Assessing embodied energy of building structural elements

被引:69
|
作者
Vukotic, L. [1 ]
Fenner, R. A. [2 ]
Symons, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arup, London, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Ctr Sustainable Dev, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
[3] Ramboll UK, London, England
关键词
structural frameworks; energy; LIFE-CYCLE ENERGY;
D O I
10.1680/ensu.2010.163.3.147
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although operational energy is currently the focal point of sustainability in building regulations, embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions will become more significant as operational energy consumption is reduced. In the near future, embodied energy could account for a significant proportion of a building's carbon footprint over its lifetime, bearing in mind that the construction of energy-efficient buildings is carbon and energy intensive. Unlike operational energy, embodied energy savings have an immediate significant effect on carbon footprint and are independent of human behaviour. However, there is a lack of consensus within the construction industry on how to assess embodied energy and carbon dioxide and where to draw system boundaries, which has impeded advancement on the issue. This paper analyses the life-cycle embodied energy and carbon dioxide emissions of a building's structural elements, and examines which stages within a building's life are the most significant and offer the most opportunities for a reduction of embodied energy and carbon dioxide. The embodied energy and associated carbon dioxide at the product and construction, maintenance and end-of-life stages of a structure are examined, as well as the potential for energy recovery and carbon dioxide offsetting. A simple single-storey structure is used as a case study to perform comparative analyses between two structural design alternatives: glue-laminated timber panels and steel frame with infill concrete blockwork.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Parametric Analysis of Building Elements on Building Energy Use
    Mottahedi, Mohammad
    Mohammadpour, Atefeh
    Amiri, Shideh Shams
    Asadi, Somayeh
    Riley, David
    Shafaghat, Arezou
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI, 2015, 74 (04): : 79 - 83
  • [32] A Model for Assessing Embodied Energy and GHG Emissions in Infrastructure Projects
    Krantz, Jan
    Lu, Weizhuo
    Shadram, Farshid
    Larsson, Johan
    Olofsson, Thomas
    ICCREM 2015: ENVIRONMENT AND THE SUSTAINABLE BUILDING, 2015, : 1070 - 1077
  • [33] Use of a hybrid energy analysis method for evaluating the embodied energy of building materials
    Alcorn, JA
    Baird, G
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 1996, 8 (1-4) : 319 - 322
  • [34] The relation between building costs and embodied energy: New insights
    1600, International Association for Housing Science (41):
  • [35] Including embodied energy considerations at the conceptual stage of building design
    Yohanis, Y. G.
    Norton, B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2006, 220 (A3) : 271 - 288
  • [36] The relation between building costs and embodied energy: New insights
    Copiello, S.
    Bonifaci, P.
    International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 2017, 41 (02): : 61 - 70
  • [37] Evaluation of the LCA approaches for the assessment of embodied energy of building products
    Ciravoǧlu, A. (aysenc@gmail.com), 1600, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH (22):
  • [38] Assessing Embodied Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Infrastructure Projects
    Krantz, Jan
    Larsson, Johan
    Lu, Weizhuo
    Olofsson, Thomas
    BUILDINGS, 2015, 5 (04) : 1156 - 1170
  • [39] Embodied energy and carbon of building insulating materials: A critical review
    Grazieschi, Gianluca
    Asdrubali, Francesco
    Thomas, Guilhem
    CLEANER ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 2 (02):
  • [40] Assessment of embodied energy of masonry building materials in Hassan, India
    Devanand R.
    Prashanth S.
    Devi P.L.
    Chethan B.A.
    Amar R.
    Harsha H.N.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, 80 : 685 - 694