A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Conroy, Elizabeth J. [1 ,2 ]
Arch, Barbara [2 ]
Harman, Nicola L. [1 ,2 ]
Lane, J. Athene [3 ]
Lewis, Steff C. [4 ]
Norrie, John [4 ]
Sydes, Matthew R. [5 ,6 ]
Gamble, Carrol [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Clin Trials Res Ctr, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaborat, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] UCL, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[6] London MRC Hub Trials Methodol Res, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Trials; Oversight committee; Trial Steering Committee; Executive Committee; Clinical Trial; Data Monitoring Committee; Randomised controlled trial;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-2300-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The DAMOCLES project established a widely used Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Charter for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Typically, within the UK, the DMC is advisory and recommends to another executive body; the Trial Steering Committee (TSC). Despite the executive role of the TSC, the CONSORT Statement does not explicitly require reporting of TSC activity, although is included as an example of good reporting. A lack of guidance on TSC reporting can impact transparency of trial oversight, ultimately leading to a misunderstanding regarding role and, subsequently, further variation in practice. This review aimed to establish reporting practice of TSC involvement in RCTs, and thus make recommendations for reporting. Methods: A cohort examination identifying reporting practice was undertaken. The cohort comprised RCTs published in three leading medical journals (the British Medical Journal, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine) within 6 months in 2012 and the full NIHR HTA Monograph series. Details of TSC constitution and impact were extracted from main publications and published supplements. Results: Of 415 publications, 264 were eligible. These were typical in terms of trial design. Variations in reporting between journals and monographs was notable. TSC presence was identified in approximately half of trials (n = 144), of which 109 worked alongside a DMC. No publications justified not convening a TSC. When reported, the role of the committee and examples of impact in design, conduct and analysis were summarised. Conclusions: We present the first review of reporting TSC activity in the published academic literature. An absence of reporting standards with regards to TSC constitution, activity and impact on trial conduct was identified which can influence transparency of reporting trial oversight. Consistent reporting is vital for the benefits and impact of the TSC role to be understood to support adoption of this oversight structure and reduce global variations in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles
    Bluemle, Anette
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Antes, Gerd
    Schumacher, Martin
    von Elm, Erik
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 342
  • [22] The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery
    Agha, R. A.
    Camm, C. F.
    Doganay, E.
    Edison, E.
    Siddiqui, M. R. S.
    Orgill, D. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 71 - 71
  • [23] Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage
    Xuan Zhang
    Lin Zhang
    Weifeng Xiong
    Xihong Wang
    Xiaohan Zhou
    Chen Zhao
    Guihua Tian
    Hongcai Shang
    Taixiang Wu
    Jiangxia Miao
    Zhaoxiang Bian
    Chinese Medicine, 16
  • [24] Research methods - Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials
    Dumville, JC
    Torgerson, DJ
    Hewitt, CE
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7547): : 969 - 971
  • [25] Quality of reporting on randomised controlled trials of auriculotherapy for pain
    Asher, Gary N.
    Motsinger-Reif, Alison A.
    Jonas, Daniel E.
    Viera, Anthony J.
    ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 29 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [26] The reporting quality of randomised controlled trials in urological surgery
    Muir, G.
    Agha, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 135 - 135
  • [27] Assessment of the reporting quality of randomised controlled trials of massage
    Zhang, Xuan
    Zhang, Lin
    Xiong, Weifeng
    Wang, Xihong
    Zhou, Xiaohan
    Zhao, Chen
    Tian, Guihua
    Shang, Hongcai
    Wu, Taixiang
    Miao, Jiangxia
    Bian, Zhaoxiang
    CHINESE MEDICINE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [28] The quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery
    Agha, Riaz Ahmed
    Camm, Christian
    Doganay, Emre
    Edison, Eric
    Siddiqui, Muhammed
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2012, 215 (03) : S89 - S89
  • [30] Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
    Briel, M.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349