Technology and System Readiness Assessment for a Nuclear Energy R&D Program

被引:0
|
作者
Dixon, Brent [1 ]
Todosow, Michael [2 ]
Matthern, Gretchen [3 ]
Wigeland, Roald [4 ]
机构
[1] Idaho Natl Lab, Nucl Syst Design & Anal, Idaho Falls, ID 83415 USA
[2] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Nucl Sci & Technol, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[3] Idaho Natl Lab, Proc Sci & Technol, Idaho Falls, ID USA
[4] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper discusses modification of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Technology Readiness Assessment Guide (DOE G 413.3-4A) for use in the Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) program. DOE 413.3-4A describes an approach for identifying and managing technology risks in large construction projects to ensure technology development is part of the project baseline and technology maturity is sufficiently advanced before including a technology in the facility design. The process includes the identification of Critical Technology Elements (CTEs), followed by in-depth evaluation of Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and development of Technology Maturation Plans (TMPs) for those CTEs. This approach was augmented for the NTRD program to include System Readiness Levels (SRLs) as a complement to TRLs, and developing perspective tracks to better organize the TRL/SRL evaluations that determine the level of knowledge/maturation of the CTEs (e.g. Experiments & Modeling, Safety & Hazards, Manufacturing, etc.). The augmented approach was tested on two areas of research in 2017 (metallic nuclear fuels and fuel dissolution for recycling) and is now being applied to a complete advanced nuclear fuel cycle (from uranium mining to waste disposal).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Energy R&D funding
    Ianniello, L
    SCIENCE, 1999, 285 (5435) : 1850 - 1850
  • [32] A Technology Development Matrix for Carbon Capture: Technology Status and R&D Gap Assessment
    Baker, Ryan
    Alizadeh Sahraei, Ommolbanin
    Dal-Cin, Mauro Mario
    Bensebaa, Farid
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [33] Considering energy R&D
    Snow, Nick
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2015, 113 (6C) : 21 - 21
  • [34] Energy absorber R&D
    Kaplan, DM
    Black, EL
    Cassel, KW
    Cummings, MA
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2001, 472 (03): : 632 - 638
  • [35] A technology evaluation model for energy R&D projects in Mexico.
    Escobar-Toledo, CE
    NEW EQUILIBRIA IN THE ENERGY MARKETS: THE ROLE OF NEW REGIONS AND AREAS - VOL 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 84 - 94
  • [36] R&d program analysis berated
    不详
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2008, 86 (05) : 20 - 20
  • [37] Training Program for R&D Staff
    Li, Chen-Mei
    Yang, Tien-Lung
    Lin, Po-Chang
    2008 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 1466 - 1469
  • [39] Expert views - and disagreements - about the potential of energy technology R&D
    Laura Diaz Anadon
    Erin Baker
    Valentina Bosetti
    Lara Aleluia Reis
    Climatic Change, 2016, 136 : 677 - 691
  • [40] Expert views - and disagreements - about the potential of energy technology R&D
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    Baker, Erin
    Bosetti, Valentina
    Reis, Lara Aleluia
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 136 (3-4) : 677 - 691