Silastic drains vs conventional chest tubes after coronary artery bypass

被引:24
|
作者
Frankel, TL
Hill, PC
Stamou, SC
Lowery, RC
Pfister, AJ
Jain, A
Corso, PJ
机构
[1] Washington Hosp Ctr, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] MedStar Res Inst, Sect Cardiac Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
cardiac surgical procedures; comparative study; drainage/methods;
D O I
10.1378/chest.124.1.108
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To investigate differences in drainage amounts and early clinical outcomes associated with the use of Silastic drains, as compared with the conventional chest tube after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Design: Retrospective nonrandomized case control study. Setting: A tertiary teaching hospital. Patients and participants: Outcome data from 554 patients who underwent postoperative pericardial decompression using small Silastic drains were compared with those from 556 patients who had conventional chest tubes after first-time CABG at our institution between January I and August 1, 2000. Measurement and results: Univariate analysis of preoperative characteristics was used to ensure similarity between the two patient groups. Operative mortality, mediastinitis, reoperation for bleeding, and early and late cardiac tamponade occurred in 9 patients (1.6%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), 6 patients (1.1%), and I patient (0.2%), respectively, in the Silastic drain group, compared with 11 patients (2.0%), 9 patients (1.6%), 4 patients (0.7%), 2 patients (0.4%), and 6 patients (1.1%) in the conventional group. No statistically significant differences between the two drains were identified. Drainage amounts (mean +/- SD) were 552.2 +/- 281.8 mL and 548.8 mL +/- 328.7 mL for the Silastic and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.51). Postoperative length of stay was longer for the conventional chest tube group (median, 5 d; range, I to 119 d) when compared to the Silastic drain group (median, 4 d; range, I to 66 d; p = 0.01). Conclusions: We demonstrated that small Silastic drains are equally as effective as the conventional, large-bore chest tubes after CABG with no significant risk of bleeding or pericardial tamponade. Additionally, use of Silastic drains allows more mobility than the conventional chest tubes. As a result of this study, there was a change in our clinical practice toward the exclusive use of Silastic drains after all cardiac surgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of low vs conventional-dose heparin for minimal cardiopulmonary bypass in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
    Fromes, Y.
    Daghildjian, K.
    Caumartin, L.
    Fischer, M.
    Rouquette, I.
    Deleuze, P.
    Bical, O. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (06) : 488 - 492
  • [32] Coronary artery spasm after coronary artery bypass grafting
    Caputo, M
    Nicolini, F
    Franciosi, G
    Gallotti, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 15 (04) : 545 - 548
  • [33] CORONARY-BYPASS AFTER CHEST TRAUMA
    TECTOR, AJ
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1979, 77 (05): : 797 - 797
  • [34] Active clearance vs conventional management of chest tubes after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study
    St-Onge, Samuel
    Chauvette, Vincent
    Hamad, Raphael
    Bouchard, Denis
    Jeanmart, Hugues
    Lamarche, Yoan
    Perrault, Louis P.
    Demers, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [35] Active clearance vs conventional management of chest tubes after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study
    Samuel St-Onge
    Vincent Chauvette
    Raphael Hamad
    Denis Bouchard
    Hugues Jeanmart
    Yoan Lamarche
    Louis P. Perrault
    Philippe Demers
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 16
  • [36] Comparison of outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and conventional coronary artery bypass surgery
    Yu, HY
    Wu, IH
    Chen, YS
    Chi, NH
    Hsu, RB
    Tsai, C
    Wang, SS
    Lin, FY
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 102 (08) : 556 - 562
  • [37] Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting versus single vessel conventional coronary artery bypass
    Allen, KB
    Matheny, RG
    Heimansohn, DA
    Robison, RJ
    Wiesler, MA
    Shaar, CJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 31 (02) : 70A - 70A
  • [38] Troponin I and troponin T values in patients after minimal invasive coronary artery bypass surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting
    Swaanenburg, JCJM
    Loef, BG
    Epema, AH
    Grandjean, JG
    Mariani, MA
    Volmer, M
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 44 : A123 - A123
  • [39] Surgical coronary angioplasty of both coronary ostia after chest radiotherapy. Is it good alternative to conventional coronary bypass surgery?
    Mamedov, Arslan
    Rumbinaite, Egle
    Karciauskas, Dainius
    Jakuskaite, Gabriele
    Veikutiene, Audrone
    Jakuska, Povilas
    Benetis, Rimantas
    PERFUSION-UK, 2025, 40 (01): : 247 - 250
  • [40] Chronologic distribution of stroke after minimally invasive versus conventional coronary artery bypass
    Peel, GK
    Stamou, SC
    Dullum, MKC
    Hill, PC
    Jablonski, KA
    Bafi, AS
    Boyce, SW
    Petro, KR
    Corso, PJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (05) : 752 - 756