A single center, open label study of intradermal administration of an inactivated purified chick embryo cell culture rabies virus vaccine in adults

被引:13
|
作者
Recuenco, Sergio [1 ]
Warnock, Eli [1 ]
Osinubi, Modupe O. V. [1 ]
Rupprecht, Charles E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Rabies Program, Natl Ctr High Consequence Pathogens & Pathol, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] LYSSA LLC, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Rabies; Rabies vaccine; Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies; Intradermal vaccination; Viral inmune responses; ANTIBODY-RESPONSE; IMMUNOGENICITY; REGIMEN; PROPHYLAXIS; PCECV; COST; PVRV;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.083
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In the USA, rabies vaccines (RVs) are licensed for intramuscular (IM) use only, although RVs are licensed for use by the intradermal (ID) route in many other countries. Recent limitations in supplies of RV in the USA reopened discussions on the more efficient use of available biologics, including utilization of more stringent risk assessments, and potential ID RV administration. A clinical trial was designed to compare the immunogenic and adverse effects of a purified chicken embryo cell (PCEC) RV administered ID or IM. Enrollment was designed in four arms, ID Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (Pre-EP), IM Pre-EP, ID Booster, and IM Booster vaccination. Enrollment included 130 adult volunteers. The arms with IM administration received vaccine according to the current ACIP recommendations: Pre-EP, three 1 mL (2.5 I.U.) RV doses, each on day 0, 7, and 21; or a routine Booster, one 1 ml dose. The ID groups received the same schedule, but doses administered were in a volume of 0.1 mL (0.25 I.U.). The rate of increase in rabies virus neutralizing antibody titers 14-21 days after vaccination were similar in the ID and correspondent IM groups. The GMT values for ID vaccination were slightly lower than those for IM vaccination, for both naive and booster groups, and these differences were statistically significant by t-test. Fourteen days after completing vaccination, all individuals developed RV neutralizing antibody titers over the minimum arbitrary value obtained with the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Antibodies were over the set threshold until the end of the trial, 160 days after completed vaccination. No serious adverse reactions were reported. Most frequent adverse reactions were erythema, induration and tenderness, localized at the site of injection. Multi use of 1 mL rabies vaccine vials for ID doses of 0.1 was demonstrated to be both safe and inmunogenic. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4315 / 4320
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of rabies immunogenicity and tolerability following a purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine administered concomitantly with a Japanese encephalitis vaccine
    Jelinek, Tomas
    Cramer, Jakob P.
    Dieckmann, Sebastian
    Hatz, Christoph
    Paulke-Korinek, Maria
    Alberer, Martin
    Reisinger, Emil C.
    Costantini, Marco
    Gniel, Dieter
    Bosse, Dietrich
    Lattanzi, Maria
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2015, 13 (03) : 241 - 250
  • [22] Rabies pre-exposure vaccination of children with purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV)
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    Vakil, Hoshang B.
    Bender, Wolfgang
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (07) : 1454 - 1459
  • [23] Protecting Indian schoolchildren against rabies - Pre-exposure vaccination with purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV) or purified verocell rabies vaccine (PVRV)
    Shanbag, Preeti
    Shah, Nitin
    Kulkarni, Madhuri
    Juvekar, Manisha
    Madhusudana, S. N.
    Vakil, Hoshang B.
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    HUMAN VACCINES, 2008, 4 (05): : 365 - 369
  • [24] Pre-exposure rabies vaccination using purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine intradermally is immunogenic and safe
    Kamoltham, Thavatchai
    Thinyounyong, Wirawan
    Phongchamnaphai, Phana
    Phraisuwan, Phran
    Khawplod, Pakamatz
    Banzhoff, Angelika
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2007, 151 (02): : 173 - 177
  • [25] Duration of immunity: An anamnestic response 14 years after rabies vaccination with purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine
    Malerczyk, Claudius
    Briggs, Deborah J.
    Dreesen, David W.
    Banzhoff, Angelika
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (01) : 63 - 64
  • [26] Evaluation of a new five-injection, two-site, intradermal schedule for purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine: A randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial in healthy adult volunteers in India
    Sudarshan, MK
    Madhusudana, SN
    Mahendra, BJ
    Narayana, DHA
    Giri, MSA
    Popova, O
    Vakil, HB
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2005, 66 (04): : 323 - 334
  • [27] A comparative study on the safety and immunogenecity of purified duck embryo cell vaccine (PDEV, VAXIRAB) with purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCEC, RABIPUR) and purified vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV, VERORAB) (vol 28, pg 148, 2010)
    Ashwathnarayana, Doddabele Hanumantaiah
    Madhusudana, Shampur Narayana
    Sampath, Gadey
    Sathpathy, Durga Madhab
    Mankeshwar, Ranjit
    Ravish, Haradana Halli Shankariah
    Ullas, Padinjaremattathil Thankappan
    Behra, Tapas Ranjan
    Sudarshan, Mysore Kalappa
    Gangaboraiah
    Shamanna, Manjula
    VACCINE, 2010, 28 (13) : 2575 - 2575
  • [28] REACTOGENICITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF THE NEWLY DEVELOPED PURIFIED CHICK-EMBRYO CELL (PCEC)-RABIES VACCINE IN MAN
    SCHEIERMANN, N
    BAER, J
    HILFENHAUS, J
    MARCUS, I
    ZOULEK, G
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR BAKTERIOLOGIE MIKROBIOLOGIE UND HYGIENE SERIES A-MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY INFECTIOUS DISEASES VIROLOGY PARASITOLOGY, 1987, 265 (3-4): : 439 - 450
  • [29] Response to purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine administered intradermally for post-exposure prophylaxis
    Madhusudana, SN
    Anand, NP
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 1997, 10 (03): : 115 - 116
  • [30] Antibody response to purified chick embryo cell vaccine in equines for production of equine rabies immune globulin
    Goel, SK
    Sharma, S
    Singh, US
    BIOLOGICALS, 2003, 31 (04) : 233 - 236