Nature of Science and Decision-Making

被引:72
|
作者
Khishfe, Rola [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Educ, Beirut 110236, Lebanon
关键词
Science education; High school; Nature of science; Decision-making; Argumentation; Socioscientific issues; TEACHERS CONCEPTIONS; ELEMENTARY TEACHERS; SCIENTIFIC LITERACY; GRADERS VIEWS; STUDENTS; ARGUMENTATION; INSTRUCTION; CONTEXT; CONSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The study investigated the relationship of nature of science (NOS) instruction and students' decision-making (DM) related to a controversial socioscientific issue about genetically modified food. Participants were ninth-grade students in four intact sections (two regulars and two honors) in a public high school in the Midwest. All four groups were taught by their regular science teacher. The treatment comprised a four-week unit about genetic engineering. Two groups (one regular and one honors), referred to as comparison groups, received instruction in genetic engineering and how to formulate arguments and make decisions related to this controversial issue. The other two groups (one regular and one honors), referred to as treatment groups, received instruction in genetic engineering and how to apply NOS aspects as they formulate arguments and make decisions in relation to this controversial issue. Chi-square analyses showed significant differences between the comparison and the treatment groups in relation to the understandings of four NOS aspects. There were no differences in their decisions, but there were differences in their DM factors in the context of the controversial socioscientific issue about genetically modified food. These results are discussed in light of the relationship between students' understandings of NOS and their DM related to controversial socioscientific issues.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 100
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SCIENCE IN POLITICAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    SPANNRAFT, E
    POLITISCHE STUDIEN, 1970, 21 (189) : 88 - 101
  • [22] UTILIZATION OF SCIENCE IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    ZENKOVICH, VP
    SOVIET GEOGRAPHY, 1984, 25 (06): : 433 - 437
  • [23] CRITICAL SCIENCE MOVEMENT AND SCIENCE POLICY DECISION-MAKING
    SHARMA, D
    SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1988, 13 (1-2) : 178 - 179
  • [24] THE NATURE AND CONSEQUENCES OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIC DECISION-MAKING
    MENZIES, RJ
    JACKSON, MA
    GLASBERG, RE
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 1982, 27 (06): : 463 - 470
  • [25] ON THE NATURE OF SUPREME-COURT DECISION-MAKING
    GEORGE, TE
    EPSTEIN, L
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1992, 86 (02) : 323 - 337
  • [26] NATURE AND INFLUENCE OF VALUES IN PRINCIPAL DECISION-MAKING
    CAMPBELLEVANS, GH
    ALBERTA JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 37 (02): : 167 - 178
  • [27] Nature of decision-making in the terminally ill patient
    Barry, B
    Henderson, A
    CANCER NURSING, 1996, 19 (05) : 384 - 391
  • [28] Nature of collective decision-making by simple yes/no decision units
    Eisuke Hasegawa
    Nobuaki Mizumoto
    Kazuya Kobayashi
    Shigeto Dobata
    Jin Yoshimura
    Saori Watanabe
    Yuuka Murakami
    Kenji Matsuura
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [29] CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING - AN ART OR A SCIENCE .5. PATIENT PREFERENCES AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON DECISION-MAKING
    KAY, E
    NUTTALL, N
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1995, 178 (06) : 229 - 233
  • [30] Medical Decision-Making for Adults Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity and a Surrogate: State of the Science
    Kim, Hyejin
    Song, Mi-Kyung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 35 (09): : 1227 - 1234