Variable responses of mesophyll conductance to substomatal carbon dioxide concentration in common bean and soybean

被引:21
|
作者
Bunce, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Crop Syst & Global Change Lab, Beltsville Agr Res Ctr, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Glycine max; light; Phaseolus vulgaris; temperature; INTERNAL CONDUCTANCE; CO2; DIFFUSION; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE; LEAVES; ACCLIMATION; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s11099-010-0067-7
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Some reports indicate that mesophyll conductance (g (m)) to carbon dioxide varies greatly with the substomatal carbon dioxide concentration (C (i)) during the measurement, while other reports indicate little or no change in g (m) with C (i). I used the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis to determine the response of g (m) to C (i) over the range of about 100 to 300 mu mol mol(-1) C (i) at constant temperature in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) grown over a range of temperatures and photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD). In soybean grown and measured at high PPFD there was only a slight, approximately 15% decrease in g (m) with C (i) over the range of 100 to 300 mu mol mol(-1). With lower PPFD during the measurement of g (m), and especially with low PPFD during plant growth, there was a larger decrease in g (m) with C (i) in soybean. In common bean, the same range in C (i) resulted in about a 60% decrease in g (m) for plants grown and measured at high PPFD, with an even larger decrease for plants at low growth or measurement PPFD. Growth temperatures of 20 to 30A degrees C had little influence on the response of g (m) to C (i) or its absolute value in either species. It is concluded that these two species differed substantially in the sensitivity of g (m) to C (i), and that PPFD but not temperature during leaf development strongly affected the response of g (m) to C (i).
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CONCENTRATION OF TOCOPHEROLS FROM SOYBEAN SLUDGE BY SUPERCRITICAL CARBON-DIOXIDE
    LEE, H
    CHUNG, BH
    PARK, YH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1991, 68 (08) : 571 - 573
  • [22] Carbon dioxide concentration at night affects translocation from soybean leaves
    Bunce, JA
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2002, 90 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [23] Variable Mesophyll Conductance among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff between Photosynthesis and Water-Use-Efficiency1[OPEN]
    Tomeo, Nicholas J.
    Rosenthal, David M.
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 174 (01) : 241 - 257
  • [24] Climate System Responses to a Common Emission Budget of Carbon Dioxide
    Tian, Di
    Dong, Wenjie
    Yan, Xiaodong
    Chou, Jieming
    Yang, Shili
    Wei, Ting
    Zhang, Han
    Guo, Yan
    Wen, Xiaohang
    Yang, Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (07) : 2433 - 2442
  • [25] DEVELOPMENTAL RESPONSES OF RICE TO PHOTOPERIOD AND CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION
    BAKER, JT
    ALLEN, LH
    BOOTE, KJ
    JONES, P
    JONES, JW
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1990, 50 (03) : 201 - 210
  • [26] SAGEBRUSH AND GRASSHOPPER RESPONSES TO ATMOSPHERIC CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION
    JOHNSON, RH
    LINCOLN, DE
    OECOLOGIA, 1990, 84 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [27] GROWTH AND YIELD RESPONSES OF RICE TO CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION
    BAKER, JT
    ALLEN, LH
    BOOTE, KJ
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1990, 115 : 313 - 320
  • [29] Artefactual responses of mesophyll conductance to CO2 and irradiance estimated with the variable J and online isotope discrimination methods
    Gu, Lianhong
    Sun, Ying
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 37 (05): : 1231 - 1249
  • [30] Rapid responses of mesophyll conductance to changes of CO2 concentration, temperature and irradiance are affected by N supplements in rice
    Xiong, Dongliang
    Liu, Xi
    Liu, Limin
    Douthe, Cyril
    Li, Yong
    Peng, Shaobing
    Huang, Jianliang
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 38 (12): : 2541 - 2550