Variable responses of mesophyll conductance to substomatal carbon dioxide concentration in common bean and soybean

被引:21
|
作者
Bunce, J. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Crop Syst & Global Change Lab, Beltsville Agr Res Ctr, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Glycine max; light; Phaseolus vulgaris; temperature; INTERNAL CONDUCTANCE; CO2; DIFFUSION; ARABIDOPSIS-THALIANA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; TEMPERATURE; LEAVES; ACCLIMATION; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s11099-010-0067-7
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Some reports indicate that mesophyll conductance (g (m)) to carbon dioxide varies greatly with the substomatal carbon dioxide concentration (C (i)) during the measurement, while other reports indicate little or no change in g (m) with C (i). I used the oxygen sensitivity of photosynthesis to determine the response of g (m) to C (i) over the range of about 100 to 300 mu mol mol(-1) C (i) at constant temperature in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybean (Glycine max) grown over a range of temperatures and photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD). In soybean grown and measured at high PPFD there was only a slight, approximately 15% decrease in g (m) with C (i) over the range of 100 to 300 mu mol mol(-1). With lower PPFD during the measurement of g (m), and especially with low PPFD during plant growth, there was a larger decrease in g (m) with C (i) in soybean. In common bean, the same range in C (i) resulted in about a 60% decrease in g (m) for plants grown and measured at high PPFD, with an even larger decrease for plants at low growth or measurement PPFD. Growth temperatures of 20 to 30A degrees C had little influence on the response of g (m) to C (i) or its absolute value in either species. It is concluded that these two species differed substantially in the sensitivity of g (m) to C (i), and that PPFD but not temperature during leaf development strongly affected the response of g (m) to C (i).
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On measuring the response of mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide with the variable J method
    Gilbert, Matthew Edmund
    Pou, Alicia
    Zwieniecki, Maciej Andrzej
    Holbrook, N. Michele
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 63 (01) : 413 - 425
  • [2] EFFECTS OF BOUNDARY-LAYER CONDUCTANCE ON SUBSTOMATAL PRESSURES OF CARBON-DIOXIDE
    BUNCE, JA
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1988, 11 (03): : 205 - 208
  • [3] Growth at elevated carbon dioxide concentration reduces hydraulic conductance in alfalfa and soybean
    Bunce, JA
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 1996, 2 (02) : 155 - 158
  • [4] Use of the response of photosynthesis to oxygen to estimate mesophyll conductance to carbon dioxide in water-stressed soybean leaves
    Bunce, James A.
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 32 (07): : 875 - 881
  • [5] Abscisic Acid Induces Rapid Reductions in Mesophyll Conductance to Carbon Dioxide
    Sorrentino, Giuseppe
    Haworth, Matthew
    Wahbi, Said
    Mahmood, Tariq
    Zuomin, Shi
    Centritto, Mauro
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [6] Responses of respiration to increases in carbon dioxide concentration and temperature in three soybean cultivars
    Bunce, JA
    Ziska, LH
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1996, 77 (05) : 507 - 514
  • [7] Effects of carbon dioxide concentration on the interactive effects of temperature and water vapour on stomatal conductance in soybean
    Wilson, KB
    Bunce, JA
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 20 (02): : 230 - 238
  • [8] EFFECTS OF DOUBLED ATMOSPHERIC CARBON-DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION ON THE RESPONSES OF ASSIMILATION AND CONDUCTANCE TO HUMIDITY
    BUNCE, JA
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1993, 16 (02): : 189 - 197
  • [9] Responses of soybean to oxygen deficiency and elevated root-zone carbon dioxide concentration
    Boru, G.
    Vantoai, T.
    Alves, J.
    Hua, D.
    Knee, M.
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 91 (04) : 447 - 453
  • [10] The molecular basis for genotypic variation in soybean photosynthetic responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentration
    Ainsworth, E.
    Leakey, A.
    Gillespie, K.
    Xu, F.
    Nelson, R.
    Ort, D.
    PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 2007, 91 (2-3) : 293 - 293