A survey of cardiac surgeons to evaluate the use of sutureless aortic valve replacement in Canada

被引:1
|
作者
Makhdoum, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Kevin [1 ,3 ]
Koziarz, Alex [4 ]
Reza, Seleman [1 ]
Alsagheir, Ali [1 ]
Pandey, Arjun [5 ]
Teoh, Kevin [6 ]
Alhazzani, Waleed [1 ,7 ]
Lamy, Andre [1 ]
Yanagawa, Bobby [2 ]
Belley-Cote, Emilie P. [1 ,7 ]
Whitlock, Richard [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Populat Res Hlth Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Div Cardiac Surg, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methodol Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Southlake Reg Hlth Sci Ctr, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Crit Care, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Cardiac Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; survey; sutureless aortic valve replacement; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; TRANSCATHETER; IMPLANTATION; INTERMEDIATE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1111/jocs.16839
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) is gaining popularity for the treatment of aortic stenosis. We aimed to describe Canadian cardiac surgeons' practice patterns and perceptions regarding SuAVR. Methods Content experts (clinicians and methodologists) developed the survey. Domains in the questionnaire include: respondent characteristics, factors influencing the decision to implant a SuAVR, barriers to SuAVR use, and interest in participating in a trial. Results A total of 66 cardiac surgeons (median duration of practice: 15 years; range 8-20 years) from 18 hospitals across Canada responded to the survey for a response rate of 84%. Surgeons reported that the following patient characteristics increased the likelihood they would choose SuAVR: hostile root (73%), small annular size (55%), high Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score (42%), older age (40%), to support minimally invasive surgery (25%) and redo-operation (23%). The following patient characteristics made surgeons less likely to pursue SuAVR: young age (73%), low STS score (40%), and large annular size (30%). Reported barriers to SuAVR use included: cost (33%), permanent pacemaker risk (27%) and uncertain durability (12%). Of respondents, 73% were interested in participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing SuAVR with transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Conclusions The primary reasons for surgeons selecting SuAVR were high surgical risk and anatomical challenges. Cost is a primary factor limiting SuAVR use.
引用
收藏
页码:3543 / 3549
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sutureless aortic valve replacement in pure aortic regurgitation: expanding the indications
    Alina Zubarevich
    Arian Arjomandi Rad
    Lukman Amanov
    Marcin Szczechowicz
    Anja Osswald
    Saeed Torabi
    Bastian Schmack
    Arjang Ruhparwar
    Alexander Weymann
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17
  • [42] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AND TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION IN BRAZIL
    Coutinho, B.
    Chirita-Parker, O.
    Okumura, L.
    Riveros, B. S.
    Nita, M. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S562 - S562
  • [43] Early Clinical Experiences of Robotic Assisted Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Stenosis with Sutureless Aortic Valve
    Nagaoka, Eiki
    Gelinas, Jill
    Vola, Marco
    Kiaii, Bob
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 15 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [44] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Chung, Young Hak
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Ko, Young-Guk
    Lee, Sak
    Shim, Chi-Young
    Ahn, Chul-Min
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    Shim, Jae-Kwang
    Kwak, Young-Lan
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 62 (10) : 885 - 894
  • [45] Meta-analysis of sutureless technology versus standard aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Qureshi, Saqib H.
    Boulemden, Anas
    Szafranek, Adam
    Vohra, Hunaid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (02) : 463 - 471
  • [46] SURGEONS AND DEVICES IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT Reply
    Kurlansky, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 150 (01): : 264 - 264
  • [47] Use of Sutureless Valve in Aortic Root Enlargement
    Marasco, Silvana F.
    Banham, Taylah
    Gregory, Shaun D.
    Vu, Tony
    Stephens, Andrew F.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2024, 33 (01): : 92 - 98
  • [48] Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kevin S.
    Makhdoum, Ahmad
    Koziarz, Alex
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Alsagheir, Ali
    Pandey, Arjun
    Reza, Seleman
    Um, Kevin
    Teoh, Kevin
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Lamy, Andre
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (12) : 4734 - 4742
  • [49] New sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: another tool in less invasive aortic valve replacement
    Zannis, Konstantinos
    Folliguet, Thierry
    Laborde, Francois
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 27 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [50] Sutureless aortic valve replacement in the presence of a mechanical mitral prosthesis
    Mazine, Amine
    Tam Hoang Minh
    Bouchard, Denis
    Demers, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 146 (04): : E27 - E28