A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Conroy, Elizabeth J. [1 ,2 ]
Arch, Barbara [2 ]
Harman, Nicola L. [1 ,2 ]
Lane, J. Athene [3 ]
Lewis, Steff C. [4 ]
Norrie, John [4 ]
Sydes, Matthew R. [5 ,6 ]
Gamble, Carrol [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Biostat, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Clin Trials Res Ctr, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol Randomised Trials Collaborat, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] UCL, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, MRC Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[6] London MRC Hub Trials Methodol Res, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Trials; Oversight committee; Trial Steering Committee; Executive Committee; Clinical Trial; Data Monitoring Committee; Randomised controlled trial;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-017-2300-1
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The DAMOCLES project established a widely used Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Charter for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Typically, within the UK, the DMC is advisory and recommends to another executive body; the Trial Steering Committee (TSC). Despite the executive role of the TSC, the CONSORT Statement does not explicitly require reporting of TSC activity, although is included as an example of good reporting. A lack of guidance on TSC reporting can impact transparency of trial oversight, ultimately leading to a misunderstanding regarding role and, subsequently, further variation in practice. This review aimed to establish reporting practice of TSC involvement in RCTs, and thus make recommendations for reporting. Methods: A cohort examination identifying reporting practice was undertaken. The cohort comprised RCTs published in three leading medical journals (the British Medical Journal, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine) within 6 months in 2012 and the full NIHR HTA Monograph series. Details of TSC constitution and impact were extracted from main publications and published supplements. Results: Of 415 publications, 264 were eligible. These were typical in terms of trial design. Variations in reporting between journals and monographs was notable. TSC presence was identified in approximately half of trials (n = 144), of which 109 worked alongside a DMC. No publications justified not convening a TSC. When reported, the role of the committee and examples of impact in design, conduct and analysis were summarised. Conclusions: We present the first review of reporting TSC activity in the published academic literature. An absence of reporting standards with regards to TSC constitution, activity and impact on trial conduct was identified which can influence transparency of reporting trial oversight. Consistent reporting is vital for the benefits and impact of the TSC role to be understood to support adoption of this oversight structure and reduce global variations in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials
    Elizabeth J. Conroy
    Barbara Arch
    Nicola L. Harman
    J. Athene Lane
    Steff C. Lewis
    John Norrie
    Matthew R. Sydes
    Carrol Gamble
    Trials, 18
  • [2] Reporting remit and function of trial steering committees in randomised controlled trials: review of published literature
    Conroy, E. J.
    Arch, B.
    Lewis, S.
    Lane, A.
    Sydes, M. R.
    Norrie, J.
    Murray, G.
    Harman, N. I.
    Gamble, C.
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [3] Reporting remit and function of trial steering committees in randomised controlled trials: review of published literature
    EJ Conroy
    B Arch
    S Lewis
    A Lane
    MR Sydes
    J Norrie
    G Murray
    NL Harman
    C Gamble
    Trials, 16
  • [4] Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials: A survey of registered clinical trials units to establish current practice and experiences
    Conroy, Elizabeth J.
    Harman, Nicola L.
    Lane, J. Athene
    Lewis, Steff C.
    Murray, Gordon
    Norrie, John
    Sydes, Matt R.
    Gamble, Carrol
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (06) : 664 - 676
  • [5] Reporting on data monitoring committees in neonatal randomised controlled trials is inconsistent
    Perrem, L. M.
    Gosling, S.
    Ravikumar, I.
    Khashan, A. S.
    Miletin, J.
    Ryan, C. A.
    Dempsey, E.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2017, 106 (01) : 30 - 33
  • [6] Trial steering committees for randomised controlled trials: updating and redeveloping guidance and terms of reference informed by current practice and experience
    EJ Conroy
    S Lewis
    A Lane
    MR Sydes
    J Norrie
    G Murray
    NL Harman
    C Gamble
    Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Reporting of randomised controlled trials
    Counsell, C
    LANCET, 2001, 358 (9281): : 585 - 585
  • [8] Effect of an editorial intervention to improve the completeness of reporting of randomised trials: a randomised controlled trial
    Blanco, David
    Schroter, Sara
    Aldcroft, Adrian
    Moher, David
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Cobo, Erik
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [9] Methodology and reporting of randomised controlled trials
    Jacobs, WCH
    KNEE, 2004, 11 (06): : 423 - 425
  • [10] The reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials
    Ghert, M.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2017, 6 (10): : 600 - 601