACION-PERU, 2019, 18 (01): : 234 - 258
[28] The Rise of the Brazilian Fact-checking Movement: Between Economic Sustainability and Editorial Independence
Lelo, Thales
JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2022, 23 (09) : 1077 - 1095
[29] "The Data Says Otherwise" - Towards Automated Fact-checking and Communication of Data Claims
Fu, Yu
Guo, Shunan
Bursztyn, Victor S.
Hoffswell, Jane
Rossi, Ryan
Stasko, John
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 37TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, USIT 2024, 2024,
[30] A Case of Claims and Facts: Automated Fact-Checking the Future of Journalism's Authority
Johnson, Patrick R.
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2023,

← 1 2 3 4 5 →